5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant had the ability to comply with the preliminary injunction, and therefore, the defendant should not be held in contempt.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate entitlement to injunctive relief.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish the necessary prerequisites for a preliminary injunction.
-
This case concerns an appeal by state officials regarding a lower court's decision to vacate an automatic stay on an emergency order related to school reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic. The appellate court found the lower court abused its discretion by vacating the stay, rei
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2020-08-31
This case concerns an appeal by Florida state officials regarding a lower court's decision to vacate an automatic stay on an emergency order related to school reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic. The appellate court reinstated the stay, finding the lower court abused its discr
-
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because they failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, or adequate notice to the defendant.
-
The court held that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable injury, as an adequate remedy for compensation exists, thus denying their motion for a temporary restraining order.
-
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order because it lacked required certifications, failed to demonstrate an emergency, and sought to alter the status quo rather than preserve it.
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2020-08-17
The appellate court reversed a circuit court's judgment in favor of Best Care Assurance, LLC, finding that Best Care failed to exhaust administrative remedies and lacked standing to challenge a contract award. The court affirmed the agency's final order dismissing Best Care's pet
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2020-08-17
The appellate court reversed a circuit court's judgment in favor of Best Care Assurance, LLC, finding that Best Care failed to exhaust administrative remedies and lacked standing to challenge a contract award. The court affirmed an agency's final order dismissing Best Care's peti
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2020-08-17
The appellate court affirmed a lower court's denial of a motion to vacate an injunction. The appellant argued the original injunction was void due to improper service of process as a minor, but the court found the defects were waivable and the injunction was superseded, rendering
-
The court held that a genuine issue of material fact existed regarding whether the homeowners were in violation of the Declaration, precluding summary judgment.
-
Plaintiff Chloe Tsakiris Alston sued Stands4 LTD and others for stealing and unlawfully transferring her domain name www.calculator.com, alleging violations of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act and other federal laws. The court denied Stands4's motion to dissolve the
-
The court denied plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order in both cases.
-
The Court granted the Defendants' Motion to Vacate the status quo order (SQO) and denied the Plaintiffs' Motion to Maintain the SQO pending appeal. The Court found that the SQO, initially entered based on the plaintiff Lynch's allegations, should be vacated because post-trial fin
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2020-07-29
This case involves a condominium owner appealing an injunction allowing the association access to his balcony for restoration work. The appellate court affirmed the injunction but reversed the lower court's failure to require a bond, remanding for consideration of attorney's fees
-
The court held that the defendant's distribution of brochures for an amusement ride confusingly similar to the plaintiff's patented ride constituted a Lanham Act violation, entitling the plaintiff to summary judgment and a permanent injunction.
-
The court granted Plaintiff's expedited ex parte application for a temporary restraining order, requiring the immediate transfer of the domain name back to the Plaintiff.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2020-07-22
A permanent injunction against domestic violence is affirmed when the appellant fails to provide a transcript of the final hearing and fails to show personal bias or prejudice as grounds for judge disqualification.
-
The court appointed a special master to investigate allegations of non-compliance with a preliminary injunction regarding detainee conditions, deferring a ruling on the motion to compel.
-
A trial court must conduct a full evidentiary hearing affording both parties a reasonable opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses before issuing a permanent domestic violence injunction.
-
The court held that the plaintiffs established a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for their trademark infringement claims, warranting a preliminary injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-07-09
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the judgment, finding that reconsideration was not warranted and the Younger abstention doctrine applied to the claims.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-07-06
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff's delay in seeking relief created the emergency and they failed to meet the requirements for either form of injunction.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order because it failed to meet the procedural requirements for notice and security.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because it failed to meet the procedural requirements for ex parte relief.
-
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff failed to meet the procedural requirements for ex parte relief, specifically regarding notice and security.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order because it failed to meet procedural requirements for notice and security.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-06-29
The court held that an ad interim stipulation for security in a limitation of liability action must identify a surety or be accompanied by a letter of undertaking to guarantee payment.
-
A predecessor court maintains jurisdiction to extend a final injunction for protection against domestic violence when the appellant timely petitions for extension prior to the injunction's expiration.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the burden for injunctive relief and dismissed the case without prejudice.
-
An injunction for protection against domestic violence based on alleged cyber-stalking through social media posts must be supported by sufficient factual findings and cannot be broader than necessary to provide relief.
-
-
The court denied the petition to dissolve the immediate suspension order, finding the DEA demonstrated a sufficient factual basis for the suspension.
-
Del. Ch.·
2020-06-22
The Court largely denied cross-motions for partial summary judgment, finding genuine disputes of material fact on key issues including the VGRP Purchase Right, the refusal to approve permanent mortgage financing, and the accrual of preferred returns. The Court granted summary jud
-
The court granted the SEC's motion for permanent injunctions and other relief against defendants Diane Harrison and Michael Daniels, based on their consent to the entry of judgment.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-06-10
The court reversed dismissal of counts I, II, and III (seeking injunctive and declaratory relief against the city and neighbor for zoning violations) because Florida Supreme Court precedent in Boucher v. Novotny permits such equitable actions when a plaintiff alleges special dama
-
The court held that the plaintiff (FAU) is substantially likely to succeed on its claim that the defendant (Parsont) violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) by intentionally accessing FAU's protected computer system without authorization or exceeding authorized access.
-
The court denied the motion for default judgment because the plaintiffs failed to establish a sufficient basis for personal jurisdiction over the defendant.
-
The appellate court reversed a jury's finding that Diageo breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, holding that the breach of contract claim was barred by the express terms of the agreement. The court affirmed the denial of a new trial on fraud and punitive d
-
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction and granted plaintiffs an opportunity to file a motion to remand.
-
This case consolidates two appeals concerning the maintenance and development of condominium community property. The court affirmed the trial court's decisions regarding maintenance assessments and the interpretation of development agreements, finding no abuse of discretion or re
-
The court held that the plaintiff's filing, construed as a motion for a temporary restraining order, failed to meet the necessary legal and procedural requirements and was therefore denied.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, finding the defendants in civil contempt for violating the preliminary injunction and overruling their objections.
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2020-05-21
The amended final judgment is void as to the award of unliquidated damages because due process required an evidentiary hearing or trial on damages after proper notice, which was not provided.
-
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of a temporary injunction. The court found that while the plaintiff might have a valid claim, monetary damages were an adequate remedy, making the extraordinary relief of an injunction unnecessary at this stage.
-
The court granted Buckeye's request for a preliminary injunction, enjoining GT from preventing Buckeye and its customers from accessing the Tanks via Sico Road pending the outcome of the litigation. The court found that Buckeye had a reasonable probability of success on its claim
-
The court held that AvMed failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, a necessary element for a preliminary injunction, because its claimed injuries were either too remote and speculative or compensable by monetary damages.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order because she failed to satisfy the prerequisites for such relief.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because he failed to comply with procedural requirements and did not establish a substantial threat of irreparable injury.