TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC
v.
ZHONGSHAN FENGYE ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES CO LTD
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, adopting the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.
The Chief Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, and the parties were given an opportunity to object. No timely objections were filed.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Objections cases and more on FLexlaw
The Chief Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on August 31, 2021 (ECF No. 25). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There are no timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, the undersigned has determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. And in addition to the lack of opposition to the motion, as found by the Chief Magistrate Judge, the Court has reviewed the record and finds Plaintiff has shown (1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (2) that Plaintiff will suffer irreparable injury absent an injunction; (3) that the threatened injury to the Plaintiff outweighs whatever damage the proposed injunction may cause the Defendant; and (4) that “if issued, the injunction would not be adverse to the public interest.” Siegel
v. LePore, 234 F. 3d 1163, 1176 (11th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 25) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, ECF No. 3, is GRANTED pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(H).
3. Plaintiff is required to file a proposed order within fourteen days of entry of this order which is consistent with and incorporates the relief requested in Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of September 2021.