5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2020-02-14
The appellate court reversed a final judgment of injunction for protection against repeat violence. The court found that the evidence presented did not meet the statutory definition of "violence" required for such an injunction, either concerning the child or the father.
-
The court denied Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because Plaintiff failed to meet the stringent requirements for ex parte relief and lacked proper notice to the adverse party.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting in part Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court granted summary judgment for the United States, issuing a permanent injunction against Roland V. Askins III to compel compliance with employment tax obligations due to his history of non-compliance.
-
The appellate court reversed a Department of Health order that approved a hospital's application to become a Level II trauma center. The court found that the Department erred by applying an outdated statute, as intervening amendments to the law required the application to be deni
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, granting in part and denying in part the plaintiff's motion for default judgment and permanent injunction.
-
The court held that disputed issues of material fact prevent summary judgment on patent validity, infringement, and inequitable conduct, and denied a motion to dissolve a preliminary injunction.
-
Del. Ch.·
2020-01-23
The court granted in part and denied in part the motion for judgment on the pleadings. The court granted judgment on Count VII, finding it to be a claim for wages subject to a one-year statute of limitations. The court denied the motion as to Count III, finding that the implied c
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2020-01-15
The appellate court reversed a lower court's decision, finding that a medical records company's practice of overcharging for patient records when requested by legal representatives violated Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA). The court held this practice
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief was denied and the case was dismissed without prejudice because he failed to comply with local rules and did not file a proper complaint.
-
The court held that while the preliminary injunction against using the term 'Primo' remains, the prohibition against using the Chinese term 'pu rui mo' in China must be dissolved due to comity and sovereignty concerns related to ongoing Chinese litigation recognizing another enti
-
The court held that the complaint must be dismissed without prejudice because it constitutes an improper shotgun pleading.
-
The court granted Gulf's motion for judgment on the pleadings regarding Eni's negligent misrepresentation claim in the second arbitration, finding it to be an impermissible collateral attack on the prior arbitration award. However, the court denied Gulf's motion concerning Eni's
-
The court granted the United States' Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction, enjoining defendants from violating Internal Revenue employment tax reporting and payment requirements.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2019-12-11
The court reversed an injunction for protection against repeat violence issued by the trial court, finding that the petitioner failed to present competent, substantial evidence of two separate acts of violence as required by Florida statute. The case arose from a dispute between
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary injunction because it failed to comply with procedural rules and lacked federal subject matter jurisdiction.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because it was procedurally insufficient and lacked a showing of irreparable harm. The court deferred ruling on the preliminary injunction.
-
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order due to procedural deficiencies and failure to meet the standard for ex parte relief, deferring ruling on the preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that the arbitration provision in the enrollment agreement was not unconscionable and granted the motion to compel arbitration.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for his First and Fourteenth Amendment claims, thus denying his motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the prerequisites for injunctive relief and denied the motion.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet its burden of persuasion for a preliminary injunction because it did not provide sufficient evidence that the restrictive covenants were reasonably necessary to protect its legitimate business interests.
-
The court held that ActivEngage failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable injury, thus denying its motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
The Court held that the sellers did not breach the Asset Purchase Agreement (APA) because the buyers failed to negotiate for explicit contractual protections regarding the opportunity to re-bid on expiring parts. The court found that the APA's representations and warranties did n
-
The court held that the plaintiff, as a disinterested stakeholder, had a reasonable fear of vexatious litigation due to conflicting claims on an escrow fund, thus satisfying the requirements for statutory interpleader.
-
The court held that a motion for injunctive relief must seek relief related to claims in the operative complaint and must comply with local rules regarding supporting evidence.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, entering default judgment, a permanent injunction, and awarding statutory damages and attorney's fees.
-
Florida voters amended the state constitution in 2018 to automatically restore voting rights to most felons "upon completion of all terms of sentence including parole or probation," but the Florida Legislature enacted a statute implementing this amendment to require payment of fi
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding they failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits regarding trade dress distinctiveness, non-functionality, and likelihood of confusion.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant default judgment, award damages, and issue a permanent injunction for trademark infringement.
-
The court held that while 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c) mandates detention, prolonged detention without a bond hearing can violate the Due Process Clause.
-
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining Defendants from manufacturing, selling, or distributing counterfeit goods bearing Plaintiff's trademarks and from transferring assets.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant in part and deny in part the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, entering a permanent injunction and monetary judgment against Allied Markets, LLC.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-10-04
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dismissing the plaintiff with prejudice and discharging it from liability, entering default judgment against one defendant, and entering final judgment for the other defendant.
-
The court denied NCH's motion for a preliminary injunction because it sought relief beyond the scope of preliminary injunctions and failed to demonstrate actual and imminent irreparable harm.
-
The court held that the plaintiffs lacked Article III standing because they failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of future injury and failed to show redressability.
-
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to meet their burden to prove that the SNAP violations did not occur or that the sanction imposed was arbitrary and capricious, thus denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
A trial court does not abuse its discretion in denying a temporary injunction when the moving party fails to establish a clear legal right to relief and irreparable harm, and when adequate remedies at law exist for quantifiable damages such as lost rental income.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's application for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, a favorable balance of harms, and that the injunction serves the public interest.
-
The court denied reconsideration of its prior order regarding costs and fees, finding no extraordinary circumstances or clear error to justify reopening the judgment.
-
A domestic violence injunction must be corrected when it improperly extends protection to both the appellee and his child rather than limiting protection to the child alone.
-
The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation to enter default judgment and a permanent injunction against MAR LLC, but modified the injunction to be more specific.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction as moot.
-
The court denied the motion for preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, as the contracts did not unambiguously assign the defendants' rights of publicity.
-
A trial court does not abuse its discretion in awarding all marital assets to the former wife and freezing the former husband's entire stock ownership plan as security for meaningful financial relief when the former husband is an unemployed domestic abuser who subsequently commit
-
The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for reconsideration because it amounted to a disagreement with the court's prior reasoning and rehashed arguments already considered.
-
The court held that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review the petitioner's claims challenging the execution of her final removal order.
-
The appellate court affirmed a trial court's decision granting domestic violence injunctions. The appellant argued he was not properly notified of the final hearing, but the court found he was properly served by mail and also had actual knowledge of the proceedings.
-
This case concerns whether a party moving out of the country was properly notified of a domestic violence injunction hearing. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding that notice was properly served by mail and that the appellant also had actual knowledge
-
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining the defendants from distributing copyrighted works and using infringing trademarks.