5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court held that a § 2241 habeas petition is not the proper vehicle to challenge the Bureau of Prisons' decision regarding home confinement, and the Administrative Procedure Act does not apply to such claims.
-
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining Defendants from selling infringing goods and ordering the restraint of their financial accounts.
-
The Delaware Court of Chancery denied the motion to dismiss the claims arising under the LLC Agreements but granted a stay of the claims arising under the Employment Agreement, deferring to the identical litigation pending in Louisiana. The court found that the Louisiana action w
-
The court denied defendants' motions to amend judgment and for a stay pending appeal, and granted the Receiver's motion for possession of the homestead property due to defendants' continued non-compliance with prior orders.
-
Injunctive relief is not available against the Small Business Administration or its administrator under 15 U.S.C. § 634(b)(1).
-
Volkswagen Group of America and Audi AG sued Varona and Verotec Wheels for selling counterfeit Audi wheels on eBay that infringed Audi's trademarks and design patent. The court granted summary judgment for Plaintiffs on all four counts of trademark infringement, false designation
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the burden of persuasion for injunctive relief.
-
A motion for a traditional injunction must be predicated upon a cause of action, and the plaintiff must demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits.
-
The court held that a Bivens action is not appropriate for injunctive relief against federal prison officials regarding confinement decisions, and the plaintiff failed to demonstrate entitlement to such relief.
-
The court held that a prisoner cannot seek injunctive relief for home confinement or conditions of confinement through a Bivens action against federal agencies or supervisory officials.
-
The court granted preliminary approval of a class action settlement, certifying the settlement class for settlement purposes and directing notice to class members.
-
The CFTC sued defendants for operating fraudulent binary options and digital assets affiliate marketing schemes that generated millions of dollars in illegal profits through false solicitations and materially misleading promotional content promising guaranteed profits. The court
-
Del. Ch.·
2021-01-07
The court granted Connection's request for a preliminary injunction, converting the existing status quo order into a preliminary injunction. This injunction will remain in effect until the earlier of the final disposition of the action or March 31, 2021, allowing Connection a rea
-
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting default judgment and awarding damages and attorney's fees.
-
A digital advertising business owner challenged a city ordinance prohibiting signs on waterways, arguing it violated the First Amendment by granting city officials unbridled discretion to grant exemptions without objective criteria. The court ruled that the ordinance was an uncon
-
The court denied the inmate's motion for injunctive relief because he failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, imminent harm, and compliance with procedural rules, especially since the case was dismissed.
-
All seven amendments to the master declaration were reasonable and enforceable. The amendments to sections 1.1.26 and 10.13 regarding commercial use restrictions, section 5.1 regarding general rule applicability, section 7.2 regarding assessments, section 10.6 regarding animal re
-
The court held that the city's New Year's Eve curfew, enacted to mitigate COVID-19 spread, was a constitutional time, place, and manner restriction that did not violate First Amendment rights, and thus denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary
-
The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
-
Michael Kors, L.L.C. and Gianni Versace S.r.l. sued individuals and entities operating online marketplaces for manufacturing, advertising, and selling counterfeit goods bearing their registered trademarks in violation of the Lanham Act. The court granted the plaintiffs' motion fo
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2020-12-11
The appellate court reversed a lower court's decision that a property owner had abandoned a nonconforming use of their property. The court held that abandonment requires an intent to permanently cease the use, which was not present when the property was temporarily closed for ren
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, granting the plaintiff's motions for final default judgment, permanent injunction, and damages.
-
The court denied the motion for injunctive relief and dismissed the case without prejudice because the plaintiff failed to properly initiate a civil rights action and did not demonstrate entitlement to the requested relief.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate entitlement to injunctive relief.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for default final judgment and will enter a permanent injunction against the defendant.
-
The court held that the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction was denied because it was unrelated to the claims in the amended complaint and the plaintiffs failed to establish the necessary requirements for such relief.
-
The court held that the Governor's Executive Order mooted most, but not all, of the plaintiffs' claims challenging a county mask ordinance, and dismissed some claims for failure to state a claim.
-
The court held that the plaintiffs' significant delay in seeking a preliminary injunction undermined their claim of irreparable harm, leading to the denial of their motion.
-
The appellate court reversed an injunction protecting an ex-wife from her ex-husband, finding no evidence she feared domestic violence. However, it affirmed injunctions protecting their two minor children, clarifying that these indefinite injunctions do not terminate parental rig
-
The appellate court reversed an injunction granted to an ex-wife but affirmed injunctions granted to two minor children against their father. The court found insufficient evidence to support the injunction for the ex-wife, as she did not allege fear of domestic violence, and clar
-
The appellate court reversed an injunction granted to an ex-wife but affirmed injunctions granted to two minor children against their father. The court clarified that indefinite domestic violence injunctions, while significant, do not constitute a termination of parental rights.
-
The court denied the inmate's motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction and dismissed the case without prejudice because the inmate failed to meet the requirements for injunctive relief.
-
The appellate court reviewed a domestic violence injunction granted by the trial court. While affirming most of the injunction, the court reversed the portion protecting the parties' minor children due to a lack of evidence showing the children were in immediate danger.
-
Defendants Maheshwar Sewpersaud and Usine Rotec, Inc. are held in civil contempt for violating the court's prior orders, and the preliminary injunction is modified to enjoin Sewpersaud globally from working for Rotec.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-11-03
The court held that the defendant failed to establish federal subject-matter jurisdiction, requiring remand to state court.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-10-30
The court adopted in part the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, issuing an Order to Show Cause for contempt and deferring ruling on sanctions and attorney's fees.
-
The court denied the motion for default judgment because it lacked both in personam and in rem jurisdiction over the defendant, and the claims for declaratory relief and anti-suit injunction were not ripe or appropriate.
-
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for an injunction pending appeal, finding they were unlikely to succeed on the merits and would not suffer irreparable harm.
-
The court recommended granting the Receiver's fifth application for payment of fees for services rendered.
-
The court entered a Stipulated Final Permanent Injunction Order, resolving all disputes between Wyndham and the Defendants. The injunction permanently restrains and enjoins the Defendants from engaging in various advertising, marketing, and trade practices related to timeshare in
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2020-10-21
The Florida Supreme Court discharged a writ of certiorari, finding it improvidently issued, as there was no conflict between appellate decisions concerning the zoning of Mayflower Property's land.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2020-10-21
A condominium association is entitled to a mandatory injunction to access a unit owner's balcony for restoration work, but the circuit court erred in failing to require a bond under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b) as a condition of the injunction.
-
The court held that Casino was not entitled to attorney's fees under either federal or state law because it was not the prevailing party, as the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case after achieving the injunctive relief it sought.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for an injunction and struck her complaint.
-
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from manufacturing, selling, or distributing infringing products and from concealing assets.
-
The court found that the Secretary of State's failure to maintain a functional voter registration website and her subsequent limited deadline extension, with insufficient notice, likely violated constitutional rights. The court also determined that the organizational plaintiffs h
-
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, finding they met the requirements for such relief.
-
The court granted plaintiffs' ex parte application for a temporary restraining order due to their strong likelihood of success on the merits and the irreparable harm they would suffer from defendants' alleged trademark infringement.
-
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish irreparable harm, both due to their significant delay in seeking injunctive relief and their lack of corroborating evidence for claimed injuries.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, granting default judgment against certain defendants and ordering disgorgement and permanent injunctions related to tax return preparation.