521 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,043 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court held that the district judge did not err in denying the defendants' motion for a directed verdict or judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and that the admission of expert testimony was proper.
-
761 F.2d 242·
5th Cir.·
1985-05-28
·cited 60×
A state prosecutor is absolutely immune from liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for maliciously presenting evidence to a grand jury, even if calculated to clear a suspect.
-
The court held that the trial court's jury instructions on municipal liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 were too lax and did not comply with the established standard for proving a custom or policy, requiring a new trial.
-
768 F.2d 503·
3d Cir.·
1985-06-27
·cited 58×
The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the complaint because the allegations, if proven, could establish a "special relationship" between the child protective services agency and the deceased child, giving rise to an affirmative duty to protect. The court foun
-
The court held that the trial judge erred in submitting the due process liberty interest claim to the jury because there was no evidence to support it.
-
528 F.2d 499·
5th Cir.·
1976-02-27
·cited 58×
-
735 F.2d 861·
5th Cir.·
1984-07-09
·cited 57×
A municipality is liable under § 1983 for deprivations of constitutional rights only if inflicted pursuant to official policy, which includes adopted policy statements or widespread, persistent practices known to policymakers.
-
Antonio May died in Fulton County Jail on September 11, 2018, following an altercation with officers during which he was restrained and subjected to physical force while experiencing acute methamphetamine intoxication and psychological distress. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the
-
The district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the second amendment to the complaint would be futile, and therefore, further proceedings would be a waste of resources.
-
-
The court held that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the height limitation and pre-1971 hiring procedures. The court also found that the attempted use of the 1972 examination was a Title VII violation, but the imposition of hiring quotas was not warranted.
-
922 F.2d 712·
11th Cir.·
1991-01-28
·cited 55×
The court held that it has jurisdiction to review the denial of qualified immunity even when factual disputes exist, and that the superintendent's failure to act on known medical deficiencies could constitute deliberate indifference, but the attending physician's actions did not
-
817 F.2d 711·
11th Cir.·
1987-05-26
·cited 55×
Prosecutors are entitled to absolute immunity for acts intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process, but claims accrue when the plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the injury and the perpetrator.
-
712 F.2d 339·
8th Cir.·
1983-07-11
·cited 55×
The dissenting judge believes the district court properly granted judgment n.o.v. and would remand for a new trial on damages if liability is assumed.
-
The court held that the officer was entitled to qualified immunity because the law was not clearly established that he violated the Fourth Amendment by using deadly force without a warning in these specific circumstances.
-
916 F.2d 1521·
11th Cir.·
1990-11-07
·cited 54×
The court held that prior precedent improperly granted Eleventh Amendment immunity to Alabama county sheriffs without a proper analysis of state funding for judgments.
-
The court held that the City failed to preserve most of its challenges to jury instructions and sufficiency of evidence due to procedural defaults, and that any errors in the qualified immunity instruction were harmless.
-
761 F.2d 812·
1st Cir.·
1985-03-29
·cited 54×
The court held that genuine issues of material fact existed regarding the liability of Chief Forni and the Town of Saugus under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, precluding summary judgment.
-
A jury question was presented as to whether certain officers and jailers falsely arrested, imprisoned, or denied medical care to the plaintiff, but not as to others or the City.
-
919 F.2d 665·
11th Cir.·
1990-12-18
·cited 53×
The court held that while punitive damages may be appropriate, appellate courts cannot mandate their award, as this is a discretionary decision for the fact finder. The majority's imposition of punitive damages constituted an abuse of discretion.
-
877 F.2d 947·
11th Cir.·
1989-07-20
·cited 53×
A county cannot be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for a district attorney's prosecutorial decisions, as the district attorney acts as a state official, not a county policymaker, under Georgia law.
-
The court held that a public censure resolution by a city council, if retaliatory, can violate First Amendment rights and procedural due process, but not the Sixth Amendment or the prohibition against bills of attainder if it lacks the force of law.
-
The court held that intervening Supreme Court decisions require a new trial for the City of Stroud and officials in their official capacities due to changes in municipal immunity law, but affirmed the judgment for individual defendants in their personal capacities based on suffic
-
929 F.2d 633·
11th Cir.·
1991-04-25
·cited 52×
A municipality is not liable under § 1983 for a mayor's criminal acts unless those acts were officially sanctioned or made pursuant to a municipal policy by an official with final policy-making authority. A prevailing party may recover costs even if paid by a non-party insurer.
-
The court held that the RICO claims were barred by res judicata because the plaintiffs failed to raise their fraud claims as defenses in the prior state court foreclosure proceedings. However, the court reversed the district court's injunction against state court proceedings, fin
-
The court held that the trial court erred in submitting the due process claims to the jury, as the plaintiff failed to establish a property interest in continued employment or a liberty interest in her reputation, and the erroneous submission was not harmless error given the gene
-
The court held that the city's new ordinance was an unconstitutional taking and that municipalities do not have qualified immunity in § 1983 actions.
