Preliminary Injunction

3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Thompson v. Centurion of Fla. LLC
  N.D. Fla.· 2024-10-23
  The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and a substantial threat of irreparable injury.
• Infinity Cap. Income Fund, LLC v. Nguyen
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-10-23
  The court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to conduct limited expedited discovery.
• Song v. 1
  2005 WL 8155858· M.D. Fla.· 2024-10-21
  The court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff's motion to extend and modify the Temporary Restraining Order.
• Abs-Cbn Corp. v. hdmvs.top
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-10-08
  The court recommended granting the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm if relief is not granted.
• Song v. 1
  2005 WL 8155858· M.D. Fla.· 2024-10-07
  The court granted Plaintiff's motion to extend the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) because Plaintiff has not yet served the Defendants and needs additional time to obtain information through expedited discovery.
• Swiler v. RSJ Ventures, LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-09-30
  The court denied plaintiff's motions for default judgment and preliminary injunctive relief because they were procedurally improper and premature.
• Socket Solutions, LLC v. Imp. Global, LLC
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-29
  The Court affirmed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and overruling Defendant's objections.
• Pringle v. Seminole Cnty. Pub. Schs.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-09-23
  The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary injunction because it failed to comply with procedural rules and substantive requirements.
• Fleming v. Strong
  N.D. Fla.· 2024-09-18
  The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissing claims against certain defendants for improper joinder, recommending remand.
• Thomas v. Beadle
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-09-17
  The court held that a motion for preliminary injunction cannot be used to obtain final relief on the merits without hearing from the opposing party.
• McMinn v. ATP Flight Acad., LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-09-16
  The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that notice and a hearing were impractical or impossible. The court will consider the preliminary injunction request after defendants are served and have an opportunity to r
• Marques Machado v. Mayorkas
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-09-13
  The court granted in part Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order, finding they established a substantial likelihood of success on their APA claim and demonstrated irreparable harm, a favorable balance of harms, and that the order would not disserve the public intere
• Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC v. Hoffner
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-13
  The court recommended denying the motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to meet the requirements for ex parte relief and the request for a preliminary injunction was premature due to lack of notice.
• Socket Solutions, LLC v. Imp. Global, LLC
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-09
  The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, finding a likelihood of success on the merits regarding patent infringement and validity.
• On Clouds GmbH v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-08
  The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm if relief is not granted.
• Smith v. Fla. Agric. & Mech. Univ. Bd. of Trs.
  N.D. Fla.· 2024-08-30 ·via Preliminary Injunction Standard
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial threat of irreparable injury, which is a prerequisite for preliminary injunctive relief.
• Smith v. Fla. Agric. & Mech. Univ. Bd. of Trs.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-08-30 ·via Preliminary Injunction Standard
  The court held that a plaintiff must establish a substantial threat of irreparable injury to obtain a preliminary injunction, and that economic harm and reputational damage from termination are not considered irreparable.
• Mainsail Parent, LLC v. Jewell
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-08-26
  The court granted in part the motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining two former employees from soliciting or serving the plaintiff's customers and from soliciting or hiring former employees, based on their breach of restrictive covenants.
• Kaws, Inc. v. Printify, Inc.
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-08-23
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for its trademark infringement claims, and therefore denied the motion for a preliminary injunction.
• Aquino v. Rivero
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-08-20
  The court denied the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief, construing it as a request for a temporary restraining order (TRO) or preliminary injunction.
• Props. of the Villages, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-08-15 ·via Preliminary Injunction Standard
  The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and stay, enjoining the FTC from enforcing its non-compete clause rule against the plaintiff.
• Marques Machado v. Mayorkas
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-08-14
  The court held that the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction must be denied because they failed to comply with federal and local rules regarding notice and procedural requirements for such relief.
• Allen v. Sutton
  N.D. Fla.· 2024-08-09
  The court recommended denying the motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable injury.
• Tushbaby, Inc. v. The Corps.
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-08-08
  Joinder of multiple defendants in an intellectual property infringement action is improper under Rule 20 when the plaintiff only alleges that each defendant infringes the same intellectual property without demonstrating that the claims arise from the same transaction or occurrenc
• Griffin v. Calderon
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-08-07
  The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction must be denied because it failed to comply with federal and local rules regarding notice to the adverse party.
• Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-08-07
  The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, a favorable balance of harms, and that the injunction serves the public interest.
• Marques Machado v. Mayorkas
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-08-05
  The court denied plaintiffs' motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because they failed to comply with procedural rules regarding notice and certification.
• Intra Mgmt. Solutions, Inc. v. Schnairsohn
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-08-02
  The court granted in part Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, finding that the defendant's alleged defamatory statements were made in furtherance of tortious interference and met the criteria for injunctive relief.
• Purple Innovation, LLC v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-07-29
  The court granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from using plaintiff's trademarks and patents in connection with counterfeit products.
• Wang v. The P'ships & Unincorporated Orgs. in Schedule A
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-07-24 ·via Preliminary Injunction Standard
  The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction.
• CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Labuhn
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-07-22
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish entitlement to a preliminary injunction because the alleged harm was speculative and the balance of hardships did not favor the plaintiff.
• Semper Foods, LLC v. Ouellette
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-07-19
  The court accepted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.
• Abdul v. Inch
  N.D. Fla.· 2024-07-16
  The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to explain the significant delay in seeking emergency relief.
• Goorin Bros., Inc. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-07-15
  The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a strong probability of success on the merits and the likelihood of irreparable harm to the plaintiff.
• Sansoni v. Orange Cnty. Sch. Bd.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-07-12
  The court denied the plaintiff's motion for sanctions without prejudice because it failed to comply with the procedural and substantive requirements for a preliminary injunction or sanctions.
• Clark v. Pinellas Cnty. Sheriff Dep't
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-07-12 ·via Preliminary Injunction Requirements
  The court held that the pro se plaintiff's complaint failed to state a claim and must be dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend to pursue claims arising from his time in the Pinellas County jail.
• Q. Grady Minor & Assocs., LLC v. Blueshore Eng'g, LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-07-10
  The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its trade secret misappropriation claims and a likelihood of irreparable injury.
• Bunny's Cabaret, LLC v. Pinellas Cnty.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-07-09
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its First Amendment challenge to the county's closing time ordinance.
• Marcala LLC v. RVLock & Co, LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-07-01 ·via Preliminary Injunction Standard
  The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and showed undue delay in seeking relief.
• Redbird Cap. P'rs Platform LP v. C.A. No. 2024-0274-SG Concorde Parent, LP
  Del. Ch.· 2024-06-28
  The Court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, holding that the dispute over billed-but-not-booked capital expenditures (BBNB CapEx) must first be submitted to an independent expert as provided by the contract, rather than being adjudicated by the court. Th
• More Auto. Prods., Inc. v. Dollar Rent A Car, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-06-27
  The court held that a preliminary injunction should not be granted because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable injury, despite the application of Puerto Rico's Law 75.
• 92 On The Bay, LLC v. The River Front Master Ass'n, Inc.
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2024-06-26 ·via Temporary Injunction
  92 On The Bay, LLC, the winning bidder at a tax deed auction, appeals a temporary injunction granted to The River Front Master Association, Inc., preventing the sale of property deemed a common area of a planned community. The court affirmed the injunction, finding no abuse of di
• Ashton v. Parker House Props., Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-06-21
  The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to meet the required legal standards for such relief.
• In re Amendments to the Fla. Supreme Court Approved Fam. Law Forms—12.980(a)
  Fla.· 2024-06-20 ·via Temporary Injunction
  The Court amended nine Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms by removing language requiring notary verification in accordance with amendments to sections 741.30, 784.046, and 784.0485, Florida Statutes. The Court also made other changes to improve clarity and promote co
• Simmons v. USI Ins. Servs. LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-06-18
  The court held that restrictive covenants in employment agreements were lawful, valid, and enforceable, and that former employees breached these covenants by failing to provide notice and by soliciting clients and employees.
• Thalle Constr. Co., Inc. v. Charlotte Cnty.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-06-10
  The court denied Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because Plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
• State v. Ctrs. for Medicare & Medicaid Servs.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-05-31
  The court held that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction due to a statutory review scheme, precluding district court review of Florida's claims regarding CMS FAQs.
• Phildius v. The Individuals
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-05-30
  The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from infringing on her copyrighted works.
• Copon v. Ho
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-05-20
  The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction because they failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
• Fokiss, Inc. v. TLM Global, LLC
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-05-01
  The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the defendants' motion to determine no irreparable harm before a preliminary injunction hearing.