5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because it was not supported by evidence and the plaintiff had not served the defendants.
-
The court held that a plaintiff is entitled to default judgment for copyright infringement when defendants fail to appear or respond, and that statutory damages and injunctive relief are appropriate.
-
The court recommended granting plaintiff's motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis for subject-matter and personal jurisdiction, and well-pleaded allegations supporting liability for trademark infringement, counterfeiting, and unfair competition.
-
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for injunctive relief because they failed to establish the necessary requirements for such an order.
-
Fares sought a domestic violence injunction against Blake based on emails he sent to her orthodontics residency classmates describing his version of events in their pending divorce. The trial court issued a two-year injunction finding Blake committed harassment, but the appellate
-
The court granted in part the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable injury if the vessel is transferred or moved.
-
Rule 12.407(a), which requires a prior court order before a minor child may attend a family law proceeding, was promulgated to protect minor children from unnecessary involvement in family law proceedings and does not expand the due process rights of a respondent parent defending
-
Rule 12.407(a), which requires a prior court order before a minor child may attend family law proceedings, was promulgated to protect minor children from harm by unnecessary involvement and does not expand the due process rights of a respondent parent in a domestic violence injun
-
A temporary injunction order is legally insufficient and must be reversed and remanded when it fails to contain clear and sufficient factual findings supporting each of the four required elements and fails to require a bond, as mandated by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b)
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's application for a preliminary injunction due to strong evidence of trademark infringement and counterfeiting by the non-responding defendants.
-
The court granted the parties' joint motion for a stipulated permanent injunction, resolving the injunctive relief sought by the plaintiff.
-
The court denied Project44's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that while Project44 was likely to succeed on its breach of contract claims, it failed to demonstrate a likelihood of irreparable harm. The alleged harm, primarily lost revenue from a single customer accoun
-
Lakasia Portee-Jones appeals a contempt order imposing a 40-day jail sentence for violating a domestic violence protection injunction. The court reversed the jail sentence, finding the trial court failed to comply with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840's procedural require
-
The court held that a plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction or writ of mandamus must establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, which the plaintiff failed to do.
-
A party seeking a stay of a permanent injunction pending appeal must make a strong showing of likely success on the merits and irreparable injury, which the defendants failed to do.
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's application for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits of its patent infringement claim and will suffer irreparable harm without the requested relief.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding injunctive relief and attorney's fees and costs, because the defendants failed to appear or respond to the complaint alleging ADA violations.
-
In this trademark infringement case, Sprint Communications successfully enforced its rights in the NEXTEL brand against defendants who engaged in counterfeit use of the mark and the "chirp" sound mark, obtaining a jury verdict and $4.5 million judgment after a multi-year litigati
-
The court held that venue was improper in the Middle District of Florida and ordered the case transferred to the District of Oregon.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2025-02-19
A seller of a restaurant failed to disclose unpaid sales and use taxes to the buyer. The buyer obtained a preliminary injunction freezing the seller's assets to prevent her alleged flight to Venezuela. The appellate court reversed, holding that a monetary judgment for breach of c
-
Injunctions for protection against domestic violence require evidence of imminent danger of becoming a victim of domestic violence, and such injunctions cannot be used as substitutes for Baker Act or guardianship proceedings.
-
The court denied the defendant's motion to stay a preliminary injunction pending appeal, finding the defendant failed to establish any of the four required elements.
-
Two daughters obtained domestic violence protective injunctions against their mother, Melanie Beres. The Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed both injunctions, holding that the evidence did not establish imminent danger of domestic violence, and noting that these statutes are
-
Rustik Haws, LLC, a publishing company, sued defendants for misappropriating its trade secrets, clients, and copyrighted materials after IDENTIQA Solutions and a competitor, Lime Press, improperly accessed its confidential information and diverted customers through deceptive prac
-
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
-
In this default judgment case, the district court adopted the magistrate judge's report and granted plaintiff's motion for final default judgment, making a preliminary injunction permanent and awarding $450,000 in combined actual and punitive damages against defendants who failed
-
The court accepted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, denying the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order.
-
The court held that the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction was denied without prejudice due to failure to comply with procedural requirements.
-
A civil action cannot be commenced by filing a motion for temporary restraining order without an accompanying complaint.
-
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting TLM Global's motion for a preliminary injunction and denying Fokiss's motion.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, a prerequisite for a preliminary injunction, due to judicial immunity.
-
Wife appeals a final judgment of injunction for protection against domestic violence entered by the trial court in favor of Husband. The appellate court affirmed the injunction, finding it was supported by competent, substantial evidence and that the trial court properly exercise
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to stay an appraisal process because it was not properly before the court and the plaintiff failed to meet the requirements for injunctive relief.
-
The court denied the defendant's motion to dismiss, finding that the complaint stated a claim for fraud under the CEA and that the court had personal jurisdiction over the defendant due to nationwide service of process under the CEA and the defendant's minimum contacts with the U
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-01-16
The Court strikes Plaintiff's motions and enjoins him from future filings without attorney representation or leave of court.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2025-01-15
A trial court may not issue a temporary injunction or order immediate property transfer based on disputed factual issues without complying with the four-part test for temporary injunctions and without using an authorized procedure to resolve the factual disputes, such as summary
-
The court denied the request for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) because the defendant had appeared and responded to the motion. The request for a preliminary injunction was taken under advisement.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to carry his burden of persuasion regarding the balance of hardships.
-
The Court of Chancery denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order to retrieve his deceased horse's remains from a landfill. The court found that while it had subject matter jurisdiction under the clean-up doctrine, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the
-
An anti-suit injunction is properly issued against a party who initiates litigation in violation of an executed forum selection clause designating Miami-Dade County, Florida as the exclusive venue for disputes.
-
Mohammed Alsaloussi and Alsaloussi Holdings, LLC appealed a trial court's order granting an emergency temporary injunction that prohibited them from liquidating, selling, or disposing of a 2018 Porsche 911 Turbo Classic pending final judgment. The appellate court affirmed the inj
-
The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because she failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, demonstrate irreparable harm without an adequate legal remedy, provide for security, a
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants for trademark and patent infringement and counterfeiting.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of her Administrative Procedure Act claim, thus denying her motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction because they failed to meet the required legal standard and procedural rules.
-
The court recommended granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding sufficient allegations for copyright and trademark infringement, and entitlement to injunctive relief and statutory damages.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and granted the Plaintiff's motion for a Temporary Restraining Order.
-
The court denied the motion to lift the monition and injunction, finding that the case is a multiple-claims-inadequate-fund situation where all claims must be adjudicated in the admiralty court.
-
Aspire Health Partners, a nonprofit healthcare provider holding trademark registrations for "ASPIRE HEALTH PARTNERS," "ASPIRE HEALTH," and "ASPIRE," sought a preliminary injunction against Aspire MGT LLC, a nursing home operator using the similar mark "ASPIRE HEALTH GROUP" on its