-
304 F.2d 583·
5th Cir.·
1962-06-01
·cited 105×
The court held that the Civil Rights Act of 1957, as amended, empowers federal district courts to issue mandatory injunctions ordering the registration of voters found to have been discriminatorily denied registration due to race.
-
468 F.2d 389·
7th Cir.·
1972-10-06
·cited 79×
The dissenting judge holds that federal courts lack the power to issue mandatory injunctions regulating the discretion of state court judges and prosecutors, and that state officials are immune from damage claims for acts within their official duties.
-
89 Fla. 253·
Fla.·
1925-03-16
·cited 63×
This case concerns a mandatory injunction granted to compel a landowner to remove fences obstructing a road. The appellate court affirmed the injunction, finding sufficient evidence of a prescriptive easement and irreparable harm to the complainant.
-
478 F.2d 418·
5th Cir.·
1973-05-15
·cited 44×
The court held that while the district court had jurisdiction and the power to issue a mandatory injunction, the mandatory injunction requiring restoration must be vacated to allow the administrative process for an after-the-fact permit to be completed.
-
296 F.2d 690·
5th Cir.·
1961-11-30
·cited 43×
Nonresident aliens absent from the country are entitled to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act for agency actions that aggrieve them, and the subordinate official with authority to act is an indispensable party.
-
515 F.2d 1185·
5th Cir.·
1975-07-16
·cited 35×
The court held that the district court did not err in finding reasonable cause to believe unfair labor practices occurred and in granting prohibitory injunctive relief while denying mandatory relief, as § 10(j) relief is extraordinary and should not usurp the Board's primary func
-
141 So. 2d 761·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1962-06-05
·cited 28×
Plaintiffs appealed the denial of an injunction against Escambia County and Southern Bell to prevent use of a public road crossing their property. The court affirmed, holding that Florida Statute § 337.31 creates a conclusive presumption of dedication to the public when a county
-
721 So. 2d 735·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1998-07-27
·cited 24×
The court reversed an injunctive order issued by the trial court that imposed requirements on the appellants regarding use of disputed property by a church, finding the injunction was legally insufficient because it was entered sua sponte without a proper request, contained manda
-
685 So. 2d 904·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1996-12-11
·cited 18×
The court reversed a decision regarding a landlord's potential entitlement to a mandatory injunction for specific performance of a continuous operations clause, and addressed the landlord's right to liquidated damages in lieu of percentage rent.
-
729 F.2d 589·
8th Cir.·
1984-03-19
·cited 18×
The court affirmed the district court's preliminary injunction ordering the defendant to deliver seed corn, finding no abuse of discretion in granting the injunction.
-
513 F.2d 546·
5th Cir.·
1975-05-22
·cited 12×
A provision for attorney's fees in a promissory note cannot be enforced in a Chapter X reorganization proceeding if the preconditions for validity of the lien for such fees were not met until after the petition was filed and in the face of a prohibitory injunction.
-
860 F.2d 529·
2d Cir.·
1988-10-25
·cited 8×
The court held that allegations of a coordinated scheme to suppress dissent and monopolize communication within a union, even if involving officers, can establish federal jurisdiction under the LMRDA, justifying pendent jurisdiction over related state law claims. The case was not
-
849 F.2d 80·
2d Cir.·
1988-06-13
·cited 6×
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction requiring the provision of mental health services, finding a likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
143 So. 2d 69·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1962-06-27
·cited 6×
The City of Miami appealed a trial court decree ordering it to issue municipal licenses to Cuban Village, Inc. The appellate court granted a writ to preserve the status quo, holding that an automatic stay of the decree on appeal stays only its mandatory provisions (requiring lice
-
333 So. 3d 289·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-01-19
·cited 4×
This case involves a dispute over ownership interests in foreign corporations, with allegations of fraudulent divestment and conspiracy. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's denial of motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and forum non conveniens, finding
-
299 So. 3d 481·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-02-26
·cited 4×
The appellate court affirmed a trial court's order for a mandatory injunction. The injunction required appellants to return $19.5 million to an escrow account and prohibited further transfers, pending a determination of the appellee's ownership interest in the funds.
-
286 F.2d 875·
7th Cir.·
1961-02-17
·cited 4×
The court held that the prohibitory injunction should be amended to limit its scope to the area of actual deposits and affirmed as amended, but reversed the mandatory injunction due to erroneous determination of defendants' several responsibilities.
-
90 Fla. 123·
Fla.·
1925-07-08
·cited 4×
This case involves an appeal from two interlocutory orders granting temporary injunctions without proper notice or sufficient factual basis in the bills filed. The appellate court found the bills insufficient to support the injunctions.
-
123 So. 2d 473·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1960-10-06
·cited 2×
The State Road Department appealed a dismissal of its complaint seeking mandatory injunction to remove encroaching property improvements from a public highway right of way. The court held that the complaint, despite being poorly pleaded, sufficiently alleged a cause of action for
-
Fla. 6th DCA·
2026-04-02
Riparian-rights disputes involving sovereign submerged land underlying a navigable lake are governed by the test of whether one riparian owner's use unreasonably interferes with another's riparian rights, not the equitable distribution test from Hayes v. Bowman, which applies onl
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-25
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits due to an impermissible mandatory injunction request and failed to show imminent irreparable injury due to significant, unexplained delays.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-12-10
The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice, finding that abstention under Younger v. Harris was required due to a pending state proceeding and that the plaintiff failed to state a claim under federal law.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-12-12
Ball & Chain LLC and Taquerias, restaurants in Miami's Little Havana neighborhood, sued the City of Miami under Section 1983 alleging that City Commissioner Joe Carollo orchestrated a pattern of harassment through inspections, ordinances, and code enforcement actions motivated by
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-05-24
Military servicemembers challenged a Department of Defense COVID-19 vaccine mandate on the grounds that it violated their religious freedom rights and other constitutional protections, seeking preliminary injunctive relief to prevent enforcement while the case proceeded. The cour
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2021-03-05
A mandatory injunction requiring immediate remediation of contamination must be reversed where it fails to describe with reasonable detail the acts required and was issued after an abbreviated hearing without full opportunity for parties to present evidence.
-
211 So. 2d 230·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1968-06-05
Steed, a lessee in a cooperative apartment building, sued to enjoin other lessees from constructing enclosures at the ends of a common walkway on the east side of the building, alleging the enclosures violated his lease's provisions regarding quiet enjoyment and non-obstruction o