3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to dismiss the Amended Complaint as a shotgun pleading and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and denied the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-07-08
A federal district court in Florida granted preliminary injunctions blocking enforcement of new state laws that restrict petition circulator eligibility, finding that the residency and citizenship requirements for those gathering signatures for ballot initiatives impose unconstit
-
Del. Ch.·
2025-07-08
The court held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to decide the issue of substantive arbitrability because the parties' arbitration agreement, through its incorporation of AAA rules, clearly and unmistakably delegated such issues to an arbitrator. Consequently, the plaint
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-07
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction due to the defendant's alleged infringement of the plaintiff's trademarks and failure to appear or respond.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-02
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits of their claim under 15 U.S.C. § 1119, and because § 1119 is not an independent cause of action.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-06-30
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction must be denied because she failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits of her § 1983 claim.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-06-30
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction must be denied because she failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits, specifically the 'color of law' element required for a § 1983 claim.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-06-23
The court held that the plaintiff's amended complaint must be dismissed and her motion for a temporary restraining order denied because the action constitutes an improper collateral attack on a state court foreclosure judgment, barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-06-20
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff's significant delay in seeking relief undermined its claim of irreparable harm.
-
When parties modify a contract through a subsequent agreement on the same subject matter, the later agreement controls to the extent of any repugnancy with the earlier agreement.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2025-06-17
The Court denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's amended complaint for legal malpractice. The Court found that the plaintiff had adequately pleaded that the Court of Chancery had subject matter jurisdiction over the underlying action, that Delaware had personal
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-06-17
The court held that the inmate plaintiff failed to meet the heightened burden required for a mandatory preliminary injunction to grow a longer beard.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-06-16
The court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, warranting denial of his motion for injunctive relief.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-06-09
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and his complaint are denied and dismissed, respectively, without prejudice.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and denied her motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-29
The court held that the student failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for his First Amendment claims regarding graduation attire.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-21
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, finding sufficient grounds to freeze cryptocurrency assets in identified wallets.
-
The court recommended transferring the case to the District of Arizona because it is a more convenient forum, as a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred there and the Northern District of Florida lacks personal jurisdiction over the City of Phoenix.
-
The court denied the petitioner's motions for a stay of removal, temporary restraining order, and notification to USCIS.
-
11th Cir.·
2025-05-13
Florida's Senate Bill 1438 criminalized knowingly admitting children to "adult live performances," including those depicting "lewd conduct," but the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held the law was likely unconstitutional on its face because the vague definition of "lewd conduc
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-12
The court held that the termination of the plaintiff's SEVIS status was likely arbitrary and capricious, violating the APA and Due Process Clause, and granted a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-12
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction was denied, and the complaint was dismissed.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-05-12
The court recommended granting a preliminary injunction against defendants for trademark infringement and counterfeiting, finding a likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-09
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order failed due to procedural deficiencies and substantive defects in the complaint and motion.
-
A temporary injunction must be reversed when the moving party fails to establish all four required elements—likelihood of irreparable harm, lack of adequate remedy at law, substantial likelihood of success on the merits, and consideration of the public interest—by competent subst
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-05-07
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining the defendant from using the plaintiff's trademarks on counterfeit goods and restraining the defendant's assets.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-05-01
The court granted the application for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiffs satisfied the requirements for its issuance.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-01
The court granted the motion to convert the temporary restraining order into a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiff established a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, a favorable balance of harms, and that the injunction would serve t
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-24
The court granted in part Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its trade secret misappropriation claims under the DTSA.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-23
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiffs failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for any of their claims.
-
The court recommended granting the motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiffs demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of their trademark infringement claims, irreparable injury, a favorable balance of harms, and that the injunction serves th
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-18
A plaintiff challenging DHS termination of F-1 student status in SEVIS is likely to succeed on an APA claim where the termination lacks statutory or regulatory authority under 8 C.F.R. § 214.1(d) and is arbitrary and capricious. A temporary restraining order is warranted where th
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-18
The court granted the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order, finding he was likely to succeed on the merits of his claims that his SEVIS record was unlawfully terminated.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish entitlement to preliminary injunctive relief, denying his motion for release from wing restriction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-09
The court granted the parties' joint motion for a consent judgment and permanent injunction, finding it lawful and reasonable.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-09
iCore Midco Inc. and iCoreConnect Inc. sought an ex parte temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against PIGI Solutions, LLC and John Schneller to prevent a foreclosure auction sale of their personal property pursuant to a security agreement. The district court de
-
The court held that a preliminary injunction is warranted because the plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its breach of contract claim, irreparable injury, and that the balance of harms and public interest favored the injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-01
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish entitlement to preliminary injunctive relief due to procedural and substantive deficiencies in his motion.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for a preliminary injunction because he did not allege sufficient facts to show the private towing company acted under color of state law.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-27
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order was moot due to his transfer and that his motion for appointment of counsel was denied as there were no exceptional circumstances.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-25
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits due to an impermissible mandatory injunction request and failed to show imminent irreparable injury due to significant, unexplained delays.
-
The court recommends granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff has demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its trademark infringement claims and will suffer irreparable injury if relief is not granted.
-
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and sought relief beyond preserving the status quo.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-20
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because it was not supported by evidence and the plaintiff had not served the defendants.
-
Plaintiff Raymond Alex Myer, an involuntarily committed resident of the Florida Civil Commitment Center, sought a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against six FCCC officers, alleging they assaulted him. The court denied the motion, finding that Myer failed t
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-03-14
The court granted in part the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable injury if the vessel is transferred or moved.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-14
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for injunctive relief because they failed to establish the necessary requirements for such an order.
-
A temporary injunction order is legally insufficient and must be reversed and remanded when it fails to contain clear and sufficient factual findings supporting each of the four required elements and fails to require a bond, as mandated by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b)
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-03-06
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's application for a preliminary injunction due to strong evidence of trademark infringement and counterfeiting by the non-responding defendants.