3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
622 F. Supp. 201·
S.D. Fla.·
1985-11-13
·cited 1×
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish the necessary elements for a preliminary injunction, specifically a likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
605 F. Supp. 185·
S.D. Fla.·
1985-04-19
·cited 1×
The court affirmed the granting of a coastal construction permit to the City of Hollywood, finding that the developer, Woodholly Associates, Inc., properly raised the issue of the City's burden to prove the necessity and justification for the development.
-
577 F. Supp. 682·
S.D. Fla.·
1983-12-29
·cited 1×
The court held that the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA) protects Farm Stores because it possesses sufficient indicia of entrepreneurial responsibility and risk, despite the contractual arrangement with Texaco.
-
439 So. 2d 271·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1983-09-21
·cited 1×
Tampa Bay Business Publishing Company appealed the denial of a contempt motion against Peter Roos and the denial of injunctive relief against Zincom, Inc., both arising from Dennis Zink's violation of a noncompete agreement. The court affirmed the denial of contempt against Roos
-
The court held that plaintiffs were entitled to due process, including notice and a hearing, before the USDA could implement emergency interim regulations allowing the importation of Persian limes from Mexico, as their property interests were at stake.
-
Fund for Animals sought to enjoin a controlled deer hunt in Florida's Conservation Area 3A, claiming violations of federal environmental statutes including the Endangered Species Act. The court held that the hunt did not constitute a "taking" of endangered species under the Endan
-
416 So. 2d 498·
Fla. 5th DCA·
1982-07-07
·cited 1×
No. In a 5-4 decision, Justice Byron R. White wrote the majority opinion reversing the lower court. The Supreme Court held that speech of public employees is generally only protected when they speak on matters of public concern. Meyers’ speech only dealt with personal and inte
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of prevailing on its federal preemption claim, thus denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
546 F. Supp. 919·
S.D. Fla.·
1981-07-02
·cited 1×
The court affirmed the district court's preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiffs had established a strong claim to the wreck site and that the defendants' interference was unwarranted.
-
The court held that the plaintiff was unlikely to prevail on the merits of its claims for a preliminary injunction, as yellow page advertising is not a public utility function and the defendant's refusal to publish certain trade names was not a violation of state or federal law.
-
497 F. Supp. 599·
M.D. Fla.·
1980-09-30
·cited 1×
The court held that it had jurisdiction to review the NLRB's assertion of jurisdiction over the jai alai industry and that the NLRB's action was not arbitrary, capricious, or a violation of the Tenth Amendment.
-
-
In this 1968 Florida divorce case, the circuit court addressed whether a wife could maintain a divorce action in Broward County (Second Circuit) when both parties resided in Palm Beach County (Fifteenth Circuit). The court held that despite Bannerman v. Bannerman's broad language
-
220 F.2d 811·
D.C. Cir.·
1955-02-21
·cited 1×
The court held that while the appellant's failure to file the record on time would normally justify dismissal, it was appropriate to dismiss the appeal only in part, allowing it to proceed on the personal judgment against the appellant.
-
The court held that the appeal from the temporary injunction is moot because the landowners surrendered possession of the property.
-
2 Fla. Supp. 178·
Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.·
1952-10-15
·cited 1×
This case addresses whether riparian property owners in Miami Beach can legally construct structures on state-owned foreshore lands between the high and low water marks, and whether the City of Miami Beach has authority to permit such construction. The court holds that these sove
-
To obtain a temporary injunction, a party must prove four elements: substantial likelihood of success on the merits, unavailability of an adequate remedy at law, likelihood of irreparable harm absent the injunction, and that the injunction serves the public interest; failure to p
-
A case challenging campaign finance restrictions becomes moot when the election at issue has concluded and the plaintiff's preferred candidate has lost, as federal courts cannot provide meaningful relief after the electoral event has passed.
-
Standing is determined as of the time the complaint is filed, and post-filing events such as unenrollment are analyzed under mootness doctrine, not standing doctrine; therefore, students who unenrolled after filing suit retain standing for both damages and injunctive relief claim
-
The district court lacked authority to issue a universal injunction against enforcement of Florida's Protection of Children Act because universal injunctions exceed a federal court's equitable authority under the Judiciary Act, as established in Trump v. CASA, Inc., and no except
-
A temporary injunction requires proof of four elements: substantial likelihood of success on the merits, unavailability of an adequate remedy at law, irreparable harm absent the injunction, and that the injunction serves the public interest.
