CHRISTINA CORONA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NATURAL GUARDIAN OF J. C.
v.
AVE MARIA PARISH, INC. D/B/A DONAHUE ACADEMY OF AVE MARIA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court does not err in denying a motion for temporary injunction without notice when it explicitly permits the movant to schedule a hearing after service of process on the opposing party.
[1] A denial of a motion for temporary injunction without notice does not constitute a denial of the motion itself or a refusal to grant a hearing when the trial court explic…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceChristina Corona, individually and as natural guardian of a minor, filed an Emergency Motion for Temporary Injunction against Ave Maria Parish, Inc. d…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Temporary Injunction Without Notice cases and more on FLexlaw
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2026-0710 Lower Tribunal No. 2026-CA-0000610
CHRISTINA CORONA, individually and as Natural Guardian of J.C., a minor, Appellant,
v. AVE MARIA PARISH, INC., d/b/a DONAHUE ACADEMY OF AVE MARIA, Appellee.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Collier County. Ramiro Mañalich, Judge.
April 8, 2026
MIZE, J.
Appellant, Christina Corona, appeals the trial court's order on her Emergency Motion for Temporary Injunction.¹ Appellant asserts that the trial court erred by denying the motion and also by denying the motion without first conducting a hearing on the motion. However, the trial court's order makes clear that the trial court only denied Appellant's motion to the extent the motion sought a temporary injunction without notice to Appellee. The trial court's order did not
1 We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(B).
deny the motion without permitting a hearing on the motion. On the contrary, the trial court's order explicitly stated that Appellant was permitted to schedule a hearing on the motion once service of process had been effectuated on Appellee. Because we find no error in the trial court's denial of the motion to the extent it sought a temporary injunction without notice to Appellee, we affirm the trial court's order. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant scheduling a hearing on the motion after providing notice to Appellee, which the trial court's order explicitly permitted.
AFFIRMED.
NARDELLA and GANNAM, JJ., concur. Raymond Christopher and David Asti, of Ave Maria Law Center, Ave Maria, for Appellant.
Brendan J. Shearman, of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellee.