3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-04-29
The court recommended denying the defendants' motion to determine no irreparable harm without an evidentiary hearing.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-04-15
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting defendants' motions to dismiss in part and denying them in part without prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-03-29
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction and granting Defendants' motion to dismiss Count IV (RFA claim) with leave to replead.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-03-29
The court denied the defendant's motion for an extension of time to respond to a motion to enforce a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-03-15
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction was denied because it failed to comply with local rules and did not meet the required legal standard for injunctive relief.
-
Amendments to a condominium declaration that reduce the voting threshold for termination materially alter unit owners' voting rights and cannot be adopted without the 100% approval required by the declaration for amendments affecting voting rights. Unit owners demonstrated a subs
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-03-11
The court denied the request for an ex parte temporary restraining order due to insufficient evidence of irreparable harm and speculative reasoning. The court deferred ruling on the preliminary injunction and set an expedited hearing.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-03-11
The court granted summary judgment for Lincare on claims of conversion, civil theft, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of loyalty, and breach of contract, and converted the preliminary injunction to a permanent injunction.
-
A temporary restraining order is denied because the plaintiff failed to clearly establish irreparable harm and that the order would not disserve the public interest.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-03-06
The State of Florida challenged agency action by filing a motion for preliminary injunction and faced a motion to dismiss. The district court, reviewing the magistrate judge's report and recommendation de novo, determined that the case lacked final agency action and dismissed the
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-03-05
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff failed to meet the requirements for ex parte relief and did not demonstrate irreparable harm. The court deferred ruling on the preliminary injunction pending a hearing.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-03-01
The court held that it could not order a special election for School Board Districts 4 and 6 because the request exceeded the scope of the claims presented in the original complaint and was improper at this post-judgment stage.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-02-29
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's trademarks and ordering the restraint of financial accounts used in the infringement.
-
The court held that a prisoner's motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order was denied because it was not supported by a civil action, and the prisoner failed to file a complaint or pay the filing fee.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and order restraining transfer of assets.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-02-06
The Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and order restraining transfer of assets.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2024-01-31
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of establishing standing for a preliminary injunction because the asserted injury was speculative and not imminent.
-
A quorum does not exist when recused commissioners are excluded from the count, and the 120-day absence period under the City Charter begins on the date of the first missed meeting, not the day after the last attended meeting.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2024-01-31
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of establishing standing for a preliminary injunction because the asserted injuries were speculative and not imminent.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-01-30
The court denied the plaintiff's construed motion for class certification. The court also reviewed the amended complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for frivolousness, failure to state a claim, or seeking relief from immune defendants.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-01-30
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiff satisfied the requirements for such relief.
-
Del. Ch.·
2024-01-25
The Court granted Plaintiffs' motion for sanctions for spoliation of evidence, shifting Plaintiffs' reasonable fees incurred in preparing for and attending the evidentiary hearing where Mr. Cusick provided false testimony. The Court also ruled that it would draw relevant inferenc
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-01-24
The court denied the inmate's motion for an injunction because it was not related to the claims in the operative complaint and involved matters of prison administration. The court also ordered defense counsel to confer with the plaintiff regarding video footage.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-01-23
The court held that the plaintiffs' motions for class certification and preliminary injunction were moot due to the filing of an amended complaint.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-01-22
The court held that the amended complaint adequately stated claims for trademark infringement and unfair competition, but dismissed claims for injunctive relief and attorney's fees as standalone causes of action.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-01-22
The court recommended granting a preliminary injunction against defendants for trademark counterfeiting and infringement, finding a strong likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-01-18
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish irreparable harm and other prerequisites for a preliminary injunction, thus denying the motion.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-01-11
The court held that the inmate's motions for a temporary restraining order were denied because he failed to meet the prerequisites for injunctive relief and sought matters outside the scope of the operative complaint.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-01-09
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, enjoining defendants from placing holds on academic records or preventing class enrollment.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-01-08
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the denial of a preliminary injunction and his request for appointment of pro bono counsel.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-01-02
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate entitlement to injunctive relief.
-
Del. Ch.·
2023-12-22
The Court grants Sunder Energy, LLC's application to certify its prior 'Injunction Decision' for interlocutory appeal. Although typically interlocutory rulings on preliminary injunctions are not appealable, this decision effectively dismissed the bulk of Sunder's claims, making i
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-12-22
The court denied the plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order/preliminary injunction and for increased law library access, but granted his motion for leave to amend his complaint.
-
The court held that the complaint must be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff failed to adequately invoke federal question or diversity jurisdiction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-12-18
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of trademark infringement and counterfeiting claims. The court determined that irreparable injury would occur if the injunction was not granted, the ba
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-12-18
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the federal power of eminent domain to condemn easements necessary for its pipeline relocation project and granted FGT immediate possession via preliminary injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-12-18
The court recommends that the District Court enter the proposed order for a preliminary injunction based on the parties' joint stipulation.
-
The court recommended extending the temporary restraining order and approving an agreement between the temporary receiver and certain defendants.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-12-13
The court held that the plaintiff's amended complaint was a shotgun pleading and failed to comply with court orders, and his motions for injunctive relief and appointment of counsel were denied.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-12-07
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the requirements for injunctive relief and did not properly initiate a civil rights action.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-12-06
The court held that the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards mandates arbitration of the dispute, as the four jurisdictional prerequisites are met and the plaintiff's defenses are unavailing.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-12-06
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from infringing on the adidas trademarks and ordering the restraint of assets.
-
Charles Baldwin, a former manager for Express Oil Change franchises who received nearly $2 million in a sale of business assets, challenged a restrictive covenant limiting his ability to compete as unreasonable under Georgia law. The Eleventh Circuit held that the covenant's geog
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-12-05
The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction and denied the motion for a preliminary injunction without prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-12-04
The court granted a Temporary Restraining Order, finding plaintiffs had a substantial likelihood of success on their claims for violation of the Defend Trade Secrets Act and tortious interference with business relationships, and that irreparable harm would result from disclosure
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-12-03
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining the defendant from manufacturing, selling, or distributing infringing and counterfeit goods bearing the plaintiff's trademarks.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-12-01
The court granted the plaintiffs' ex parte application for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of their copyright infringement claim and the potential for irreparable harm.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-11-30
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order because the requests were moot and the court lacked jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus.
-
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction because the balance of harm weighed against granting the relief.
-
A temporary injunction is defective and reversible when the trial court fails to set a bond as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b), and on remand the court must set an appropriate bond after providing all parties an opportunity to present evidence on the proper a