1,544 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 167 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-12-10
The court granted default judgment and a permanent injunction against defendants for committing wire fraud, finding sufficient basis in the pleadings and proper jurisdiction.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2021-11-24
Barbara Namon, as personal representative of her late husband's estate, appealed the denial of a motion for temporary injunction seeking to recover a valuable Winslow Homer painting from Sotheby's. The decedent's children claimed ownership through an inter vivos gift, while Barba
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-11-23
The court held that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, thus denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2021-11-20
The court held that the State of Florida failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of irreparable injury, a prerequisite for injunctive relief, as the alleged harms were speculative or economic.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-11-19
The Court denies Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because she failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-11-18
Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc., and Costa Del Mar, Inc. sued 138 defendants for counterfeiting and infringing their registered trademarks by advertising, promoting, and selling counterfeit eyewear and related products through online marketplaces and websites. The court gran
-
AmeriGas Propane appeals a trial court's denial of a motion for temporary injunctive relief against former employee Nelson Sanchez and his new employer Blossman Gas for alleged breach of non-compete and non-solicitation agreements. The appellate court reverses, finding that Ameri
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-25
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because it sought a mandatory injunction, which carries a heightened burden not met by the plaintiff, and because courts generally defer to prison administration.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-10-15
The court held that a federal habeas petition challenging ongoing state criminal proceedings must be dismissed under the Younger abstention doctrine and for failure to state a claim.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-10-14
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and expedited discovery, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for fraud and negligence claims, irreparable injury, and that the balance of harms and public interest favored the TRO.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-10-14
The court granted YETI's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from manufacturing, selling, or distributing counterfeit YETI products and requiring them to cease using YETI's trademarks online.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-12
The court held that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, a necessary element for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that a motion for preliminary injunction must comply with local rules and that the plaintiff failed to establish irreparable harm due to significant delay.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-04
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish the necessary elements for a temporary injunction, specifically a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable injury.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-01
The court denied the motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order due to procedural deficiencies and deferred ruling on the preliminary injunction pending service of process on the defendants.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2021-09-29
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, adopting the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-09-28
YETI Coolers, LLC obtained a temporary restraining order against 60 defendants operating websites that advertised and sold counterfeit YETI-branded products in violation of the Lanham Act. The court found that YETI demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, i
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-09-27
The court held that the defendant failed to establish the necessary elements for a preliminary injunction, affirming the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to deny the motion.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2021-09-27
The court held that the prisoner's motion for injunctive relief must be denied and the case dismissed because he is a "three-striker" under the PLRA and failed to demonstrate imminent danger or pay the filing fee.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-09-24
The court granted in part the plaintiffs' ex parte application for a temporary restraining order, restraining defendants from infringing on plaintiffs' trademarks, but denied the request for a seizure order.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-09-21
McGriff Insurance Services sought a preliminary injunction against several former employees and a competitor, Alliant Insurance Services, alleging breaches of non-solicitation and confidentiality provisions in employment agreements, as well as tortious interference and trade secr
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-09-17
The court granted Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis in the pleadings for copyright infringement, civil conspiracy, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violation of Florida's Sexual Cyberharassment Law, and also gr
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-08-27
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction because it failed to comply with procedural rules and substantive requirements for injunctive relief.
-
The appellate court affirmed a trial court's order granting a temporary injunction against the collection of school impact fees. The court found that the appellees demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and a likelihood of irreparable harm, which are neces
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-07-22
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis in the pleadings and evidence for liability on trademark counterfeiting, infringement, false designation of origin, common law unfair competition, and copyright infringement claims.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2021-07-11
Florida's ban on written or electronic advertisements encouraging consumers to contact contractors or public adjusters regarding insurance claims for roof damage violates the First Amendment as an impermissible restriction on commercial speech that fails intermediate scrutiny. Th
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-07-06
The court granted in part and denied in part the Plaintiff's Motion for Final Default Judgment. The court found that the Plaintiff had stated plausible claims for trademark infringement and false designation of origin under the Lanham Act, and for unfair competition under FDUTPA.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project and is entitled to immediate possession through a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn the necessary easements for its pipeline project and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its pipeline project and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession upon FGT's deposit of security.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project and is entitled to immediate possession via preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court granted partial summary judgment, establishing the plaintiff's right to condemn easements, and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession, finding the project served the public interest and that irreparable harm would result from delays.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that the plaintiff, Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC, has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project under the Natural Gas Act and is entitled to a preliminary injunction granting immediate possession.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court granted the plaintiff's motions for partial summary judgment and a preliminary injunction, establishing the plaintiff's right to condemn easements and granting immediate possession for pipeline construction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court granted partial summary judgment, establishing the plaintiff's right to condemn easements, and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession to allow construction of a natural gas pipeline.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its pipeline project under the Natural Gas Act and is entitled to immediate possession via preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project under the Natural Gas Act and is entitled to immediate possession via preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court granted summary judgment, establishing FGT's right to condemn easements, and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession, finding that FGT met the statutory requirements and the standard for injunctive relief.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2021-06-30
The court held that certain provisions of Florida's social media law are likely preempted by federal law (47 U.S.C. § 230) or violate the First Amendment, warranting a preliminary injunction against their enforcement.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-06-15
The court granted plaintiff's motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis for liability and awarding statutory damages and injunctive relief.
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2021-06-11
The trial court erred in concluding that physicians did not violate a nonsolicitation provision prohibiting treatment of former patients of Tampa Pain Relief Center during a twenty-four-month restricted period without written consent, where evidence showed the doctors treated 644
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-05-28
The Court granted Plaintiff's motion for entry of final default judgment against Defendants.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-05-20
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining Defendants from using Plaintiff's trademarks and copyrighted works and restraining their financial accounts.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-05-18
The court held that Florida failed to establish standing to seek a preliminary injunction against federal immigration enforcement policies, as its claimed injuries were speculative and not concrete.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-05-14
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits of their trademark infringement claim and will suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-05-06
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis in the pleadings and evidence to establish defendants' liability for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-04-23
The court denied the application for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial threat of irreparable injury due to an unexplained, significant delay in seeking enforcement of its trademark rights.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2021-04-21
The appellate court reversed a temporary injunction that ordered the removal of a boat, finding that the party seeking the injunction failed to present sufficient evidence to support the required legal elements. The case was remanded for an evidentiary hearing.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2021-04-21
Appellants challenged a trial court's nonfinal order granting a temporary injunction requiring them to remove their boat from a boat lift. The appellate court reversed, finding that appellees failed to present competent, substantial evidence supporting the required elements for i