-
294 F.2d 834·
5th Cir.·
1961-09-01
·cited 18×
The court held that the district court should have recognized the Florida state court's anti-suit injunction on grounds of comity, and dismissed the federal action on that basis rather than reaching the merits of res judicata.
-
690 F. Supp. 2d 1317·
S.D. Fla.·
2010-02-17
·cited 14×
The court held that personal jurisdiction over the defendants exists under Florida's long-arm statute for tortious acts committed outside the state that caused injury within Florida, and for contractual actions that submitted to Florida jurisdiction.
-
837 F.2d 33·
2d Cir.·
1987-12-31
·cited 13×
The court held that the district court abused its discretion by issuing an anti-suit injunction against foreign litigation, as the Korean action posed no threat to the district court's jurisdiction or important public policies of the forum.
-
713 F.2d 875·
1st Cir.·
1983-08-03
·cited 12×
An order staying state court proceedings after removal is not an appealable interlocutory injunction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) because removal automatically effects a stay and the order is merely declaratory of existing law.
-
890 F.2d 1205·
D.C. Cir.·
1989-12-01
·cited 11×
The court held that the district court erred in granting a preliminary injunction against Stena's tender offer, as it lacked a legal basis, and that Stena failed to demonstrate sufficient irreparable harm to warrant a preliminary injunction requiring further disclosures under the
-
613 F. Supp. 2d 1362·
S.D. Fla.·
2009-05-12
·cited 10×
The court held that confirmation of the arbitration award for damages under the Loan Agreement is denied because the Loan Agreement did not contain an arbitration clause and was a separate agreement from the Hotel Management Agreement. The award is confirmed in all other respects
-
613 F. Supp. 2d 1341·
S.D. Fla.·
2009-04-24
·cited 2×
The court granted the receiver's motion for an anti-suit injunction, enjoining the defendant from proceeding with foreign civil litigation that interferes with the receivership proceedings and the court's jurisdiction.
-
314 So. 3d 295·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-06-03
·cited 1×
The appellate court reversed a judgment finding Diageo liable for breaching the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, holding that the breach of contract claim was barred by the contract's express termination provisions and exclusion of implied warranties. The court af
-
696 F. Supp. 2d 1282·
S.D. Fla.·
2010-03-22
·cited 1×
A motion for reconsideration is denied when the movant fails to show clear error or manifest injustice, and the arguments presented were previously considered. The scope of an arbitration agreement is determined by U.S. federal law, focusing on the factual allegations of the comp
-
956 F.2d 1349·
6th Cir.·
1992-02-24
·cited 1×
The court affirmed the district court's decision to grant an injunction, finding that the Laker Airways test properly balanced international comity with the integrity of U.S. laws and jurisdiction.
-
Del. Ch.·
2025-05-21
The Delaware Court of Chancery denied summary judgment on claims for specific performance and injunctive relief, finding that the plaintiff had adequate remedies at law. The court also declined to rule on the declaratory judgment claim, electing instead to stay the remaining issu
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2025-01-02
An anti-suit injunction is properly issued against a party who initiates litigation in violation of an executed forum selection clause designating Miami-Dade County, Florida as the exclusive venue for disputes.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2023-03-24
The Superior Court properly denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's declaratory judgment claim, finding that the law of the case doctrine dictated that Delaware was the proper forum. However, the Court of Chancery lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the plain
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-07-22
The court held that an anti-suit injunction is appropriate to prevent a party from pursuing litigation in a foreign forum when they have agreed to arbitrate the dispute, and that the claims are subject to arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act.
-
Del. Ch.·
2021-08-17
The court granted in part the motion for an anti-suit injunction, enjoining the defendants from pursuing certain claims in Texas state court that fall within the scope of a Delaware forum selection provision. The court held that the forum selection provision in the stock purchase
-
Del. Ch.·
2021-03-23
The Court granted SPay's motion for a preliminary anti-suit injunction, finding that the forum selection clause in the asset purchase agreement (APA) was enforceable and required both the fraudulent inducement claim and the declaratory judgment claim regarding the Restrictive Cov
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-10-29
The court denied the motion for default judgment because it lacked both in personam and in rem jurisdiction over the defendant, and the claims for declaratory relief and anti-suit injunction were not ripe or appropriate.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-06-04
The court denied the motion for default judgment because the plaintiffs failed to establish a sufficient basis for personal jurisdiction over the defendant.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-06-03
The appellate court reversed a jury's finding that Diageo breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, holding that the breach of contract claim was barred by the express terms of the agreement. The court affirmed the denial of a new trial on fraud and punitive d
-
Del. Ch.·
2020-03-27
The Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction in large part, finding they failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits regarding the non-compete, non-solicitation, and business opportunity provisions. The Court granted limited injunctive relief c
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-03-18
The court held that the insurance policy's Disputes Clause clearly delegates threshold arbitrability issues to the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC), and therefore, the insurer's motion to compel arbitration is granted.
-
Del. Ch.·
2019-03-26
The Court of Chancery lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Takeda's claims for declaratory relief and an anti-suit injunction because Takeda has an adequate remedy at law by asserting its purported license as a defense in the ongoing European patent infringement litigation. The
-
209 So. 3d 67·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2016-12-21
The court held that the trial court did not err in granting a temporary injunction and imposing specific terms, as the parties' unambiguous Resale Agreement contained an exclusive forum selection clause that the appellant violated by filing suit in the Dominican Republic.
-
Del. Ch.·
2016-07-07
The Delaware Court of Chancery denied the Bank's motion to lift the anti-suit injunction, holding that allowing the Bank to litigate its third-party claims against Freestone in the South Carolina Action would contravene the policies of the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act, interf
-
Del. Ch.·
2013-12-20
The Delaware Court of Chancery denied the insurer's request for a permanent injunction to prevent the insured from prosecuting claims in West Virginia. The court found that such an injunction would be ineffective to prevent the risk of inconsistent judgments because West Virginia
-
Del.·
2013-05-29
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery's denial of the defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment and anti-suit injunction. The court held that the forum selection clause was valid and enforceable, and that the defendant's arguments regarding lack of perso
-
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52313·
S.D. Fla.·
2007-07-19
The court held that the forum selection clause is valid and enforceable, and granted an anti-suit injunction, but found the choice of law clause not applicable to all substantive claims.
-
453 F. Supp. 2d 1357·
S.D. Fla.·
2006-09-27
The court granted the preliminary injunction, enjoining Lantech from proceeding in Costa Rica until the validity of the forum selection clause is determined.