1,544 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 167 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-04-15
The court held that the plaintiff inmate failed to meet the requirements for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction and dismissed the case.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-04-14
The court granted the plaintiff's ex parte application for a temporary restraining order (TRO) against defendants for alleged violations of the Lanham Act. The court found that the plaintiff had satisfied the requirements for a TRO, including a substantial likelihood of success o
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-04-02
The magistrate judge recommended granting the plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-03-26
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding statutory damages and injunctive relief against defendants for trademark infringement and unfair competition.
-
The appellate court reversed a lower court's denial of a preliminary injunction, finding that a neighbor's use of a high-powered security camera to surveil a backyard enclosed by a privacy fence could constitute invasion of privacy. The court certified a question of great public
-
This case involves an appeal by Family Heritage Life Insurance Company and two former employees of Combined Insurance Company against a temporary injunction. The appellate court affirmed the injunction, finding that the trial court properly applied the legal standards for issuing
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-03-18
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from infringing on their trademarks.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-03-16
The court held that Pinnacle was not entitled to recover on the injunction bond because it was not wrongfully enjoined, and granted Pinnacle's motion to transfer the case to the Southern District of Florida.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-02-22
The court held that the petitioner failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for injunctive relief regarding his detention under either § 1226(a) or § 1231(a).
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-02-12
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining Defendants from selling infringing goods and ordering the restraint of their financial accounts.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-22
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the burden of persuasion for injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-01-21
A motion for a traditional injunction must be predicated upon a cause of action, and the plaintiff must demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-13
The court held that a Bivens action is not appropriate for injunctive relief against federal prison officials regarding confinement decisions, and the plaintiff failed to demonstrate entitlement to such relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-11
The court held that a prisoner cannot seek injunctive relief for home confinement or conditions of confinement through a Bivens action against federal agencies or supervisory officials.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-05
The court denied the inmate's motion for injunctive relief because he failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, imminent harm, and compliance with procedural rules, especially since the case was dismissed.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-12-20
Michael Kors, L.L.C. and Gianni Versace S.r.l. sued individuals and entities operating online marketplaces for manufacturing, advertising, and selling counterfeit goods bearing their registered trademarks in violation of the Lanham Act. The court granted the plaintiffs' motion fo
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-12-04
The court denied the motion for injunctive relief and dismissed the case without prejudice because the plaintiff failed to properly initiate a civil rights action and did not demonstrate entitlement to the requested relief.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-12-02
The appellate court reviewed a trial court order that imposed restrictions on parties' speech in a family law case. The court found these restrictions, particularly those concerning social media comments and disclosure of financial information, constituted an unconstitutional pri
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-12-02
The court granted Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis in the pleadings and evidence to establish Defendants' liability for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-11-25
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate entitlement to injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-11-17
The court held that the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction was denied because it was unrelated to the claims in the amended complaint and the plaintiffs failed to establish the necessary requirements for such relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-11-13
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis in the pleadings for the judgment.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-11-11
The court held that the Governor's Executive Order mooted most, but not all, of the plaintiffs' claims challenging a county mask ordinance, and dismissed some claims for failure to state a claim.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-11-04
The court denied the inmate's motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction and dismissed the case without prejudice because the inmate failed to meet the requirements for injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-10-21
The court entered a Stipulated Final Permanent Injunction Order, resolving all disputes between Wyndham and the Defendants. The injunction permanently restrains and enjoins the Defendants from engaging in various advertising, marketing, and trade practices related to timeshare in
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-10-19
The court held that the petition for writ of habeas corpus must be dismissed because the petitioner failed to exhaust state remedies and the Younger abstention doctrine applies.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-10-15
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for an injunction and struck her complaint.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-10-13
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from manufacturing, selling, or distributing infringing products and from concealing assets.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2020-10-09
The court found that the Secretary of State's failure to maintain a functional voter registration website and her subsequent limited deadline extension, with insufficient notice, likely violated constitutional rights. The court also determined that the organizational plaintiffs h
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-10-02
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, finding they met the requirements for such relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-09-25
The court granted plaintiffs' ex parte application for a temporary restraining order due to their strong likelihood of success on the merits and the irreparable harm they would suffer from defendants' alleged trademark infringement.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-09-24
The court denied the motion for a stay pending appeal, finding the movant failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or a substantial risk of irreparable injury.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2020-09-16
A petition for mandamus is properly denied when the petitioner fails to show that the trial court had a ministerial duty to perform the requested action, and a petition for certiorari is properly denied when the petitioner fails to demonstrate material injury that cannot be corre
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-09-11
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate entitlement to injunctive relief.
-
Veterinary Orthopedic Implants, Inc. sued its former employee Matthew Haas for breaching a non-compete agreement after he accepted employment with direct competitor Arthrex, Inc., shortly following his termination from VOI. The court granted a preliminary injunction, finding VOI
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-09-03
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish the necessary prerequisites for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-08-31
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff failed to meet the stringent requirements for ex parte relief and failed to address the security bond requirement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-08-21
The court held that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable injury, as an adequate remedy for compensation exists, thus denying their motion for a temporary restraining order.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-08-04
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff failed to meet the procedural and substantive requirements for such an extreme remedy without notice.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-08-03
Plaintiff Chloe Tsakiris Alston sued Stands4 LTD and others for stealing and unlawfully transferring her domain name www.calculator.com, alleging violations of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act and other federal laws. The court denied Stands4's motion to dissolve the
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-08-03
The court denied plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order in both cases.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-07-27
The court granted Plaintiff's expedited ex parte application for a temporary restraining order, requiring the immediate transfer of the domain name back to the Plaintiff.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-07-10
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, allowing him to maintain a fist-length beard.
-
The court held that the plaintiffs established a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for their trademark infringement claims, warranting a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-07-06
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff's delay in seeking relief created the emergency and they failed to meet the requirements for either form of injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-07-01
The court granted SS&C's motion for a preliminary injunction against Conchiglia, enjoining him from misappropriating trade secrets and soliciting SS&C's clients, but denied the motion as to Summit.
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2020-06-25
The appellate court denied a petition for a writ of prohibition, finding that the petitioners had an adequate remedy at law through a pending appeal. The writ was sought to prevent a lower court from proceeding with a declaratory judgment action concerning the constitutionality o
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-06-09
The court held that the plaintiff (FAU) is substantially likely to succeed on its claim that the defendant (Parsont) violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) by intentionally accessing FAU's protected computer system without authorization or exceeding authorized access.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-06-03
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction and granted plaintiffs an opportunity to file a motion to remand.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-05-14
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because he failed to comply with procedural requirements and did not establish a substantial threat of irreparable injury.