-
The Individual Freedom Act's prohibition on university professors endorsing eight specified viewpoints relating to race, sex, and national origin violates the First Amendment as applied to public university professors. Garcetti v. Ceballos does not extend to classroom speech by u
-
11th Cir.·
2026-06-11
A childcare provider dismissed from a state voucher program for failing to comply with an on-site audit is not entitled to a pre-deprivation hearing under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Under the Mathews v. Eldridge balancing test, the provider's private inte
-
Fla.·
2026-06-10
The Florida Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction to grant a constitutional writ to intervene in a First District Court of Appeal's pending appeal of a trial court's order denying a temporary injunction, as the doctrine of all writs does not provide an independent basis for the Court'
-
A temporary injunction is an extraordinary remedy that requires the moving party to demonstrate irreparable injury, absence of an adequate remedy at law, a clear legal right to relief, and that the injunction serves the public interest.
-
A trial court does not err in denying a motion for temporary injunction without notice when it explicitly permits the movant to schedule a hearing after service of process on the opposing party.
-
Florida's SB 1084 banning the manufacture and sale of lab-grown meat is not preempted by the federal Poultry Products Inspection Act because it does not regulate the premises, facilities, operations, or ingredients of poultry processors. Although Upside has a cause of action in e
-
The Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court's temporary injunction order regarding proposed changes to real property, finding the written order facially insufficient under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c) and holding that the trial court failed to provide p
-
The NCAA appeals a trial court's issuance of a temporary injunction requiring it to grant Doctor Bradley eligibility to compete in college basketball for the 2025-2026 season, waiving the NCAA's Five-Year Rule. The appellate court quashes the injunction, finding the trial court's
-
Del. Ch.·
2026-02-25
NEC Fund VI, a lender to Hecate Holdings, seeks a preliminary injunction to recover $75 million in settlement proceeds from Hecate's settlement with Repsol over a put option dispute. Although the court found NEC likely to succeed on breach of contract claims, it denied the prelim
-
S.D. Fla.·
2026-02-11
The court granted plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of trademark infringement and a high probability of irreparable harm.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2026-02-10
The court granted plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from using the ACDANC trademark on infringing products and ordering asset freezes.
-
The court held that a habeas petition must be filed in the district of confinement, and where filed incorrectly, the case should be transferred in the interest of justice.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2026-02-05
The court adopted and approved the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting a Temporary Restraining Order against CBP to prevent the release of disputed cargo to anyone except the Plaintiff.
-
The court affirmed and adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dismissing the plaintiff's amended complaint and denying her emergency demand for a preliminary injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2026-01-29
Jorge A. Zea sought a preliminary injunction to compel the National Association of Realtors to comply with its own binding rules. The district court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation and denied Zea's motion for preliminary injunction.
-
A trial court does not abuse its discretion in granting a temporary injunction against a former employee for non-compete agreement breach when the employee's violation is supported by competent substantial evidence, because irreparable harm is presumed upon such a breach.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2026-01-27
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from using the plaintiff's trademark and freezing their assets.
-
Del. Ch.·
2026-01-21
MyCarrier seeks attorneys' fees as the prevailing party after the court denied Project 44's motion for preliminary injunction. The court stayed the fee award pending final resolution of the underlying breach of contract dispute in arbitration, finding substantial overlap between
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction failed to meet the necessary legal and procedural requirements.
-
The court held that the first-filed rule applies, requiring transfer of the second-filed suit to the first-filed forum for consolidation.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2026-01-14
The court granted the plaintiff's renewed motion for leave to file an amended complaint, extending the deadline for filing.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2026-01-14
The court held that it could not determine subject matter jurisdiction and denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction due to non-compliance with procedural rules.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2026-01-12
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction must be denied because it failed to comply with applicable federal and local rules.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2026-01-12
A plaintiff must demonstrate irreparable harm to obtain a preliminary injunction, and a mere showing of a constitutional violation, or speculative harm to principals, or the potential for later corrective action, does not meet this standard.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2026-01-09
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because the alleged harm was not actual or imminent, and the motion was procedurally deficient.
-
11th Cir.·
2026-01-09
Four nonresident activists challenged Atlanta's requirement that signature gatherers on local referendum petitions be city residents, claiming it violated their First Amendment rights, and the district court granted their preliminary injunction. The Eleventh Circuit reversed, hol
-
S.D. Fla.·
2026-01-09
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because she failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2026-01-08
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm.
-
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, converting a previously issued temporary restraining order into a preliminary injunction.