VINCENT CLAUDE MEDINA A/K/A FRACTAL FACE, VINCENT CLAUDE MEDINA, AND VINNY MEDINA
v.
S.R.H., MOTHER OF S.M., A CHILD
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An injunction is affirmed when competent substantial evidence supports it in the record, even if the evidence is in sharp contrast, because credibility determinations are within the trial court's exclusive purview.
[1] An appellate court will not reweigh evidence or disturb a trial court's credibility determinations regarding witness testimony when reviewing whether competent substantia…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Because there is competent substantial evidence in the record to support the injunction, we affirm. While the evidence was in sharp contrast, the credibility of the witnesses is within the trial court's exclusive purview. We cannot reweigh the evidence.”
Court's rationale for affirming the injunction, citing Disston v. Hanson
Medina appealed a circuit court injunction issued in a family law matter involving S.R.H., the mother of a child. The trial court found sufficient evi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Credibility Of Witnesses cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
VINCENT CLAUDE MEDINA
A/K/A FRACTAL FACE, VINCENT CLAUDE MEDINA, AND VINNY MEDINA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D22-590 LT Case No. 2021-DR-1362
S.R.H., MOTHER OF
S.M., A CHILD, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed November 14, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Charles Helm, Judge. Linda Bellomio Commons, of Linda Bellomio Commons, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
2 AFFIRMED. See Disston v. Hanson, 116 So. 3d 612, 612 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (“Because there is competent substantial evidence in the record to support the injunction, we affirm. While the evidence was in sharp contrast, the credibility of the witnesses is within the trial court’s exclusive purview. We cannot reweigh the evidence.”). LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.