Zone Of Interests Test

500 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Jarecki v. United States
  590 F.2d 670· 7th Cir.· 1979-01-09 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the GSA's creation of the FPS was within its statutory authority and that plaintiffs failed to exhaust administrative remedies for reclassification claims.
• Vill. OF Bellwood v. Gladstone Realtors
  569 F.2d 1013· 7th Cir.· 1978-01-25 ·cited 10×
  Individuals and a village alleging racial steering have standing to sue under the Fair Housing Act, regardless of whether they used administrative remedies or were direct victims.
• Conservation Council OF N.C. v. Col. Albert C. Costanzo
  505 F.2d 498· 4th Cir.· 1974-11-08 ·cited 10×
  The court held that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate sufficient injury for standing regarding recreational use of private highlands, but remanded for further hearings on potential use of submerged lands.
• Marino L. Iacopi v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States
  451 F.2d 1142· 9th Cir.· 1971-11-12 ·cited 10×
  The court affirmed the FCC's order approving CBS's spin-off of Viacom, finding the Commission's interpretation of its own rules to be reasonable and supported by substantial evidence.
• Trafficante v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.
  446 F.2d 1158· 9th Cir.· 1971-08-06 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue under the Civil Rights Act of 1968 and 42 U.S.C. § 1982 because they were not direct victims of discriminatory housing practices.
• Alameda Conservation Ass'n v. State OF Cal.
  437 F.2d 1087· 9th Cir.· 1971-01-19 ·cited 10×
  The court held that four individual plaintiffs alleging direct harm from bay filling have standing, while the Association's standing is disputed. The dismissal of the action against the State was affirmed, but the dismissal against Leslie Salt was reversed and remanded.
• City OF Miami v. Wells Fargo & Co.
  923 F.3d 1260· 11th Cir.· 2019-05-03 ·cited 9×
  The City of Miami sued major banks for discriminatory lending practices that violated the Fair Housing Act, alleging the banks' redlining and reverse-redlining caused disproportionate foreclosures on minority-owned properties, which reduced the city's tax revenue and increased mu
• Chicago Mercantile Exch. v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n
  883 F.2d 537· 7th Cir.· 1989-08-18 ·cited 9×
  The court denied the petitions for rehearing, finding that the SEC's arguments did not alter the court's prior conclusions regarding jurisdiction over investment programs (IPs).
• Vieux Carre Prop. Owners v. Colonel Lloyd Kent Brown
  875 F.2d 453· 5th Cir.· 1989-06-14 ·cited 9×
  The court held that a private plaintiff lacks a right of action against non-federal entities for alleged violations of the Rivers and Harbors Act and that the National Historic Preservation Act does not grant such a right against non-agency defendants. However, the plaintiff has
• City OF Milwaukee v. Block
  823 F.2d 1158· 7th Cir.· 1987-07-14 ·cited 9×
  The court held that the plaintiffs have standing to challenge the government's interpretation of the Cargo Preference Act and the Port Preference Clause, and that these claims are not moot despite regulatory changes.
• Ronald v. Dellums
  797 F.2d 817· 9th Cir.· 1986-08-21 ·cited 9×
  The court held that private citizens lack standing to seek judicial review of the Attorney General's refusal to conduct a preliminary investigation under the Ethics in Government Act.
• Mallick v. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers
  749 F.2d 771· D.C. Cir.· 1984-11-27 ·cited 9×
  The court suggests that the Union's failure to adequately disclose potential damages paid to Boswell in its LM-2 report could constitute 'just cause' for a union member to examine the Union's books.
• Dillard & Assocs. Consulting Eng'rs & John A. Dillard, Jr. v. Fla. Dep't of Env't Prot.
  893 So. 2d 702· Fla. 1st DCA· 2005-02-22 ·cited 8×
  Dillard & Associates Consulting Engineers appealed DEP's dismissal of its petition for administrative hearing, arguing lack of standing. The court affirmed, holding that Dillard & Associates lacks standing to challenge the DEP consent order because it may pursue its claims for re
• Sen. Arlen Specter v. Garrett
  971 F.2d 936· 3d Cir.· 1992-04-17 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the statutory scheme for base closures, designed for speed and finality, precludes judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act.
• The Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. The Agric. Stabilization & Conservation Serv.
  955 F.2d 1199· 8th Cir.· 1992-02-05 ·cited 8×
  The court vacated the district court's judgment and remanded the case because subsequent amendments to the relevant statutes provided for a good-faith exemption and graduated sanctions, which required reconsideration by the Secretary of Agriculture.
• Sabine River Auth. v. U.S. Dep't OF Interior
  951 F.2d 669· 5th Cir.· 1992-01-28 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the plaintiffs had standing to challenge the Fish and Wildlife Service's acquisition of a non-development easement under NEPA, even though the district court had dismissed their claims on the merits.
