5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2025-06-27
A trial court errs when it concludes it has authority under Florida Family Law Rule 12.540(b) to vacate a release contained in a divorce judgment in a civil action where no motion to set aside the judgment was filed in that civil action and any such motion in the family law proce
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding statutory damages, a permanent injunction, and attorneys' fees and costs, while denying prejudgment interest.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-06-24
The court recommends dismissal of the case for improper venue and lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, and recommends enjoining the plaintiff from filing further pro se complaints without attorney attestation or filing fee payment.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's amended complaint must be dismissed and her motion for a temporary restraining order denied because the action constitutes an improper collateral attack on a state court foreclosure judgment, barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.
-
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff's significant delay in seeking relief undermined its claim of irreparable harm.
-
When parties modify a contract through a subsequent agreement on the same subject matter, the later agreement controls to the extent of any repugnancy with the earlier agreement.
-
The Court denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's amended complaint for legal malpractice. The Court found that the plaintiff had adequately pleaded that the Court of Chancery had subject matter jurisdiction over the underlying action, that Delaware had personal
-
The court held that the inmate plaintiff failed to meet the heightened burden required for a mandatory preliminary injunction to grow a longer beard.
-
The court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, warranting denial of his motion for injunctive relief.
-
The court held that judicial immunity bars claims against judges and that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over claims against the private defendant, thus denying the motion for a temporary restraining order and dismissing the complaint.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-06-10
The court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss, dismissing the procedural and substantive due process claims for failure to allege a protected liberty or property interest.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-06-10
This is a District Court order entering default judgment against all potential claimants who failed to file claims by the July 15, 2024 deadline. The opinion also includes procedural guidance on appellate jurisdiction and notice of appeal requirements under 28 U.S.C. Section 1291
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-06-09
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances to proceed anonymously, as his privacy interests did not outweigh the presumption of open judicial proceedings.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that the student failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for his First Amendment claims regarding graduation attire.
-
The court granted default judgment for patent and trademark infringement, finding the defendant's admitted actions constituted infringement and that a permanent injunction was warranted.
-
The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis for liability and entitlement to injunctive relief and statutory damages.
-
The court granted the Plaintiff's motion for final default judgment, awarding statutory damages, attorneys' fees, costs, and a permanent injunction against the Defendants for copyright infringement.
-
The Delaware Court of Chancery denied summary judgment on claims for specific performance and injunctive relief, finding that the plaintiff had adequate remedies at law. The court also declined to rule on the declaratory judgment claim, electing instead to stay the remaining issu
-
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, finding sufficient grounds to freeze cryptocurrency assets in identified wallets.
-
A Chinese company with a federally registered trademark for clothing called "BAGILAANOE" sued a defendant, Chenxi Li, who was selling counterfeit products bearing that mark through a deceptive online store operated under a fraudulently used Florida business name. The court grante
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-19
The court affirmed the bankruptcy court's judgment, holding that it had subject matter jurisdiction, did not err in choice of law, and that the appellants received a fair hearing.
-
Florida's Senate Bill 1438 criminalized knowingly admitting children to "adult live performances," including those depicting "lewd conduct," but the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held the law was likely unconstitutional on its face because the vague definition of "lewd conduc
-
The court held that the termination of the plaintiff's SEVIS status was likely arbitrary and capricious, violating the APA and Due Process Clause, and granted a preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction was denied, and the complaint was dismissed.
-
The court recommended granting a preliminary injunction against defendants for trademark infringement and counterfeiting, finding a likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-12
Novo Nordisk sued Brooksville Pharmaceuticals under Florida's unfair trade practices law to prevent the pharmacy from compounding and selling semaglutide injections, claiming the products were adulterated and misbranded drugs that harmed consumers and cost Novo Nordisk sales. The
-
A temporary injunction must be reversed when the moving party fails to establish all four required elements—likelihood of irreparable harm, lack of adequate remedy at law, substantial likelihood of success on the merits, and consideration of the public interest—by competent subst
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order failed due to procedural deficiencies and substantive defects in the complaint and motion.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining the defendant from using the plaintiff's trademarks on counterfeit goods and restraining the defendant's assets.
-
The court granted the motion to convert the temporary restraining order into a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiff established a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, a favorable balance of harms, and that the injunction would serve t
-
The court granted the application for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiffs satisfied the requirements for its issuance.
-
The Court reversed the Court of Chancery's order granting dismissal, holding that the final sentence of Section 9.3.2(a) of the Merger Agreement clearly establishes a condition precedent that can trigger a forfeiture for noncompliance with the notice requirements. However, becaus
-
DuraServ LLC obtained a default judgment against Action Garage Door Repair Corp. on a Lanham Act trademark claim, with a permanent injunction issued against the defendant. This is a default judgment in a trademark infringement case.
-
The court granted in part Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its trade secret misappropriation claims under the DTSA.
-
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiffs failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for any of their claims.
-
A plaintiff challenging DHS termination of F-1 student status in SEVIS is likely to succeed on an APA claim where the termination lacks statutory or regulatory authority under 8 C.F.R. § 214.1(d) and is arbitrary and capricious. A temporary restraining order is warranted where th
-
The court granted the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order, finding he was likely to succeed on the merits of his claims that his SEVIS record was unlawfully terminated.
-
Tissot SA, a luxury watch manufacturer, sought default judgment against defendants operating counterfeit e-commerce stores under the names rotwatches.com and salestoretoday.com that were selling goods bearing counterfeit versions of Tissot's federally registered trademarks. The c
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2025-04-16
A parent seeking a permanent injunction for protection against sexual violence on behalf of a minor child against the other parent must be an eyewitness, provide direct physical evidence, or submit eyewitness affidavits; hearsay statements from the child alone, even if admissible
-
iCore Midco Inc. and iCoreConnect Inc. sought an ex parte temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against PIGI Solutions, LLC and John Schneller to prevent a foreclosure auction sale of their personal property pursuant to a security agreement. The district court de
-
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, asset freeze, alternative service, and expedited discovery.
-
The court granted the parties' joint motion for a consent judgment and permanent injunction, finding it lawful and reasonable.
-
An injunction for protection against domestic violence is reviewed for abuse of discretion, and without a complete record of trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot conclude the trial court's judgment is unsupported by evidence.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-01
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish entitlement to preliminary injunctive relief due to procedural and substantive deficiencies in his motion.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding statutory damages, attorney's fees, costs, and a permanent injunction for copyright infringement.
-
The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation to award lost royalties but denied other damages and an asset freeze, finding them speculative or unsupported.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order was moot due to his transfer and that his motion for appointment of counsel was denied as there were no exceptional circumstances.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2025-03-26
Flora Ines Perdomo appeals a nonfinal order granting an amended preliminary injunction in an estate matter. The Third District Court of Appeal reversed because the trial court failed to follow mandatory procedural requirements for issuing a preliminary injunction, including the f
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits due to an impermissible mandatory injunction request and failed to show imminent irreparable injury due to significant, unexplained delays.