3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-21
The court granted in part and deferred in part the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief, issuing a temporary restraining order against the defendant.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-16
The court held that good cause exists to grant the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on Chase Bank before the Rule 26(f) conference.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-15
The court held that plaintiffs failed to establish irreparable injury, a prerequisite for a temporary restraining order.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-14
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the necessary emergency circumstances for proceeding without notice to the defendants. The court deferred consideration of a preliminary injunction pending service and respon
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-14
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a permanent injunction because it relied on the wrong legal standard and was premature.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-10-13
The Magistrate Judge recommended denying Defendant's motion to dissolve the TRO as moot because it expired by operation of law, and denying Plaintiff's motion to extend the TRO because it also expired and further extension would require treating it as a preliminary injunction, wh
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-10-09
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's ex parte motion for a preliminary injunction, including asset restraints, due to strong evidence of design patent infringement by the defendants.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-09
The court held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff had adequate alternative remedies under 8 U.S.C. § 1503 and an ongoing related case in California. Consequently, the plaintiff's claims under the APA and for mandamus were dismissed, and his request f
-
A prisoner's motion for a preliminary injunction was denied because he failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or a substantial threat of irreparable injury.
-
In a trademark dispute, the court denied defendants' motion for expedited discovery to depose eight witnesses who submitted declarations in support of plaintiff's pending motion for preliminary injunction. The court found that defendants would have adequate opportunity to cross-e
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-10-07
The court recommended denial of the plaintiff's motions for temporary restraining orders because he failed to meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b)(1) regarding immediate and irreparable injury and proper notice certification.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-03
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the necessity of proceeding without notice to the defendant.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-30
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-29
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the requirements for injunctive relief and did not properly initiate a civil action.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-26
The court held that the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction should be denied because they failed to demonstrate irreparable harm and unduly delayed in seeking relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-25
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from using the TRUMP trademarks on counterfeit goods and requiring various third parties to assist in enforcing the injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-23
The court held that the pro se prisoner's complaint was procedurally deficient and dismissed it without prejudice, but granted the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and allowed an opportunity to amend.
-
The court held that a prisoner's transfer moots her claim for injunctive relief related to the prior institution.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-18
The court granted the parties' joint motion to resolve the preliminary injunction, issuing an order based on their agreed-upon terms.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-16
The court denied the plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because they failed to meet procedural requirements and lacked proper notice to the opposing parties.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-16
The court held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies, and therefore denied the motion for preliminary injunction and dismissed the action.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-11
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, including asset restraint, due to strong evidence of copyright infringement by defendants who failed to appear or respond.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-03
The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting the defendants' motion to dismiss and closing the case.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-03
The court denied the petitioner's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, finding he was unlikely to succeed on the merits and that injunctive relief was not in the public interest.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-02
The court adopted the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-22
The court held that a motion for preliminary injunction must be denied if the movant fails to provide notice to the adverse party or establish an extraordinary circumstance excusing notice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-22
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the likelihood of irreparable harm and the impracticality of providing notice to the defendant.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-22
The court granted in part plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order, finding they demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on their Florida Unauthorized Publication Act claim, a likelihood of irreparable injury, that the equities weighed in their favor, and tha
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-22
The court held that a motion for preliminary injunction must comply with notice requirements under federal and local rules.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-08-21
The court held that a motion for preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order must be denied if it seeks relief for events not at issue in the complaint and against parties not named in the litigation.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-21
The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate imminent irreparable harm and the necessity of proceeding without notice to the defendants.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-20
The court denied Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company's motion for a preliminary injunction without prejudice.
-
11th Cir.·
2025-08-19
A Florida-based underwater exploration company sued France seeking salvage compensation and other remedies after discovering the wreck of a 16th-century French military vessel off Florida's coast, but the court affirmed summary judgment for France, holding that the Sunken Militar
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-19
The court denied Defendants' motion for an extension of time to answer and denied their motion to stay Plaintiff's preliminary injunction motion, but granted a limited extension for Defendants to respond to the injunction motion.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-15
The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding sufficient evidence of trademark infringement and related claims.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-14
The court denied Plaintiff's emergency motion for temporary injunctive relief because he failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 65 and local rules.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-13
In this civil rights case, the District Court affirmed the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to dismiss Plaintiff Ruiz's amended complaint as a defective "shotgun pleading" that failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). The Court granted Ruiz's motion to proceed
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-13
The court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting in part Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-12
The court denied the motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and took the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-08
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the burden for a temporary restraining order without notice.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-07
The court recommended granting Plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits regarding breach of non-compete agreements and irreparable harm.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-05
The court held that while a prisoner's First Amendment free speech claim against Sheriff Ivey regarding a book ban may proceed, most other claims are dismissed for failure to state a claim or for being duplicative.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-04
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and sought relief outside the scope of his amended complaint, thus denying his motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice because the plaintiff failed to meet the required legal standards.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's pro se prisoner civil rights complaint was dismissed without prejudice due to failure to pay the filing fee, use the required form, and adequately state claims or request injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-17
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, including asset restraints, due to strong evidence of copyright infringement by defendants who failed to appear or respond.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-16
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm, thus denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-10
The court held that the Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction must be denied because it failed to comply with procedural requirements regarding notice, security, and the content of the supporting memorandum.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-09
Deltec Bank & Trust Limited sought a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to freeze approximately $20.7 million in funds held by Ibanera LLC and its CEO Michael Carbonara, which Deltec had transferred to Ibanera under a Processing Services Agreement for cross-bo