• Coal. for the Pres. of Hispanic Broad. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n
  931 F.2d 73· D.C. Cir.· 1991-04-23 ·cited 8×
  The court held that petitioners lacked standing to challenge FCC decisions regarding license assignments to Hallmark Cards, Inc.
• Benally v. Hodel
  940 F.2d 1194· 9th Cir.· 1990-09-13 ·cited 8×
  The court held that individual members of the Navajo Tribe lack standing to challenge the Relocation Commission's compliance with the Settlement Act, as such procedural rights are vested in the tribal chairmen.
• Simmons v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States
  900 F.2d 1018· 7th Cir.· 1990-04-16 ·cited 8×
  The court held that Patrick Simmons, representing rail employees, lacked standing to petition for review of the ICC's decision because the employees' interest in retaining their jobs is not within the zone of interests protected by the Interstate Commerce Act.
• In re United States Catholic Conf. & Nat'l Conf. of Catholic Bishops v. Baker
  824 F.2d 156· 2d Cir.· 1987-06-04 ·cited 8×
  Non-party witnesses held in civil contempt have standing to appeal only to determine if there is a colorable basis for the district court's subject matter jurisdiction over the underlying suit, not to fully challenge its correctness.
• Sullivan v. Nw. Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist.
  490 So. 2d 140· Fla. 1st DCA· 1986-06-10 ·cited 8×
  Property owners challenged the Department of Environmental Regulation's decision to issue permits for removal of the Dead Lakes Dam without holding an evidentiary hearing on their standing claims. The court held that DER improperly dismissed the petition by finding lack of standi
• Branch Bank & Tr. Co. v. Nat'l Credit Union Admin. Bd.
  786 F.2d 621· 4th Cir.· 1986-03-18 ·cited 8×
  Commercial banks lack standing to challenge the NCUA's approval of a federal credit union's formation because their competitive interests fall outside the zone of interests protected by the Federal Credit Union Act.
• Am. Television & Commc'ns Corp. v. Floken, Ltd.
  629 F. Supp. 1462· M.D. Fla.· 1986-02-14 ·cited 8×
  The court held that a cable television distributor has standing under 47 U.S.C. § 605 to sue hotels that intercept and retransmit subscription programming signals intended for the distributor, as this constitutes an injury redressable by the court.
• John M. Stone, M.D. v. William Beaumont Hosp.
  782 F.2d 609· 6th Cir.· 1986-01-30 ·cited 8×
  The judgment of the district court is affirmed because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the defendants' alleged unlawful activity had a not insubstantial effect on interstate commerce, a prerequisite for Sherman Act jurisdiction.
• In re an Application for Appointment OF Indep. Counsel. Ronald A. Schiavone & the Schiavone Constr. Co. v. United States
  766 F.2d 70· 2d Cir.· 1985-06-24 ·cited 8×
  Appellants lack standing under Article III to seek appointment of independent counsel to investigate and prosecute another individual for alleged perjury.
• Leaf Tobacco Exporters Ass'n, Inc. v. Block
  749 F.2d 1106· 4th Cir.· 1984-12-05 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the exporters lacked standing because their competitive interests were not arguably within the zone of interests protected or regulated by the statutes governing the tobacco price support program.
• Hous. Auth. OF Elliott Cnty. v. Bergland
  749 F.2d 1184· 6th Cir.· 1984-11-19 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the agency's interpretation of the statutory requirement for a 25% local contribution, which necessitated a pro rata division of lot sale proceeds between the government and the local entity, was not clearly erroneous and thus affirmed the grant of summary jud
• Hicks v. S. Md. Health Sys. Agency
  737 F.2d 399· 4th Cir.· 1984-06-18 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the plaintiffs' claims failed because there was insufficient state or federal action, no evidence of Title VI discrimination, lack of standing for the statutory claim, and failure to meet preconditions for the whistleblowing statute.
• Motor Coach Indus., Inc. v. Dole
  725 F.2d 958· 4th Cir.· 1984-01-26 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the Air Carriers Trust Fund was a public instrumentality funded with public money, and the FAA was therefore subject to federal procurement guidelines when awarding the bus contract.
• In re Subpoenas TO Local 478
  708 F.2d 65· 2d Cir.· 1983-05-19 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the denial of the motion to terminate the grand jury investigation and the denial of the motion to quash subpoenas are not appealable orders, but the denial of the motion for return of documents is a final, appealable order.
• Howes Leather Co., Inc. v. Carmen
  680 F.2d 818· D.C. Cir.· 1982-06-15 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the disappointed bidder had standing and stated a claim upon which relief could be granted, reversing the district court's dismissal.
• Marshall & Ilsley Corp. v. Heimann
  652 F.2d 685· 7th Cir.· 1981-06-12 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the plaintiffs, competing banks, lacked standing to challenge the Comptroller's approval of a bank acquisition and branch establishment because their interests were not within the zone of interests protected by the relevant federal and state emergency banking
• United States v. Lewisburg Area Sch. Dist.
