5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding compensatory and exemplary damages and issuing a permanent injunction.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's complaint was an impermissible shotgun pleading and failed to comply with procedural requirements for injunctive relief.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to carry her burden in seeking a preliminary injunction and did not use the proper forms for a civil rights action.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the burden of persuasion for injunctive relief and dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to use the proper civil rights complaint form.
-
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report, granting Monster's motion for a preliminary injunction because VPX's purchase of the 'REIGN' trademark was likely an invalid assignment in gross, meaning Monster, as the first user, likely owns the mark.
-
The court granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the defendant for trademark infringement and price gouging, deferring ruling on a preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that the conditions at the detention centers violated detainees' Fifth and Eighth Amendment rights, and that injunctive relief was appropriate, but the specific remedy of release required further evaluation.
-
The RPO statute permits consideration of relevant evidence including incidents occurring more than 12 months before the petition filing, and an active domestic violence injunction does not prevent entry of an RPO. The trial court's findings were supported by competent, substantia
-
An ex parte temporary restraining order is affirmed when it is facially sufficient, and the appellant retains the right to move for its dissolution with a full hearing required before expiration.
-
The court held that the plaintiff (RJFS) failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits in proving that the defendants were not 'customers' or that the broker was not an 'associated person' under FINRA Rule 12200, thus denying the motion for preliminary i
-
The court granted a preliminary injunction against defendants for trademark counterfeiting and infringement, finding a strong likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
The Eleventh Circuit denied the state's motion for a stay of a preliminary injunction, finding the state had not made a strong showing of likely success on the merits.
-
The court granted the motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their trademark infringement claims.
-
44 Fla. L. Weekly D2420·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-04-22
The appellate court vacated a trial court's order awarding attorneys' fees because the trial court lacked jurisdiction before the appellate court's mandate had issued. The court also modified its own prior fee entitlement order to clarify that the fees are conditioned on the appe
-
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, awarding statutory damages, costs, and a permanent injunction against defendants for copyright infringement.
-
Wilbert R. Hurst, an inmate, sued several Florida Department of Corrections officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of his due process rights, First Amendment retaliation, equal protection, deliberate indifference to medical needs, and intentional infliction of emot
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-04-15
The appellate court affirmed the issuance of permanent injunctions for protection against repeat violence against the Yehezkel brothers. The court found that the evidence presented at the hearing was sufficient to establish two separate incidents of violence as required by Florid
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-04-15
The appellate court affirmed the issuance of permanent injunctions for protection against repeat violence. The court found that the evidence presented sufficiently demonstrated two separate incidents of violence by the appellants against the appellee, meeting the statutory requir
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-04-14
The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and her request to proceed in forma pauperis.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-04-13
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for an extension of time and approved their stipulations for security, ordering them to publish notice to claimants and enjoining further actions against them.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant the FTC's motion for default judgment and permanent injunction against the MOBE Corporate Defendants.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-04-08
The appellate court dismissed the City of Miami Beach's appeal of a partial summary judgment order in favor of Florida Gas Transmission Company. The court found the order was not a final, appealable order and did not qualify as an injunction or grant immediate possession of prope
-
The court granted in part Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order, finding they met the standard for injunctive relief.
-
The court granted default judgment on liability for defamation but denied the request for a permanent injunction, ordering an evidentiary hearing for damages.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, awarding statutory damages and a permanent injunction.
-
The court recommended holding defendants in civil contempt for violating a preliminary injunction, imposing sanctions including attorney's fees, disgorgement of profits, and extension of a non-compete period, contingent on plaintiff prevailing at trial.
-
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because it failed to comply with federal and local rules regarding notice, verification, security, and demonstrating imminent irreparable harm.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, finding insufficient evidence of abusive communications and procedural non-compliance.
-
The Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction in large part, finding they failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits regarding the non-compete, non-solicitation, and business opportunity provisions. The Court granted limited injunctive relief c
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish the necessary elements for a preliminary injunction and did not use the proper procedural form for a civil rights action.
-
The court held that it lacks jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) to review a claim seeking to enjoin the execution of removal orders, even when related to pending provisional waiver applications.
-
A trial court abuses its discretion by dismissing a complaint with prejudice without allowing amendment when the record does not clearly show that amendment would prejudice the opposing party, abuse the privilege to amend, or be futile.
-
The court granted a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of the breach of contract claim due to the violation of an enforceable non-compete agreement.
-
The court denied the motion for injunctive relief and dismissed the case without prejudice.
-
The court held that the insurance policy's Disputes Clause clearly delegates threshold arbitrability issues to the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC), and therefore, the insurer's motion to compel arbitration is granted.
-
The court granted in part and denied in part the motion, issuing a temporary restraining order against defendants for trademark infringement and unfair competition.
-
The court held that the first and fourth affirmative defenses were insufficient as a matter of law and granted Publix's motion to strike them, while denying the motion to strike the seventh affirmative defense.
-
The court held that the plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for breach of contract regarding the return of information and providing services to former clients, but not for trade secret violations.
-
The court held that a request for an injunction to stay a state foreclosure sale was denied because the plaintiff failed to meet procedural requirements and demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits, and because the Anti-Injunction Act barred such relief.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2020-03-04
A circuit court granted a motion to compel a law firm to hold anticipated attorneys' fees in trust pursuant to Florida Bar Rule 5-1.1(f), based on a collateral agreement with a pension fund manager. The appellate court reversed, holding that professional conduct rules do not crea
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-03-04
The court held that the current lawsuit constituted impermissible claim-splitting and was barred by a prior, related case pending in another district.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2020-03-03
The court held that the amended complaint adequately states a claim for an injunction against Centurion of Florida, LLC and an unknown nurse practitioner, but not against the named individual defendants.
-
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction as moot because the plaintiff had been transferred to a different facility.
-
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the dispute likely arose in connection with the business activities of the associated person and that the definition of 'customer' under FINRA rules is broad.
-
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-02-25
PETA sued a Florida zoo (Dade City's Wild Things) alleging violations of the Endangered Species Act through improper treatment of tigers, but after the zoo owners deliberately transferred all their tigers away from the facility in violation of court-ordered discovery obligations,
-
The court denied plaintiffs' motions for a deposition to perpetuate testimony and for an injunction pending appeal, and granted sanctions in part against plaintiffs' counsel.
-
A party cannot obtain a traditional injunction without asserting an independent cause of action.
-
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction because the evidence was in equipoise and the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm without an adequate remedy at law.
-
The court granted an ex-parte temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm due to the threatened dissipation of PACA trust assets.