-
The court held that while state law primarily governs family relations, the Constitution protects fundamental rights within family life, and state interference with these rights may be actionable under Section 1983 if egregious and lacking due process.
-
600 F.2d 458·
4th Cir.·
1979-06-29
·cited 52×
The court held that summary judgment was improperly granted because genuine issues of material fact existed and the pro se plaintiff did not receive proper notice of the conversion of a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment.
-
810 F.2d 1363·
5th Cir.·
1987-02-27
·cited 51×
Excludable aliens are entitled to due process protections against gross physical abuse while detained in the U.S., but officials may be shielded by qualified immunity if their conduct did not violate clearly established law. State agencies are not protected by individual official
-
783 F.2d 319·
2d Cir.·
1986-02-11
·cited 51×
A municipality can be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for a policy of deliberate indifference to its officers' use of excessive force, and evidence of unadjudicated third-party claims is admissible to prove such a policy.
-
836 F.2d 346·
7th Cir.·
1988-01-07
·cited 50×
The court held that a pretrial detainee's claim for failure to protect falls under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, not the Eighth Amendment, and that the county could be liable under section 1983 for a policymaker's decision.
-
754 F.2d 719·
7th Cir.·
1985-01-30
·cited 50×
The concurring judge agrees that Sheriff Frantz was shielded by qualified immunity, but disagrees with the majority's reasoning regarding the clarity of the duty to release the prisoner.
-
682 F.2d 1344·
9th Cir.·
1982-08-03
·cited 50×
The court held that the Eleventh Amendment does not bar actions for injunctive or declaratory relief against state officials sued in their official capacities under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and that dismissal of certain defendants in their official capacities was erroneous.
-
677 F.2d 681·
8th Cir.·
1982-05-14
·cited 50×
The court held that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict against Sheriff Pirch and Deputy Kipping, and that Kipping was entitled to qualified immunity.
-
The court held that attorney's fees should only be awarded for the claim upon which the plaintiff prevailed, not for unsuccessful claims, and remanded for recalculation.
-
A district court has the discretion to compel an incarcerated party's presence at trial via writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, and a prison memorandum may be admissible under the business records exception if a proper foundation is laid.
-
The court held that the jury's findings on § 1983 claims were not sufficient to establish a Title VII hostile work environment claim, and that certain judgments n.o.v. were appropriate while others were not.
-
862 F.2d 1177·
5th Cir.·
1989-01-12
·cited 49×
Qualified immunity shields officials if their actions were reasonably thought consistent with established rights, assessed by objective reasonableness against clearly established law.
-
The court held that allegations of bias and conspiracy in pre-termination hearings, even if true, do not state a procedural or substantive due process claim when a post-termination administrative remedy is available.
-
784 F.2d 277·
7th Cir.·
1986-02-24
·cited 48×
The court held that the district court erred in granting summary judgment because there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the defendants' conduct constituted state action. The court reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
-
The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the § 1983 due process claim, but correctly dismissed the § 504 claim for failure to allege discrimination.
-
The court held that the trial judge did not abuse her discretion in excluding police reports offered as prior consistent statements and in excluding evidence of the plaintiff's prior rape conviction.
-
607 F.2d 1269·
9th Cir.·
1979-10-19
·cited 48×
The court held that the District Attorney and Clerk of Superior Court were immune, but reversed summary judgment for the remaining defendants, finding they were not entitled to absolute immunity and the record was insufficient to establish qualified immunity.
-
Marcus Underwood sued the City of Bessemer and two police officers for excessive force after they shot him approximately 20 times during a June 2014 encounter where his slowly-moving car came toward them on a residential street. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed summary judgment for
-
A fifteen-year-old student brought a modified toy pistol to school, triggering a police standoff during which Lieutenant Michael W. Weippert fired a fatal shot to the head. The parents sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Florida law, alleging excessive force and violation of Fourth A
-
912 F.2d 1338·
11th Cir.·
1990-09-25
·cited 47×
The Eleventh Amendment does not protect Florida sheriffs, acting as county officials, from liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish that the City's customs or policies were the moving force behind the constitutional injury or that the officer's alleged violent propensity constituted a continuous condition for nuisance law.
-
The court held that the district court did not err in granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict for the city and chief, nor in denying a new trial, as there was insufficient evidence of a municipal policy to allow the use of a dangerous instrumentality.
-
693 F.2d 733·
8th Cir.·
1982-11-12
·cited 47×
The court held that summary judgment was improperly granted because genuine issues of material fact exist regarding whether the city deprived developers of zoning rights without due process and whether city officials conspired with private developers to restrain trade.