Application For Preliminary Injunction

25 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Pierre v. United States
  525 F.2d 933· 5th Cir.· 1976-01-08 ·cited 52×
  Habeas corpus is not the appropriate vehicle for declaratory or injunctive relief unrelated to custody. However, an independent action for such relief may be possible.
• KMW Int'l v. Chase Manhattan Bank
  606 F.2d 10· 2d Cir.· 1979-08-10 ·cited 46×
  The court held that KMW failed to meet the standard for a preliminary injunction because it did not demonstrate irreparable harm or a likelihood of success on the merits, as the obligation under an irrevocable letter of credit is independent of the underlying transaction and poli
• The Chief Freight Lines Co. v. Local Union NO. 886 & S. Area Conf. of Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters
  514 F.2d 572· 10th Cir.· 1975-04-08 ·cited 24×
  The court held that an injunction enforcing a no-strike provision while simultaneously staying arbitration is improper under the Boys Markets exception, as the employer's obligation to arbitrate is a condition for such an injunction.
• Hannan v. City OF Haverhill
  120 F.2d 87· 1st Cir.· 1941-05-29 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the denial of an interlocutory injunction was not an abuse of discretion because the plaintiffs had not demonstrated irreparable harm or applied for a permit.
• Murray Ferguson Under Chapter X Proceeding for Equitable Plan Co. v. Bucks Cnty. Farms, Inc.
  280 F.2d 739· 3d Cir.· 1960-07-07 ·cited 10×
  A Chapter X trustee seeking an injunction in a plenary action must comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) by posting security.
• United States v. Enter. Mgmt. Consultants, Inc.
  883 F.2d 886· 10th Cir.· 1989-08-28 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the district court abused its discretion by granting a preliminary injunction because EMCI failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits regarding the validity of the bingo management contracts.
• Recon/Optical, Inc. v. Gov't OF Israel
  816 F.2d 854· 2d Cir.· 1987-04-17 ·cited 6×
  The court affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction, holding that the appellant had no chance of success on the merits in enjoining a letter of credit drawdown.
• Cole v. United States
  657 F.2d 107· 7th Cir.· 1981-03-11 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the suit was properly removed to federal court and subsequently dismissed due to sovereign immunity, and that the injunctive relief granted was proper.
• Meyers v. Famous Realty, Inc.
  271 F.2d 811· 2d Cir.· 1959-10-27 ·cited 6×
  A non-carrier lessor, by merely leasing its properties to a carrier, does not become a carrier by railroad and is not obligated to operate the lessee's railroad when the lessee obtains an abandonment order.
• Lyonel DOR v. Dist. Dir.
  891 F.2d 997· 2d Cir.· 1989-12-08 ·cited 5×
  The court held that the appellant's continued detention by the INS is legal and that the terms of the court's stay of deportation have been satisfied, allowing for the vacation of the stay.
• Jacobson v. The Organized Crime & Racketeering Section OF the United States Dep't OF Just.
  544 F.2d 637· 2d Cir.· 1976-11-03 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the Anti-Injunction Act barred the suit for a preliminary injunction and that the damage claims were legally insufficient.
• Pub. Utils. Comm'n of Dist. of Columbia v. Cap. Transit Co.
  214 F.2d 242· D.C. Cir.· 1954-05-07 ·cited 4×
  The court granted an injunction pending appeal, enjoining the company from paying a dividend and redeeming bonds, pending further investigation and report.
• Republic of Panama v. Citizens & S. Int'l Bank
  682 F. Supp. 1544· S.D. Fla.· 1988-03-22 ·cited 3×
  The court denied motions to intervene by Banco Nacional de Panama and the Palma government, and granted a preliminary injunction against the transfer of funds held by Panamanian government entities, based on the political question doctrine and 12 U.S.C. § 632.
• Local Union NO. 733 OF the Int'l Bhd. OF Elec. Workers v. Ingalls Shipbuilding Division
  906 F.2d 149· 5th Cir.· 1990-07-18 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the union failed to demonstrate irreparable harm sufficient to warrant a preliminary injunction against the employer's drug testing program pending arbitration, as traditional arbitral remedies could address potential harm.
• Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers Sys. Council U-4 v. Fla. Power & Light Co.
  678 F. Supp. 257· S.D. Fla.· 1987-09-04 ·cited 2×
  The court held that a preliminary injunction was appropriate to preserve the arbitration process and prevent irreparable harm, outweighing the harm to the employer from a temporary delay in implementing a drug testing program.
• Baker v. Sch. Bd. of Marion Cnty.
  487 F. Supp. 380· M.D. Fla.· 1980-03-11 ·cited 2×
  The court held that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable injury, thus denying their application for a preliminary injunction.
• Local 32B, Serv. Emps. Int'l Union, AFL-CIO v. Sage Realty Corp.
  524 F.2d 601· 2d Cir.· 1975-09-25 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the union failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits regarding the defendants' RAB membership, thus affirming the denial of a preliminary injunction.
• Hopewell Twp. Citizens I-95 Comm. v. Volpe
  482 F.2d 376· 3d Cir.· 1973-07-02 ·cited 2×
  The court held that summary judgment was improperly granted because a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding the date of federal design approval, and res judicata and collateral estoppel do not bar the current action.
• Saxe v. United States & Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev.
  471 F.2d 1293· 2d Cir.· 1972-12-15 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the denial of a preliminary injunction was not an abuse of discretion because the plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim for judicial relief regarding the HUD code enforcement program.
• Farfan v. Bondi
  S.D. Fla.· 2026-02-10
  The court held that a habeas petition must be filed in the district of confinement, and where filed incorrectly, the case should be transferred in the interest of justice.
• United Petro/Energy Corp. v. United States
  846 F. Supp. 993· S.D. Fla.· 1994-03-09
  The court held that the Anti-Injunction Act barred the suit because the plaintiff's request for a tax registration certificate was an attempt to restrain the collection of taxes, and the plaintiff failed to meet the criteria for the sole judicial exception to the Act.
• Sasso v. Milhollan
  735 F. Supp. 1045· S.D. Fla.· 1990-04-19
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish the prerequisites for a preliminary injunction, denying his application to enjoin his deportation hearing transfer.
• Dad's Props., Inc. v. Lucas
  545 So. 2d 926· Fla. 2d DCA· 1989-05-12
  Dad's Properties, Inc. appealed the denial of its application for a preliminary injunction to enforce a covenant not to compete against the Lucas family, who sold their adult nightclub business (Sugar Daddy's) to Dad's Properties in 1986 but subsequently opened a competing club (
• Walker Mfg. Co. v. Bloomberg
  298 F.2d 688· 1st Cir.· 1962-01-31
  The court held that the district court had summary jurisdiction because the intangible 'Bettinger process' was not sufficiently in Walker's possession prior to bankruptcy filing, and the injunction was improperly issued as Walker's actions were authorized by the contract and subs
• Int'l Co., Inc. v. Hotel Emps. Union
  7 Fla. Supp. 164· Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1955-05-20
  A Miami Beach hotel sought a preliminary injunction against a union and its officers to halt picketing and an unauthorized strike. The circuit court granted the injunction, finding that the union-organized strike lacked majority employee authorization under Florida law and that t