-
889 F.2d 1018·
11th Cir.·
1989-12-06
·cited 112×
The court held that the district court misapplied trademark law by failing to require competition for an infringement claim and by improperly expanding the senior user's geographic rights, thus reversing the denial of a preliminary injunction.
-
875 F.2d 1174·
5th Cir.·
1989-06-27
·cited 15×
The court held that it has jurisdiction to hear the appeal of a preliminary injunction and that the injunction was properly granted. Petrobras is not immune from suit due to a waiver of sovereign immunity in the contract.
-
155 F. Supp. 2d 1327·
M.D. Fla.·
2001-07-30
·cited 7×
The court held that the plaintiff's likelihood of success on the merits of their copyright infringement claim was too tenuous to warrant injunctive relief.
-
801 F. Supp. 633·
S.D. Fla.·
1992-04-02
·cited 2×
The court held that the plaintiff demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits, showing that the state's policy of refusing to fund liver/small bowel transplants was likely unreasonable and the procedure could not be deemed experimental on the current record.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-11-04
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the underlying complaint was insufficient to state a claim.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-22
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or a substantial threat of irreparable injury, thus denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-08
A prisoner's motion for a preliminary injunction was denied because he failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or a substantial threat of irreparable injury.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-01-31
The court recommended denying the plaintiffs' emergency motion for a preliminary injunction because they failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or a substantial threat of actual and imminent irreparable injury.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-07-06
The Court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining Defendant from operating in specific territories and using Plaintiff's trademarks and trade dress.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2022-06-06
The court recommended denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-09-08
Veterinary Orthopedic Implants, Inc. sued its former employee Matthew Haas for breaching a non-compete agreement after he accepted employment with direct competitor Arthrex, Inc., shortly following his termination from VOI. The court granted a preliminary injunction, finding VOI
-
719 F. Supp. 1532·
M.D. Fla.·
1989-06-02
The court held that the plaintiff lacked standing to challenge the resolution, and alternatively, that the resolution did not violate the Establishment Clause and thus a preliminary injunction was not warranted.