RAMON RUIZ
v.
PUBLIC STORAGE, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A temporary injunction is an extraordinary remedy that requires the moving party to demonstrate irreparable injury, absence of an adequate remedy at law, a clear legal right to relief, and that the injunction serves the public interest.
[1] A temporary injunction is an extraordinary remedy requiring the moving party to establish by competent, substantial evidence that: (1) irreparable injury will result if r…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Although a trial court is afforded broad discretion, a temporary injunction is an extraordinary remedy which should be granted only sparingly. A party seeking an injunction must demonstrate that (1) irreparable injury will result if relief is not granted; (2) there is no adequate remedy at law; (3) the party has a clear legal right to relief; and (4) entry of an injunction serves the public interest.”
Court's statement of the legal standard for temporary injunctions, citing Hamad v. Sarsour, 406 So. 3d 334, 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
Ramon Ruiz appealed a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County denying his request for a temporary injunction against Public Stora…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Strict Compliance With Procedural Rules cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 4, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Nos. 3D25-2585 Lower Tribunal No. 25-15347-CA-01
Ramon Ruiz, Appellant,
vs.
Public Storage, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles Kenneth Johnson, Judge.
Ramon Ruiz, in proper person.
Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP, and Jeffrey R. Geldens, and Caroline A. Sand, for appellees.
Before LOGUE, GORDO and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.610; Hamad v. Sarsour, 406 So. 3d 334, 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025) (“Although a trial court is afforded broad discretion, a temporary injunction is an extraordinary remedy which should be granted only sparingly. A party seeking an injunction must demonstrate that (1) irreparable injury will result if relief is not granted; (2) there is no adequate remedy at law; (3) the party has a clear legal right to relief; and (4) entry of an injunction serves the public interest. The moving party must furnish competent, substantial evidence satisfying each prong.") (internal citations omitted); Yardley v. Albu, 826 So. 2d 467, 470 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) ("Because the entering of a temporary injunction is an extraordinary remedy, strict compliance with the provisions of rule 1.610 is required.").
2