1,544 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 167 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-01-12
The court held that the complaint was a shotgun pleading and dismissed it without prejudice, granting leave to amend.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-11-21
The court granted an ex parte temporary restraining order because the petitioner demonstrated a likelihood of success on his Hague Convention claim, irreparable injury, a favorable balance of harms, and that the relief sought would not be adverse to the public interest.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-11-16
The court granted the ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, prohibiting the removal of the minor children from the court's jurisdiction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-11-15
The court denied the plaintiff's motions for clerk's default, permanent injunction, and summary judgment, and granted the plaintiff's motion to remove the demand for jury trial and monetary damages. The court granted in part and denied in part the defendant's motion to dismiss, d
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-11-08
The court denied the plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because they failed to meet the procedural requirements for such relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-11-01
The court denied the defendants' motion for a stay pending appeal because they failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm, and the balance of equities weighed against a stay.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-11-01
The court held that the inmate's filing was insufficient for injunctive relief and did not properly initiate a civil rights action.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-10-28
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order because he failed to meet the required legal standards and procedural requirements.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-10-24
The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because it was procedurally and substantively deficient.
-
The court held that a motion for an emergency temporary restraining order (TRO) must be denied when it fails to meet the strict requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b), including showing immediate and irreparable injury, providing a sworn affidavit, giving proper no
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-09-29
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding it appropriate based on the parties' stipulation and the likelihood of success on the merits of trademark infringement claims.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-09-28
The court granted the ex parte application for a temporary restraining order, finding the petitioner demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, a favorable balance of hardships, and that the order would serve the public interest.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-09-26
The court denied the motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order because the plaintiffs failed to meet the stringent requirements for such relief. The court deferred ruling on the preliminary injunction pending the defendants' response.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-09-15
The district court denied the government's motion for a partial stay pending appeal of an order appointing a special master and enjoining certain uses of seized materials.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-09-14
Seaway Biltmore and its affiliated partnership sought certiorari to quash a trial court's adoption of a special magistrate's report imposing discovery sanctions and instructing the jury to presume that intentionally destroyed IT records were unfavorable to the defendants. The Thi
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-09-05
Former President Trump sought judicial oversight and the appointment of a special master to review documents and personal items seized from his residence in an FBI search on August 8, 2022, citing concerns about privilege protections and the return of personal property. The court
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2022-08-24
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-08-10
The court held that the plaintiff's amended complaint was a shotgun pleading subject to dismissal and that she was not entitled to injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-08-09
A ten-year-old boy with non-communicative autism filed a civil rights lawsuit after being handcuffed and transported to a psychiatric facility by a school resource officer in 2018, claiming violations of the Fourth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, and the Americans with Disabilit
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2022-07-15
The appellate court dismissed a petition for a writ of certiorari or mandamus seeking to compel a jury trial in a small claims case. The court found it lacked jurisdiction to review the trial court's order denying the jury trial, even though the denial was unclear.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-30
An inmate incarcerated in Florida sought damages against a prison physician under the Eighth Amendment for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, claiming the physician failed to reissue specialist-prescribed medical passes following shoulder surgery, refused to pursue
-
The appellate court reversed a trial court's denial of a temporary injunction, finding that the medical practice, Joseph Spine, P.A., was entitled to a presumption of irreparable harm due to a former physician's (Dr. Moulton) violation of restrictive covenants in his employment a
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-23
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief and ordered him to file an amended complaint because the original complaint was a "shotgun pleading" that failed to state claims with sufficient specificity.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-22
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief because he failed to meet the required legal standards for such relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-10
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because it failed to meet the required procedural and substantive elements.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-06-09
Luxury goods manufacturers Richemont International SA and related companies sued multiple individuals and entities operating online e-commerce stores on Amazon, DHgate, eBay, and Wish for selling counterfeit versions of their trademarked watches, jewelry, and accessories includin
-
The court recommended denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-06-01
The court held that the plaintiff lacked standing to seek a preliminary injunction because he failed to establish a redressable injury or a credible threat of enforcement of the UCCJEA judgment.
-
Unit owners challenged a special assessment levied by Star Lakes Association to fund reconstruction of Building 12 after a fire, arguing the assessment was invalid because it should have been limited to Building 12 residents or required a community-wide vote. The trial court init
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-05-09
The court held that there are genuine issues of material fact regarding the enforceability of restrictive covenants and the alleged breach, thus denying summary judgment on these claims.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-05-09
The court granted Permobil's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding it met the four-part test for such relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-04-28
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because he failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-04-05
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for entry of final default judgment against the defendants for trademark counterfeiting and infringement, false designation of origin, cybersquatting, and common-law unfair competition and trademark infringement. The court found that the d
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-04-04
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the burden of persuasion for the four prerequisites of injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-03-28
The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation, granting summary judgment for BMW NA on most counts but denying it on others, and granting Braman's motion on BMW NA's counterclaim.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-03-23
The court held that a claim for breach of a non-solicitation agreement requires specific factual allegations of solicitation, and claims based solely on competition are insufficient if the agreement does not prohibit competition. Tortious interference claims require allegations o
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-03-08
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding statutory damages, injunctive relief, and attorney's fees against defaulting defendants for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-03-08
Arthrex sued its former employee Hilton and competitor Paragon after Hilton left Arthrex to work for Paragon, claiming he had misappropriated trade secrets and violated non-compete restrictions. The court found it had personal jurisdiction over Hilton based on his breach of the c
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-03-03
The court granted the motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiffs have a strong likelihood of success on the merits and are likely to suffer irreparable injury due to the defendants' sale of counterfeit and infringing goods.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-03-01
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits regarding the vaccine mandate.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-02-11
The court held that the plaintiff inmate's filing was insufficient to warrant injunctive relief and dismissed the case without prejudice.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-02-10
The court granted the plaintiff's ex parte application for a temporary restraining order, finding that the plaintiff had demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its trademark infringement claims under the Lanham Act. The court determined that irreparable
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-02-08
The court granted the plaintiff's ex parte application for a temporary restraining order (TRO) against defendants for alleged trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, that i
-
The court held that a plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must demonstrate irreparable harm, and Florida's statutory presumption of irreparable harm for restrictive covenant violations does not apply in federal court.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-01-24
The court denied plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, and struck their amended complaint as an impermissible shotgun pleading.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-01-19
The court granted the motion to dismiss, dismissing the claims for declaratory judgment and negligence.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-01-12
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding statutory damages and a permanent injunction for copyright infringement.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-01-11
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for entry of final default judgment against Defendants for trademark, copyright, and patent infringement.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-12-30
The court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis for default judgment on trademark counterfeiting, infringement, false designation of origin, common law unfair competition, and copyright infringement claims, and awarde
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-12-29
Yeti Coolers, LLC sued multiple defendants for trademark counterfeiting and infringement, false designation of origin, cybersquatting, and unfair competition based on their operation of e-commerce websites selling counterfeit YETI-branded products. The court granted Yeti's motion