5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court held that a preliminary injunction is unwarranted because the plaintiff failed to establish irreparable harm, as the remedies sought relate to collecting a money judgment and adequate legal remedies exist.
-
An inmate incarcerated in Florida sought damages against a prison physician under the Eighth Amendment for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, claiming the physician failed to reissue specialist-prescribed medical passes following shoulder surgery, refused to pursue
-
The Court held that the City of Seaford's ordinance mandating cremation or interment of all fetal remains was preempted by state law and therefore invalid. Delaware law establishes a specific scheme for the disposal of human remains, requiring an official record of death for crem
-
Plaintiffs have not met their burden to establish standing to pursue preliminary injunctive relief, except potentially for one plaintiff whose motion is reserved.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-24
The court denied the petitioners' motion for an order approving a letter of undertaking, issuance of monition and injunction, and directing the clerk to issue notice to claimants.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief and ordered him to file an amended complaint because the original complaint was a "shotgun pleading" that failed to state claims with sufficient specificity.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief because he failed to meet the required legal standards for such relief.
-
The appellate court reversed a domestic violence injunction, finding the evidence insufficient to establish an objectively reasonable fear of imminent danger. The court emphasized that while the wife experienced verbal abuse and property damage, the husband never physically harme
-
The Court held that the Omnibus Agreement constituted an 'Asset Transfer' under Stream's charter, requiring a majority vote of Class B stockholders. Therefore, the Resolution Committee lacked the authority to approve the agreement without such a vote. The Court also clarified tha
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because it failed to meet the required procedural and substantive elements.
-
Luxury goods manufacturers Richemont International SA and related companies sued multiple individuals and entities operating online e-commerce stores on Amazon, DHgate, eBay, and Wish for selling counterfeit versions of their trademarked watches, jewelry, and accessories includin
-
A local government must follow its own procedural requirements for comprehensive plan amendments even though state law treats such amendments as legislative decisions subject to the fairly debatable standard of review.
-
-
The appellate court affirmed a trial court's contempt order and permanent injunction, clarifying that an easement for ingress and egress does not permit parking or stopping. The court also addressed jurisdictional issues regarding the review of pre-judgment contempt orders, certi
-
The court granted in part and denied in part the petitioner's motion for a temporary restraining order, prohibiting the child's removal from the jurisdiction and scheduling an expedited hearing.
-
The court held that the plaintiff lacked standing to seek a preliminary injunction because he failed to establish a redressable injury or a credible threat of enforcement of the UCCJEA judgment.
-
The Court will fashion a permanent injunction itself after the parties failed to agree on its terms.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-05-25
Unit owners challenged a special assessment levied by Star Lakes Association to fund reconstruction of Building 12 after a fire, arguing the assessment was invalid because it should have been limited to Building 12 residents or required a community-wide vote. The trial court init
-
Military servicemembers challenged a Department of Defense COVID-19 vaccine mandate on the grounds that it violated their religious freedom rights and other constitutional protections, seeking preliminary injunctive relief to prevent enforcement while the case proceeded. The cour
-
The court held that there are genuine issues of material fact regarding the enforceability of restrictive covenants and the alleged breach, thus denying summary judgment on these claims.
-
The court denied the defendant's motion to set aside a default judgment and injunction, and granted the plaintiff's motion to enforce the injunction and hold the defendant in contempt.
-
The Delaware Court of Chancery found that James Harron breached his fiduciary duty of loyalty to Metro International and Metro LATAM by engaging in extensive outside consulting work, failing to disclose it, usurping a financing opportunity, and misusing confidential information.
-
Fareda Sands appealed a trial court's grant of a temporary injunction preventing her from violating a non-disclosure, non-solicitation, and non-competition agreement with her former employer. The court affirmed the issuance of the injunction but reversed and remanded regarding th
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-05-04
Nerja I. Jakubow appeals from an order requiring him to post a $425,000 cash bond to maintain a lis pendens on property, arguing he was entitled to the lis pendens without bonding because the underlying action was based on a duly recorded instrument. The Third District Court of A
-
The court held that the inmate's request for injunctive relief was denied due to failure to meet the prerequisites, including irreparable harm and procedural compliance.
