5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court denied the petitioner's motion for an arrest warrant and directed him to file an amended petition clarifying jurisdiction and causes of action.
-
The court held that a temporary restraining order should issue, but required the plaintiff to post a bond to protect the defendant from potential damages.
-
The court held that sanctions were not warranted against the plaintiff for filing an amended complaint or an emergency motion, as these actions were not objectively frivolous or presented for an improper purpose at this stage.
-
Del.·
2023-01-06
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery's judgment, holding that the irrevocable proxy did not run with the Majority Shares. The court found that Delaware law requires irrevocable proxies to clearly and unambiguously state that they will continue with the shares
-
The court adopted in part the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting a permanent injunction, a five-year penny stock bar, and ordering disgorgement, while modifying the scope of the injunction.
-
A Florida circuit court has subject matter jurisdiction to hear a petition for injunction for protection against domestic violence when the petitioner is a Florida resident, regardless of where the alleged domestic violence occurred.
-
54 F.4th 702·
11th Cir.·
2022-12-01
The district court lacked jurisdiction to enjoin the government from using lawfully seized records in a criminal investigation or to appoint a special master.
-
-
The Court affirmed the conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon but reversed and remanded for the board of review to clarify the evidentiary standard it applied in evaluating the evidence, as the opinion created ambiguity about whether the board used the proper standard of
-
The Court of Chancery dismissed the plaintiffs' case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that they failed to establish a reasonable apprehension of future harm that would necessitate equitable relief. While the plaintiffs sought a permanent injunction, their claims f
-
The court granted an ex parte temporary restraining order because the petitioner demonstrated a likelihood of success on his Hague Convention claim, irreparable injury, a favorable balance of harms, and that the relief sought would not be adverse to the public interest.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motions for clerk's default, permanent injunction, and summary judgment, and granted the plaintiff's motion to remove the demand for jury trial and monetary damages. The court granted in part and denied in part the defendant's motion to dismiss, d
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2022-11-14
An injunction is affirmed when competent substantial evidence supports it in the record, even if the evidence is in sharp contrast, because credibility determinations are within the trial court's exclusive purview.
-
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order because it was procedurally deficient and lacked sufficient urgency, but reserved ruling on the preliminary injunction.
-
The court denied the plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because they failed to meet the procedural requirements for such relief.
-
The court denied the defendants' motion for a stay pending appeal because they failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm, and the balance of equities weighed against a stay.
-
The court held that the inmate's filing was insufficient for injunctive relief and did not properly initiate a civil rights action.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order because he failed to meet the required legal standards and procedural requirements.
-
-
The Federal Trade Commission sued American Vehicle Protection Corp. for deceptively marketing and selling extended automobile warranties through telemarketers who misrepresented affiliations with car dealerships and made false promises about coverage and refund policies. The cour
-
The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because it was procedurally and substantively deficient.
-
The court granted the SEC's motion, ordering disgorgement of $277,806, prejudgment interest of $43,365, and a $50,000 civil penalty against the defendant for securities violations.
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2022-10-21
A commercial tenant (SHI) sued its condominium association (Association) for placing a dumpster structure that eliminated six parking spots in a common area. The appellate court held that the Association violated its own governing documents by obstructing the parking facilities a
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2022-10-14
-
The court held that a motion for an emergency temporary restraining order (TRO) must be denied when it fails to meet the strict requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b), including showing immediate and irreparable injury, providing a sworn affidavit, giving proper no
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding it appropriate based on the parties' stipulation and the likelihood of success on the merits of trademark infringement claims.
-
The court denied the motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order because the plaintiffs failed to meet the stringent requirements for such relief. The court deferred ruling on the preliminary injunction pending the defendants' response.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-09-24
The court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding injunctive relief and reduced attorney's fees and costs.
-
The court held that the complaint was a shotgun pleading warranting dismissal, and specific counts were dismissed with prejudice due to failure to state a claim, while the request for a preliminary injunction was denied.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-09-15
The district court denied the government's motion for a partial stay pending appeal of an order appointing a special master and enjoining certain uses of seized materials.
-
The court held that plaintiff is not a prevailing party for purposes of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 because the relief obtained was provisional and has not resulted in an enduring change in the legal relationship between the parties, as the case has not been definitive
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-09-05
Former President Trump sought judicial oversight and the appointment of a special master to review documents and personal items seized from his residence in an FBI search on August 8, 2022, citing concerns about privilege protections and the return of personal property. The court
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-09-02
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting default judgment on all counts, awarding statutory damages and costs, and permanently enjoining defendants from infringing plaintiff's trademarks.
-
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2022-08-24
A temporary injunction restricting speech based on tortious interference with business relationships may be upheld when the prerequisites are met and the limited exception to prior restraint applies, but the trial court must make explicit findings on the public interest element,
-
The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant the motion for default judgment, finding no clear error on the face of the record.
-
The court denied the motion to dismiss the defendant's counterclaims for fraud, permanent injunction, and declaratory relief.
-
The court granted default judgment against the defendants and entered a permanent injunction prohibiting the use of the plaintiffs' KOMATSU marks.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-08-11
The court granted Primerica's motions, allowing it to interplead the insurance benefit, deduct attorney's fees and costs, and be discharged from liability, while entering default judgment against Xavier Johnson.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-08-10
The court granted the petitioners' motion for reconsideration, approving their Letter of Undertaking and directing the Clerk to issue a monition and injunction, allowing them to proceed with their limitation of liability action.
-
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, granting the franchisor's motion for preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that neither party breached the agreement governing the sale of the entity that owned the apartments, and the Holtzman Parties failed to establish damages. The court also found that the Holtzman Parties lacked standing to assert other claims and failed to establish
-
Del. Ch.·
2022-08-01
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, requiring the defendants to continue providing services under the Transition Services Agreement (TSA). This relief was conditioned upon the plaintiffs posting a $2.8 million monthly surety bond. The court foun
-
Bradley Hester, on behalf of a class of indigent pretrial detainees, challenged Cullman County's bail system as unconstitutionally discriminating against the poor and denying due process, and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part. The court h
-
The court held that the Sheriff's office's alleged failure to arrest a domestic violence perpetrator did not violate the Due Process Clause and that no special duty existed under Florida law to support a negligence claim.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to enter default judgment against the defendant, modifying the resolution regarding certain counts.
-
The court held that an anti-suit injunction is appropriate to prevent a party from pursuing litigation in a foreign forum when they have agreed to arbitrate the dispute, and that the claims are subject to arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim for denial of access to courts or violation of privacy, and thus failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits for injunctive relief.
-
The Court denied the Plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, as well as her request to amend the complaint.