1,015 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,841 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
Child protective services workers are entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity in their official capacities and qualified immunity in their individual capacities because their actions did not violate clearly established constitutional rights.
-
A prisoner's claim for excessive force under the Eighth Amendment fails if the injury sustained is not significant.
-
901 F.2d 915·
11th Cir.·
1990-05-18
·cited 10×
-
902 F.2d 770·
9th Cir.·
1990-05-10
·cited 10×
The court held that a directed verdict was proper because the officer had probable cause to arrest for auto tampering, and thus no Fourth Amendment violation occurred. However, the award of attorneys' fees to the defendant was reversed as the plaintiff's action was not frivolous.
-
901 F.2d 1501·
9th Cir.·
1990-05-01
·cited 10×
The court held that the officers used only reasonable force to retake custody of the inmate, and therefore, no constitutional injury occurred.
-
The court held that the evidence did not support a finding that individual defendants had notice of a pattern of unconstitutional acts or were deliberately indifferent, nor did it establish a custom of deliberate indifference by the District, thus affirming summary judgment.
-
899 F.2d 612·
7th Cir.·
1990-04-05
·cited 10×
The court held that the district court erred by entering summary judgment against a pro se prisoner without providing him notice of the conversion of dismissal motions into summary judgment motions and an opportunity to respond.
-
897 F.2d 1409·
7th Cir.·
1990-03-16
·cited 10×
A plaintiff must establish a property interest, a legitimate claim of entitlement, to prevail under the due process clause in the employment context. A village ordinance combining the clerk and collector roles, without more, does not create a property interest in the collector po
-
The court held that the jury's finding of deliberate indifference was supported by evidence, the punitive damage award was valid, and qualified immunity did not apply. However, the case was remanded for determination of pre-death compensatory damages.
-
896 F.2d 179·
6th Cir.·
1990-01-17
·cited 10×
The court held that the one-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions under Ky. Rev. Stat. § 413.140(1)(a) applies to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims in Kentucky, and the plaintiff's action was untimely.
-
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support a liability judgment against the City and Sergeant Dlubak, as the victim was in state custody or the death resulted from an official policy. The Supreme Court's decision in DeShaney did not compel a judgment notwithstandi
-
889 F.2d 9·
1st Cir.·
1989-11-08
·cited 10×
The court held that the plaintiff received adequate procedural due process, but that her termination was politically motivated, violating her First Amendment rights.
-
885 F.2d 1473·
9th Cir.·
1989-09-21
·cited 10×
The court held that sanctions for mere negligence in failing to join the district court bar are improper, and attorneys' fees can only be awarded for bad faith or willful disobedience.
-
Washington Department of Social and Health Services caseworkers are entitled to absolute immunity for their actions taken in child dependency proceedings, including post-adjudication activities.
-
882 F.2d 1165·
7th Cir.·
1989-08-11
·cited 10×
The court held that the plaintiff lacked standing because he did not suffer a personal injury fairly traceable to the defendant's conduct and redressable by the court.
-
Shareholders lack standing to bring individual causes of action under RICO or for civil rights violations when their alleged injury is an indirect result of harm to the corporation.
-
A writ of mandamus is not the proper vehicle to challenge an order disqualifying counsel because such orders are not immediately appealable and can be reviewed on appeal of a final judgment.
-
The court held that a prisoner's subsequent civil rights action challenging a drug violation was barred by res judicata because it arose from the same nucleus of operative fact as a prior, settled action challenging a riot violation, even if the drug violation was not explicitly
-
868 F.2d 793·
5th Cir.·
1989-03-30
·cited 10×
The court held that the plaintiff's § 1983 action was time-barred by Louisiana's one-year statute of limitations for delictual actions.
-
868 F.2d 162·
5th Cir.·
1989-03-22
·cited 10×
The court held that while a jury's verdict on damages is generally inviolate, nominal damages can be awarded when a constitutional right is violated but actual damages are not proven.
-
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to produce significantly probative evidence of a municipal policy or custom that caused the decedent's death, and the City's supervision was not deliberately indifferent.
-
The court held that the City of Hemet and its police officers did not preserve all their challenges to the jury instructions and that sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict on the various constitutional claims, affirming the judgment.
-
537 So. 2d 706·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1989-02-01
·cited 10×
The question of a state's sovereign immunity to an action brought in state court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is a matter of state law, and Florida has not waived its sovereign immunity for such actions except as provided by statute for traditional tort actions.
-
865 F.2d 1131·
9th Cir.·
1989-01-19
·cited 10×
The court held that a temporary three-day deprivation of an inmate's legal materials, without fault of the defendants, does not rise to a constitutional deprivation of access to the courts, and general allegations of harassment are insufficient to state an Eighth Amendment claim.
-
865 F.2d 77·
4th Cir.·
1989-01-09
·cited 10×
The court held that an order striking a defense of absolute legislative immunity is immediately appealable because it conclusively determines the disputed question, resolves an important issue separate from the merits, and is effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgme
-
862 F.2d 850·
11th Cir.·
1989-01-04
·cited 10×
-
An officer making an arrest based on a facially valid warrant, even if later found invalid, is entitled to qualified immunity if their actions were objectively reasonable. A municipality is not liable for an employee's violation if its policy, if followed, would have prevented th
-
851 F.2d 605·
2d Cir.·
1988-07-12
·cited 10×
The court held that the magistrate correctly applied the Fourth Amendment's reasonableness standard to the officer's use of deadly force, even though the incident occurred before the Supreme Court's decision in Tennessee v. Garner, and affirmed the damages award.