-
The court held that while default judgment is warranted, a permanent injunction against third-party online platforms to remove listings is beyond the court's power, but an injunction requiring platforms in privity (as bailees) to cease fulfillment and surrender infringing goods i
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because he failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm.
-
The court held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's pro se filing and dismissed the action without prejudice.
-
The court entered a permanent injunction against the defendants and directed entry of final judgment for the plaintiff, denying the defendants' motion to stay proceedings pending appeal.
-
Ricky Patterson appeals his conviction for violating a domestic violence protection injunction, challenging the trial court's admission of testimony about phone calls and voicemails from the victim without proper authentication. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, holdin
-
This case concerns whether a property owners association was entitled to attorney's fees after voluntarily dismissing a lawsuit seeking a mandatory injunction. The appellate court found the association was not the prevailing party because the lawsuit should have been dismissed ea
-
The court held that the plaintiff's allegations of imminent danger were too vague to proceed in forma pauperis, and thus denied his motions.
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2022-04-08
The appellate court reviewed a nonfinal order granting a temporary injunction. While the trial court had a basis for the injunction, it erred by failing to require the movant to post a bond as mandated by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b).
-
Del. Ch.·
2022-04-04
The Delaware Court of Chancery held that an irrevocable proxy does not run with the shares unless the language of the proxy itself plainly indicates that it is intended to bind subsequent owners. The court found that the specific language of the irrevocable proxy at issue, when s
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the burden of persuasion for the four prerequisites of injunctive relief.
-
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, finding sufficient allegations for copyright infringement, DMCA violations, and trademark infringement against the LiquidVPN Defendants.
-
The court granted defendants' motion to hold plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction in abeyance pending resolution of a motion to stay and a parallel Texas proceeding.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-03-24
Andrew Brown, a pre-trial detainee at the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office facility, sued Chaplain W. Thomas under § 1983 and RLUIPA alleging that Thomas violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights by denying his religious accommodation requests for a vegan diet and special P
-
The court held that it cannot compel the IRS to disburse Economic Income Payments (EIPs) under the CARES Act, as such determinations are the responsibility of the IRS, not the court.
-
Arthrex sued its former employee Hilton and competitor Paragon after Hilton left Arthrex to work for Paragon, claiming he had misappropriated trade secrets and violated non-compete restrictions. The court found it had personal jurisdiction over Hilton based on his breach of the c
-
The court granted the motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiffs have a strong likelihood of success on the merits and are likely to suffer irreparable injury due to the defendants' sale of counterfeit and infringing goods.
-
The appellate court reversed a domestic violence injunction, finding the petitioner lacked statutory standing because she did not demonstrate she had resided with the respondent. The court also reversed the denial of the respondent's motion to vacate the injunction based on new e
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2022-03-02
The appellate court reversed a domestic violence injunction, finding the petitioner lacked statutory standing because she did not prove she resided with the respondent. The court also reversed the denial of the respondent's motion to vacate the injunction based on new evidence.
-
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits regarding the vaccine mandate.
-
The court held that the Estate's motion for a new trial based on alleged violations of an order excluding sibling relationship evidence was denied.
-
The Court of Chancery granted the District's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that the Owner's claims for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief did not establish equitable jurisdiction. The court determined that issues of statutory interpret
-
The court held that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm, thus denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court denied plaintiffs' motion for enhanced damages, finding that the case did not warrant such an award despite a finding of willful infringement.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-02-16
LK Hotel LLC appeals a trial court order granting partial summary judgment on counts seeking declaratory relief and injunctive relief regarding allegedly unlawful hotel condominium charges. The appellate court dismisses the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, finding the order is no
-
The court held that the plaintiff inmate's filing was insufficient to warrant injunctive relief and dismissed the case without prejudice.