Zone Of Interests Test

500 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Int'l Jai-Alai Players Ass'n v. Fla. Pari-Mutuel Comm'n
  561 So. 2d 1224· Fla. 3d DCA· 1990-05-01 ·cited 6×
  The International Jai-Alai Players Association appealed the Florida Pari-Mutuel Commission's denial of standing to contest a fronton owners' application to change jai-alai playing dates. The court affirmed, holding that the Association lacked statutory standing because any injury
• The Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n & the N.D. Wildlife Fed'n v. The Agric. Stabilization & Conservation Serv.
  901 F.2d 673· 8th Cir.· 1990-04-19 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the National Wildlife Federation and its members have standing to challenge the ASCS decision to exempt wetlands from the Swampbuster provisions, as they alleged sufficient injury.
• Amalgamated Transit Union v. Skinner
  894 F.2d 1362· D.C. Cir.· 1990-01-19 ·cited 6×
  The court held that UMTA exceeded its statutory authority under Section 22 of the Urban Mass Transportation Act by promulgating regulations that imposed a uniform, national drug testing program on local transit authorities through rulemaking, rather than requiring locally develop
• Am. Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO v. United States Postal Serv.
  891 F.2d 304· D.C. Cir.· 1989-12-08 ·cited 6×
  The court agrees with the majority opinion that the Postal Service did not adequately justify its rule change permitting international remailing.
• Sec. Indus. Ass'n v. Clarke
  885 F.2d 1034· 2d Cir.· 1989-09-08 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the Securities Industry Association (SIA) has standing to challenge the Comptroller's decision and that the Comptroller's interpretation of the Glass-Steagall Act regarding mortgage pass-through certificates was reasonable, vacating the district court's judgme
• Anthony Abraham Chevrolet Co., Inc. v. Collection Chevrolet, Inc.
  533 So. 2d 821· Fla. 1st DCA· 1988-10-13 ·cited 6×
  Anthony Abraham Chevrolet appealed a Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles order dismissing its protest of a competitor's dealership relocation. The court reversed, holding that section 320.642 applies to dealer relocations and that Abraham's amended petition sufficiently
• Keith v. Volpe
  858 F.2d 467· 9th Cir.· 1988-09-19 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the filing of a supplemental complaint.
• Hoke Co., Inc. v. Tenn. Valley Auth.
  854 F.2d 820· 6th Cir.· 1988-08-04 ·cited 6×
  The court did not reach the merits of the First Amendment claim due to standing issues.
• The Boeing Co. v. Commissioner OF Patents AND Trademarks
  853 F.2d 878· Fed. Cir.· 1988-07-29 ·cited 6×
  The court held that Cegedur, as a reexamination requestor and intervenor, lacked standing to appeal the district court's order because it failed to demonstrate a distinct and palpable injury traceable to the challenged action and falling within the zone of interests protected by
• Shanty Town Assocs. Ltd. P'ship v. Env't Prot. Agency
  843 F.2d 782· 4th Cir.· 1988-04-04 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the EPA had statutory authority to impose grant conditions restricting development to further the FWPCA's water quality goals, and that the plaintiff had standing to challenge these conditions.
• Cal. Cartage Co., Inc. v. United States
  802 F.2d 353· 9th Cir.· 1986-10-14 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the appellants lacked standing to challenge the assessment agreement under the amended Shipping Act of 1984, and that applying the new law would not result in manifest injustice.
• Journal Publ'g Co. v. The Honorable E.L. Mechem
  801 F.2d 1233· 10th Cir.· 1986-09-24 ·cited 6×
  A blanket post-trial order prohibiting all press interviews with former jurors is an impermissible prior restraint on First Amendment rights and constitutes an abuse of discretion.
• Gregory Mktg. Corp. & Daniel Scher v. Wakefern Food Corp. & Red Cheek, Inc.
  787 F.2d 92· 3d Cir.· 1986-03-26 ·cited 6×
  The court held that an intermediary in the chain of distribution, alleging lost revenue due to price discrimination, has standing under Section 4 of the Clayton Act to sue for damages under Section 2(a) of the Robinson-Patman Act.
• The State OF NEW York & The N.Y. State Dep't of Health v. Heckler
  719 F.2d 1191· 2d Cir.· 1983-10-07 ·cited 6×
  The court's decision on the merits is unnecessary as the case is no longer properly before it due to a prior injunction in another circuit.
• Nat'l Treas. Emps'. Union v. Campbell
  654 F.2d 784· D.C. Cir.· 1981-06-05 ·cited 6×
  The court held that neither 18 U.S.C. § 1913 nor section 607(a) of the Treasury, Postal Service and General Government Appropriations Act of 1979 creates a private right of action for individuals to sue government officials for allegedly unlawful lobbying. The appeal regarding pr
• Stenographic Machs., Inc. v. Reg'l Adm'r FOR Emp. & Training of the United States Dep't of Labor
  577 F.2d 521· 7th Cir.· 1978-08-10 ·cited 6×
  The court held that an employer's refusal to use the job bank system, coupled with corroborating information from a union and the State Employment Service, can support the denial of an alien employment certification, even if the employer challenges the reliability of the ISES dat
• Ardale Calvin v. Conlisk
  534 F.2d 1251· 7th Cir.· 1976-04-27 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the plaintiffs, both individual and organizational, lacked the necessary standing to bring their claims, as their allegations of future harm were too speculative and not within the zone of interests protected by the relevant statutes.
• Hood River Cnty. v. The United States
  532 F.2d 1236· 9th Cir.· 1976-02-26 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the grant award, except for a moot procedural issue. Competitor status alone does not confer standing.
