3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
M.D. Fla.·
2026-01-06
The court held that the movant failed to establish a substantial likelihood of irreparable injury, a necessary prerequisite for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2026-01-05
The court granted in part and denied in part the petitioner's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order, enjoining respondents from removing the petitioner from the district but denying the request to enjoin her ongoing detention.
-
Del. Ch.·
2026-01-02
BankUnited sought a preliminary injunction against former executives and their new employer Customers Bank for allegedly violating non-solicitation obligations. The Delaware Court of Chancery denied the injunction, finding BankUnited unlikely to succeed on the merits because the
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and permanent injunction, finding he failed to establish the necessary elements for such relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-12-30
The court affirmed and adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting in part the motion to dismiss ADA claims and staying the FHA claims under the Colorado River abstention doctrine.
-
The court recommended denying the plaintiffs' Rule 60(b) motion and motion for injunction, finding the district court retains jurisdiction to deny such motions while an appeal is pending.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on claims for trademark infringement and breach of restrictive covenants.
-
An order granting summary judgment on some counts of a multi-count complaint, while expressly withholding entry of final judgment pending resolution of remaining claims, is not appealable as a non-final order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(B) or (C)(ii) bec
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-12-23
Plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction are denied because she failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-12-22
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's reports and recommendations, granting a renewed temporary restraining order to prevent the removal of a child from the jurisdiction and requiring the surrender of the child's passport.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-12-19
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint and for CM/ECF access.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-12-19
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the petitioner's claims challenging his detention and deportation due to the bar imposed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g).
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-12-16
The court granted the plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for breach of contract and irreparable harm.
-
The district court adopted and affirmed the magistrate judge's report and recommendation denying Jetchill Ltd's motion for preliminary injunction against Shenzhen Jiarui Minghui Trading Co., Ltd and Explonova Store. The court found no error in the magistrate judge's analysis and
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to meet the required legal standards and procedural requirements.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-12-09
The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of trademark infringement claims and irreparable harm if relief is not granted.
-
The Shaping Academy sought preliminary injunctive relief and temporary restraining order against Aetna Behavioral Health LLC. The district court, adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation without objection, denied the preliminary injunction motion, granted defendant's motion
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-12-05
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from infringing on their trademarks and ordering the restraint of assets.
-
11th Cir.·
2025-12-04
The court held that the district court abused its discretion by denying a preliminary injunction, finding the plaintiffs likely to succeed on their First Amendment challenge to the ordinance.
-
Certiorari review is unavailable to compel a trial court to rule on a pending post-election challenge, and even if reviewable, no irreparable harm exists where post-election remedies under section 102.168, Florida Statutes, could provide adequate relief.
-
11th Cir.·
2025-12-01
The court held that the district court failed to conduct the required facial challenge analysis under Moody v. NetChoice, necessitating a remand.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-12-01
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction, finding the plaintiff did not establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits regarding the city's time, place, and manner restrictions on protest.
-
A party seeking injunctive relief must establish four specific prerequisites, and failure to plead any one is fatal to the request.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-11-24
The court held that the plaintiff's complaint, as filed, does not comply with the procedural rules necessary to seek a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-11-19
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's trademarks.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-19
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
-
An ex parte order prohibiting removal or disposal of marital home contents constitutes a temporary injunction that must comply with statutory requirements, including sufficient factual findings, a bond requirement, and an evidentiary hearing on motions to dissolve or modify.
-
A preliminary injunction was denied because the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm. The court found that the contract language permitted termination at any time for any reason, and most claims appeared remediable th
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-19
The court held that the arbitration agreement is enforceable and the case should be stayed pending arbitration, as the plaintiff failed to demonstrate unconscionability or that equitable carve-out provisions precluded arbitration.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-11-14
The court granted Plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction, enjoining Defendants from using the DESIGNICE trademark on infringing products and restraining their assets.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-11-14
The court held that the motion for a temporary restraining order must be denied due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with procedural requirements.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-14
The court denied the parties' motions for consent injunctions, finding that the proposed language regarding who is bound and the duration of the permanent injunction required modification to comply with Rule 65.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-14
The court granted a temporary restraining order against the defendant, enjoining her from retaining or using the plaintiff's confidential information, finding a likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's claim for declaratory relief was a disguised breach of contract claim, subject to arbitration, and that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate grounds for a preliminary injunction.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-11-13
A public employee's interest in free speech does not outweigh the employer's interest in effective and efficient fulfillment of its responsibilities when the speech causes significant disruption and public trust concerns.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-12
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order because the movant failed to satisfy the procedural requirements, specifically regarding notice to the opposing party.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-11-11
The court held that a party seeking only money damages cannot obtain a preliminary injunction or stay to preserve funds in the court registry solely to ensure satisfaction of a potential future judgment.
-
The Anti-Injunction Act bars federal courts from enjoining state court proceedings unless specific exceptions apply, and neither the FHA nor the ADA provide such an exception for this case.
-
The court granted in part Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, finding sufficient grounds for ex parte relief due to the risk of irreparable harm from the potential disclosure of trade secrets and confidential information.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-07
The court held that plaintiffs failed to establish irreparable harm, a prerequisite for injunctive relief.
-
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the underlying complaint was insufficient to state a claim.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-03
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable injury.
-
Del. Ch.·
2025-10-31
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for an antisuit injunction, enjoining the defendant from prosecuting her claims in New York. The court found that valid Delaware forum selection clauses in the corporate charter and financing agreements required the defendant to litigate h
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits because he did not show his Minnesota sex offender designation was removed by a court order stating such removal.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-10-29
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of trademark infringement claims and irreparable harm if relief is not granted.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-10-28
The court accepted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the Plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-10-27
The Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting a renewed Temporary Restraining Order to prevent the removal of a child from the jurisdiction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-10-24
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of trademark infringement claims and irreparable harm if relief is not granted.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-24
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction was denied because it failed to comply with procedural rules and evidentiary standards.
-
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or a substantial threat of irreparable injury, thus denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.