-
The court held that the district court erred by failing to consider all of the plaintiff's claims when dismissing the complaint, and that claims based on rules not properly filed may be valid if the plaintiff lacked notice.
-
848 F.2d 163·
11th Cir.·
1988-06-27
·cited 10×
The court held that a judge is protected by judicial immunity for actions taken in a judicial capacity, even if procedural errors occurred, and that federal courts should not review state court decisions.
-
847 F.2d 1130·
5th Cir.·
1988-06-13
·cited 10×
The court held that the prisoner was not entitled to a stay of execution because his section 1983 claim, based on the premise that a Louisiana statute unconstitutionally limited his federal right to seek Supreme Court review, lacked merit. The federal statute does not grant the a
-
845 F.2d 553·
5th Cir.·
1988-05-23
·cited 10×
The dissenting judge argues that the majority opinion unnecessarily reached the merits of the case, which should have been dismissed due to a pleading defect.
-
The court held that the Wozniaks' Section 1983 claims were barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel, as the issues and claims could have and were litigated in the prior state court mandamus action. The court affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment.
-
A prosecutor is absolutely immune from suit for actions taken within the scope of his prosecutorial duties, including offering to dismiss criminal charges in exchange for a release of civil liability, provided the agreement is voluntary and the prosecutor has legitimate reasons f
-
The court held that Daytona Beach Zoning Ordinance No. 81-292 is a constitutional time, place, and manner restriction on adult theaters, serving a substantial governmental interest in combating urban blight and promoting redevelopment, and allowing for ample alternative channels
-
834 F.2d 709·
8th Cir.·
1987-12-04
·cited 10×
The court held that the Department's policy did not create a liberty interest and that the lack of intent to deprive the inmate of any interest defeated his section 1983 action. Furthermore, a failure to properly classify an inmate under state law does not constitute a constituti
-
832 F.2d 294·
4th Cir.·
1987-11-02
·cited 10×
The court held that the appeal is moot due to a settlement, and therefore vacates the district court's order and remands for dismissal of the action, except for the ancillary claim for costs and attorney's fees.
-
829 F.2d 1441·
8th Cir.·
1987-09-29
·cited 10×
The court held that the district court erred in dismissing claims that prison officials wrongfully confiscated a memorandum and discriminated in handling mail from a religious organization, but did not err in dismissing the overbreadth claim.
-
The judge issuing a writ of attachment must have discretion to inquire into the veracity of the creditor's allegations, not just facial sufficiency, to satisfy constitutional due process requirements.
-
825 F.2d 946·
6th Cir.·
1987-07-23
·cited 10×
The court held that the plaintiff's voluntary election to sue in the Ohio Court of Claims constituted a waiver of her federal claims against state employees, as the Ohio statute provided a reasonable alternative forum and remedy.
-
819 F.2d 1393·
7th Cir.·
1987-05-22
·cited 10×
The court held that while the jury's finding of liability for a First Amendment violation was supported by evidence, the compensatory and punitive damage awards were excessive and must be reconsidered.
-
816 F.2d 977·
4th Cir.·
1987-04-28
·cited 10×
Summary judgment was inappropriate because a genuine dispute of material fact exists regarding whether the defendant prison official acted with deliberate indifference to a known risk of harm to the inmate.
-
The court held that the Indian tribes' treaty interpretation claims do not give rise to a claim cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and therefore do not support an award of attorneys' fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988.
-
813 F.2d 178·
8th Cir.·
1987-03-06
·cited 10×
The court held that appellants did not have a constitutionally protected property interest in the occupancy certificate because they failed to comply with the requirements for its issuance, thus affirming summary judgment.
-
813 F.2d 821·
7th Cir.·
1987-03-04
·cited 10×
The court held that the action was barred by the Tax Injunction Act and the principle of comity, and that judicial and prosecutorial defendants were immune from liability.
-
806 F.2d 801·
8th Cir.·
1986-12-05
·cited 10×
The court held that dismissing a pro se plaintiff's complaint with prejudice for failure to comply with a pretrial order, without a clear record of delay or contumacious conduct, constitutes an abuse of discretion.
-
807 F.2d 95·
7th Cir.·
1986-12-03
·cited 10×
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to allege sufficient facts to support an inference of bad faith prosecution, thus the district court properly abstained under the Younger doctrine.
-
811 F.2d 260·
5th Cir.·
1986-10-17
·cited 10×
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the appointment of counsel for a section 1983 claim, and that the appeal was not frivolous.
-
The appellate court reversed a final judgment for the defendants, finding that the trial court erred in denying the plaintiffs' requested jury instruction regarding the truck driver's duty of care.
-
792 F.2d 760·
8th Cir.·
1986-06-11
·cited 10×
The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the inmate's pro se complaint for failure to state a claim, as it alleged a deprivation of property without due process.