1,544 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 167 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-11-08
The court held that a prisoner's allegations of being ignored during a suicide attempt state a plausible claim for deliberate indifference, but a failure to report claim is insufficient without alleging a specific risk of harm.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-11-06
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a strong probability of success on the merits and irreparable harm to the plaintiff.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-11-02
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a Temporary Restraining Order because it failed to meet the procedural and substantive requirements.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-11-02
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis for copyright infringement claims and awarding statutory damages and injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-11-01
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for entry of final default judgment, finding sufficient basis in the pleadings and evidence for liability and awarding injunctive relief and statutory damages.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2023-10-23
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-10-06
The court denied the plaintiffs' emergency motion for a temporary restraining order because they failed to establish standing, the complaint constituted a shotgun pleading, and they did not demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-10-04
The court held that the non-solicitation clause in the operating agreement unambiguously restricts the defendant from soliciting any of the plaintiff's current or prospective clients, and that the restrictive covenants are valid under Florida law.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-09-25
The court denied the inmate's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to meet the heightened burden required for a mandatory injunction and did not act with sufficient alacrity.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-09-19
The court affirmed the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the motion for a preliminary injunction, finding the plaintiff failed to meet the required legal standards.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-09-19
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, awarding statutory damages and injunctive relief against defaulting defendants for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-09-15
The court denied plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction and writ of replevin, and granted in part and denied in part plaintiffs' motion to dismiss defendants' counterclaims, affirming the magistrate judge's report.
-
An order freezing assets in a guardianship proceeding is a temporary injunction subject to rule 1.610, and must include clear, definite factual findings supporting all four elements of the temporary injunction test: (1) likelihood of irreparable harm, (2) lack of adequate remedy
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-08-24
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for entry of final default judgment against Defendants.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-08-21
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against the defendants identified on Schedule A, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-08-17
The court denied plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because it failed to establish the irreparable nature of the threatened injury and the impracticality of providing notice to the defendant.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-08-10
The court granted the defendant's motion to stay proceedings pending appeal, denying the plaintiff's motion to enforce judgment without prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-07-31
The court denied the plaintiff's request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, finding that while there was a likelihood of success on the merits due to admitted defaults, the plaintiff failed to establish irreparable harm and the balance of equities weigh
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-07-18
The court granted default judgment on claims of conversion, unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, and constructive trust, but denied the RICO claim and requested permanent injunction, requiring the plaintiff to submit a precise damages calculation.
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2023-07-12
A trial court's failure to make written findings addressing each of the six statutory factors in section 39.621(10)(c) when denying a parent's motion for reunification constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law causing irreparable harm, warranting certiorari r
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-07-06
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order because it was procedurally deficient and sought relief unrelated to the operative complaint.
-
The Court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining Defendant from operating in specific territories and using Plaintiff's trademarks and trade dress.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-07-01
The court recommends granting in part and denying in part the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis for liability and damages, and proper jurisdiction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-06-28
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis in the pleadings and evidence for liability and awarding statutory damages and injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-06-20
The court granted Bluegreen's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the marketing defendants' deceptive practices violated the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) and that an injunction was necessary to prevent irreparable harm.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-06-14
The Court grants Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for its issuance.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-06-08
The court held that the defendant failed to demonstrate any of the four factors necessary for a stay pending appeal, and therefore denied the motion.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-05-24
A trial court departs from the essential requirements of law by staying proceedings to determine entitlement to foreclosure surplus funds pending resolution of a contractual dispute between claimants in another forum, when section 45.032(3)(b), Florida Statutes, mandates the cour
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-05-24
The appellate court granted a petition for certiorari, quashing a trial court's order that stayed proceedings on surplus foreclosure funds. The court found the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by failing to follow statutory mandates for determining clai
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-05-22
The court granted the parties' joint motion, approving a stipulated final judgment and permanent injunction, finding that the defendants' willful use of counterfeit marks warranted the agreed-upon relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-18
The court granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the defendants violated restrictive covenants by soliciting employees and misappropriating confidential information.
-
-
A party seeking a temporary injunction must establish all five elements—substantial likelihood of success on the merits, likelihood of irreparable harm, unavailability of an adequate remedy at law, that the threatened injury outweighs possible harm, and that issuance will not dis
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-12
The court denied the inmate's motion for a temporary restraining order because he failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or that the requested relief was related to the claims in his operative complaint.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-05-10
The court granted a preliminary injunction against defendants who were properly served, finding a likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm from trademark infringement and counterfeiting.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-01
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order due to multiple procedural deficiencies.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-04-26
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining certain defendants from manufacturing, selling, or transferring infringing products and restraining their assets.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-04-17
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, finding that the well-pleaded allegations established liability for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair competition, and awarded statutory damages and injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-04-14
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction because they failed to demonstrate irreparable injury due to significant delay in seeking the injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-04-10
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defaulting defendants for copyright infringement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-03-28
The court held that the petitioner failed to meet the heightened burden for a mandatory injunction and did not comply with procedural rules.
-
The court held that Plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its trademark infringement claim, justifying a preliminary injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-03-17
The court granted MCINC's application for a preliminary injunction, finding that MCINC is likely to succeed on the merits of its claims for trademark, copyright, and patent infringement and that immediate and irreparable harm would occur if the injunction were not granted.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-03-08
The court held that Oppenheimer failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable injury, and the balance of harms weighed against granting the injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-02-24
The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for default judgment in part, finding sufficient allegations for copyright infringement and removal of copyright management information, and awarding statutory damages and injunctive relief.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2023-02-23
The court accepted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, dismissing the plaintiff's complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with court orders.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-02-17
The court held that plaintiffs have established a substantial likelihood of success on their Title IX claim and will suffer irreparable harm, warranting a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-01-18
The court denied the motion for a restraining order and preliminary injunction because the movant failed to comply with local rules and substantive requirements for such relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-01-18
The court denied the plaintiff's motions for emergency protection and a temporary restraining order/injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-01-18
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order, finding that they demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of their copyright infringement claim and that irreparable harm would occur without immediate relief.