3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
Del. Ch.·
2025-03-03
The court denied Project44's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that while Project44 was likely to succeed on its breach of contract claims, it failed to demonstrate a likelihood of irreparable harm. The alleged harm, primarily lost revenue from a single customer accoun
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-03
The court granted the parties' joint motion for a stipulated permanent injunction, resolving the injunctive relief sought by the plaintiff.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-02-25
The court held that a plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction or writ of mandamus must establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, which the plaintiff failed to do.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-02-24
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's application for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits of its patent infringement claim and will suffer irreparable harm without the requested relief.
-
A seller of a restaurant failed to disclose unpaid sales and use taxes to the buyer. The buyer obtained a preliminary injunction freezing the seller's assets to prevent her alleged flight to Venezuela. The appellate court reversed, holding that a monetary judgment for breach of c
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion to convert a temporary restraining order into a preliminary injunction, finding that all four factors for injunctive relief weighed in the plaintiff's favor.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-02-12
The court denied the defendant's motion to stay a preliminary injunction pending appeal, finding the defendant failed to establish any of the four required elements.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-02-11
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-02-07
In this default judgment case, the district court adopted the magistrate judge's report and granted plaintiff's motion for final default judgment, making a preliminary injunction permanent and awarding $450,000 in combined actual and punitive damages against defendants who failed
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-02-07
The court held that the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction was denied without prejudice due to failure to comply with procedural requirements.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-02-07
The court accepted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, denying the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-02-03
A civil action cannot be commenced by filing a motion for temporary restraining order without an accompanying complaint.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-01-31
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting TLM Global's motion for a preliminary injunction and denying Fokiss's motion.
-
The court recommended denying the plaintiffs' emergency motion for a preliminary injunction because they failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or a substantial threat of actual and imminent irreparable injury.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the requested relief was against a non-party and the plaintiff failed to meet the necessary legal standards.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-01-30
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, a prerequisite for a preliminary injunction, due to judicial immunity.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-01-28
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to stay an appraisal process because it was not properly before the court and the plaintiff failed to meet the requirements for injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-01-17
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-01-17
The court denied the defendant's motion to dismiss, finding that the complaint stated a claim for fraud under the CEA and that the court had personal jurisdiction over the defendant due to nationwide service of process under the CEA and the defendant's minimum contacts with the U
-
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the defendant agreed not to terminate the plaintiff's designation and the plaintiff is now compliant with fee obligations, rendering the request moot.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-01-07
The court denied the request for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) because the defendant had appeared and responded to the motion. The request for a preliminary injunction was taken under advisement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-01-06
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to carry his burden of persuasion regarding the balance of hardships.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-01-02
The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because she failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, demonstrate irreparable harm without an adequate legal remedy, provide for security, a
-
Mohammed Alsaloussi and Alsaloussi Holdings, LLC appealed a trial court's order granting an emergency temporary injunction that prohibited them from liquidating, selling, or disposing of a 2018 Porsche 911 Turbo Classic pending final judgment. The appellate court affirmed the inj
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-12-31
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants for trademark and patent infringement and counterfeiting.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-12-30
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of her Administrative Procedure Act claim, thus denying her motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction because they failed to meet the required legal standard and procedural rules.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-12-20
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and granted the Plaintiff's motion for a Temporary Restraining Order.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-12-19
Aspire Health Partners, a nonprofit healthcare provider holding trademark registrations for "ASPIRE HEALTH PARTNERS," "ASPIRE HEALTH," and "ASPIRE," sought a preliminary injunction against Aspire MGT LLC, a nursing home operator using the similar mark "ASPIRE HEALTH GROUP" on its
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-12-18
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, freezing the defendant's assets and restraining transactions related to the plaintiff's accounts, due to a strong likelihood of success on a breach of contract claim and irreparable harm.
-
A trial court must conduct an evidentiary hearing on a motion for temporary injunction to afford parties procedural due process through fair notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state an Eighth Amendment claim against the medical defendant and denied his request for injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-12-16
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, a favorable balance of harms, and that the injunction serves the public interest.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction was denied because it failed to comply with local rules regarding factual support and legal argument.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-12-06
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's design patent and ordering various third parties to assist in enforcing the injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-11-27
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a strong likelihood of success on the merits of trademark and patent infringement claims.
-
Although a trial court properly dismisses a complaint for lack of standing of unincorporated entities and failure to allege individualized harm, it must grant leave to amend where only one amendment has been filed, the opposing party would not be prejudiced, and amendment would n
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-11-25
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's patent and ordering various third parties to disable infringing operations and provide discovery.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-11-22
The court recommended granting the Receiver's eleventh application for fees and expenses, authorizing payment from the Receivership Estate.
-
The court granted the defendants' motion to deny the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction as moot and for failure to comply with local rules.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-11-21
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's application for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-11-19
The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for entry of final default judgment against defendants for copyright infringement, trademark counterfeiting, false designation of origin, and unfair competition.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-11-19
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining Defendants from infringing on Plaintiff's design patents and ordering the preservation and restraint of assets.
-
2005 WL 8155858·
M.D. Fla.·
2024-11-18
The court granted Plaintiff's motion to extend the Temporary Restraining Order because good cause exists to allow additional time for service on the Defendants.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2024-11-15
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits of his Eighth Amendment claim.
-
Former employees of Hydrologic Distribution Company appeal a trial court's grant of a temporary injunction preventing them from competing with their former employer and soliciting its customers and employees. The appellate court affirmed, holding that Hydrologic established legit
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a plausible claim for false arrest or denial of medical care, and also failed to meet the requirements for injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-11-08
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's patent and copyright.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-11-08
The court recommended granting a preliminary injunction against defendants for trademark counterfeiting and infringement, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-10-25
The court held that a motion for preliminary injunction must comply with notice requirements, and failure to provide notice is sufficient grounds for denial.