  539 F.2d 301· 3d Cir.· 1976-07-16 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the United States has standing to sue to protect its sovereignty over a federal enclave and that the occupation tax at issue is an income tax covered by the Buck Act, but the tax on housewives is not.
• Golden v. Biscayne BAY Yacht Club
  521 F.2d 344· 5th Cir.· 1975-09-26 ·cited 8×
• Fame Publ'g Co., Inc. v. Ala. Custom Tape, Inc.
  507 F.2d 667· 5th Cir.· 1975-01-31 ·cited 8×
  The court held that duplicating a sound recording of a copyrighted musical composition is not a 'similar use' protected by the compulsory license provision of the Copyright Act of 1909.
• Martin-Trigona v. Fed. Reserve Bd.
  509 F.2d 363· D.C. Cir.· 1974-12-06 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the petitioner lacked standing to seek review of the Reserve Board's order because he failed to allege a particularized injury in fact.
• In re The Harwald Co.
  497 F.2d 443· 7th Cir.· 1974-05-16 ·cited 8×
  Unsuccessful bidders in a bankruptcy sale lack standing to challenge the sale's confirmation on antitrust grounds, as such claims are outside the bankruptcy court's jurisdiction.
• The M. M. Crockin Co., Inc. v. Portsmouth Redev. & Hous. Auth.
  437 F.2d 784· 4th Cir.· 1971-02-02 ·cited 8×
  A plaintiff has standing if they allege injury in fact and their interest is within the zone of interests protected by the statute, and a relocation plan must be satisfactorily performed, not just adopted.
• Shands Jacksonville Med. Ctr., Inc. v. State
  123 So. 3d 86· Fla. 1st DCA· 2013-09-12 ·cited 7×
  This consolidated appeal addresses whether existing trauma centers have standing to challenge the Florida Department of Health's grant of provisional licenses to new trauma centers. The court held that existing trauma centers have standing because their substantial economic and o
• MCI Telecomms. Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States
  917 F.2d 30· D.C. Cir.· 1990-10-23 ·cited 7×
  The court held that the FCC improperly relied on cost and price factors when determining that AT&T's integrated service packages were not 'like' aggregated individual services, and remanded this issue for reconsideration. The court also found that the FCC's reasoning on price dis
• Haitian Refugee Ctr., Inc. v. Nelson
  694 F. Supp. 864· S.D. Fla.· 1988-08-22 ·cited 7×
  The court held that it has jurisdiction to hear the case challenging the implementation of the SAW program, and granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction.
• FMC Corp. v. Boesky
  852 F.2d 981· 7th Cir.· 1988-07-21 ·cited 7×
  The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without a comprehensive analysis of the complaint's allegations.
• The Highland Consulting Grp., Inc. v. Soule
  74 F.4th 1352· 11th Cir.· 2023-07-27 ·cited 6×
  The court held that sufficient evidence supported the jury's finding that the plaintiff owned the trade secrets, thus affirming the denial of the defendant's motions for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial.
• City OF Miami v. Citigroup Inc.
  801 F.3d 1268· 11th Cir.· 2015-09-01 ·cited 6×
  The City of Miami sued Citigroup for discriminatory lending practices under the Fair Housing Act (FHA), alleging that the bank engaged in redlining and reverse redlining targeting minority borrowers for predatory loans, resulting in disproportionate foreclosures and reduced tax r
• City OF Miami v. Wells Fargo & Co.
  801 F.3d 1258· 11th Cir.· 2015-09-01 ·cited 6×
  The City of Miami sued Wells Fargo for discriminatory lending practices under the Fair Housing Act (FHA), alleging that the bank engaged in redlining and reverse redlining targeting minority borrowers for predatory loans, resulting in disproportionate foreclosures and reduced pro
• Self-Insurance Inst. OF Am., Inc. v. Korioth
  993 F.2d 479· 5th Cir.· 1993-06-17 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the district court had general federal question jurisdiction and that the plaintiff association had associational standing to bring the action challenging state insurance code provisions as preempted by ERISA.
• Moreau v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n
  982 F.2d 556· D.C. Cir.· 1993-01-15 ·cited 6×
  The court held that it lacked jurisdiction over claims for which rehearing was not timely sought before FERC or which remained pending before FERC. The court found petitioners had standing for remaining claims.
• Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Quigg
  932 F.2d 920· Fed. Cir.· 1991-04-30 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the PTO's notice regarding animal patentability, affirming the dismissal of their claims.
• United States v. Grundhoefer
  916 F.2d 788· 2d Cir.· 1990-10-03 ·cited 6×
  A putative victim is not a party to the determination of restitution, and appellate standing requires injury in fact, but competing claimants to a determined restitution award can show injury.
• United States v. Craig
  907 F.2d 653· 7th Cir.· 1990-07-16 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the time limits for civil appeals apply to petitions for a writ of error coram nobis, and that petitioners must demonstrate lingering civil disabilities causing present harm to justify relief.