• Chicago Hous. Tenants Org., Inc. v. Chicago Hous. Auth.
  512 F.2d 19· 7th Cir.· 1975-02-13 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the district court's order granting a preliminary injunction was not a final judgment and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in issuing the injunction.
• Merkey v. The Bd. OF Regents OF the State OF Fla.
  493 F.2d 790· 5th Cir.· 1974-05-10 ·cited 6×
  The appeal is moot because the appellants are not students and cannot be affected by the decision regarding student organization recognition.
• Pearce Johnson v. Rogers C. B. Morton
  456 F.2d 68· 5th Cir.· 1972-02-03 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the plaintiffs lacked standing because their alleged injury was not a direct injury in fact caused by the federal action, but rather a consequence of state-level decisions regarding fund allocation.
• Whitley v. The Wilson City Bd. OF Educ.
  427 F.2d 179· 4th Cir.· 1970-05-26 ·cited 6×
  White pupils have standing to challenge a dual school system, even if not directly assigned to segregated schools.
• Vill. OF KEY Biscayne v. The Dep't OF Env't Prot.
  206 So. 3d 788· Fla. 3d DCA· 2016-11-09 ·cited 5×
  The Village of Key Biscayne appealed the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's dismissal of its petition challenging an environmental resource permit for temporary floating docks in Biscayne Bay. The court affirmed the dismissal, holding that the Village lacked third-p
• Ulric Paul Giddings v. Chandler
  979 F.2d 1104· 5th Cir.· 1992-12-28 ·cited 5×
  A criminal alien does not have standing to compel the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to commence deportation proceedings under the Mandamus Act or the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) because they do not fall within the 'zone of interest' of the relevant statute.
• Corrosion Proof Fittings v. The Env't Prot. Agency & William K. Reilly
  947 F.2d 1201· 5th Cir.· 1991-10-18 ·cited 5×
  The court held that the EPA failed to muster substantial evidence for its asbestos ban rule due to procedural defects and insufficient consideration of less burdensome alternatives, requiring remand.
• Sioux Falls Cable Television v. State OF S.D.
  838 F.2d 249· 8th Cir.· 1988-01-29 ·cited 5×
  The court held that the State's interception and retransmission of cable television programming into individual prison cells does not fall within the 'private viewing' exception of § 605(b).
• Hong Kong Supermarket v. Kizer
  830 F.2d 1078· 9th Cir.· 1987-10-22 ·cited 5×
  A vendor lacks standing to assert the rights of its customers when its own economic interests and the customers' interests are not aligned, and the vendor has not demonstrated itself to be an effective proponent of those rights.
• Nat'l State Bank OF Elizabeth v. Smith
  591 F.2d 223· 3d Cir.· 1979-01-15 ·cited 5×
  The court held that a recent amendment to the National Bank Act validated the Comptroller's action in limiting a national bank's operations to trust company business, requiring reversal of the district court's judgment. The court also reinstated claims against other defendants fo
• Apache Bend Apts., Ltd. v. United States
  987 F.2d 1174· 5th Cir.· 1993-04-09 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the appellants lacked standing because their alleged injury was a generalized grievance not distinct from the general public.
• First Nat'l Bank & Tr. Co. v. Nat'l Credit Union Admin.
  988 F.2d 1272· D.C. Cir.· 1993-04-02 ·cited 4×
  Plaintiff banks have standing to challenge the NCUA's interpretation of the common-bond requirement under circuit case law and Supreme Court directives.
• Legalization Assistance Project OF the LOS Angeles Cnty. Fed'n OF Labor (AFL-CIO) v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv.
  976 F.2d 1198· 9th Cir.· 1992-09-18 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the district court had subject matter jurisdiction, that organizational plaintiffs had standing, and that certain INS policies regarding legalization applicants under IRCA were ripe for review and contrary to law. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part,
• Diebold v. United States
  947 F.2d 787· 6th Cir.· 1991-10-15 ·cited 4×
  The dissenting judge would affirm the dismissal of the action, finding that the employees lacked standing and that the agency's contracting-out decision was committed to agency discretion.
• Found. ON Econ. Trends v. Lyng
  943 F.2d 79· D.C. Cir.· 1991-09-06 ·cited 4×
  The court held that plaintiffs have standing under the APA and NEPA, but they failed to state a claim under NEPA section 102(2)(C) because the alleged deficiencies in the USDA's germplasm program were not the proximate cause of the global loss of germplasm.
• Buddy Cramer v. Skinner
  931 F.2d 1020· 5th Cir.· 1991-05-09 ·cited 4×
  The court held that Cramer has standing to challenge the Love Field amendment and that the amendment does not violate his right to interstate travel.
• Nash v. Bowen
  869 F.2d 675· 2d Cir.· 1989-03-07 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the Secretary's efforts to improve the quality and efficiency of Administrative Law Judges' work did not infringe upon their decisional independence, and the plaintiff lacked standing to challenge the non-acquiescence policy.
• Petro-Chem Processing, Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency
  866 F.2d 433· D.C. Cir.· 1989-01-13 ·cited 4×
  The court held that petitioners lack standing to challenge EPA regulations because their alleged injuries are either outside the zone of interests protected by RCRA or are self-inflicted and not traceable to the challenged agency action. Furthermore, attempts to establish standin
• Foremost Sales Promotions, Inc. v. Dir., Bureau OF Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms & David R. Chupp, Midwest Reg'l Regulatory Adm'r
  860 F.2d 229· 7th Cir.· 1988-09-23 ·cited 4×
  The court held that Foremost has standing to challenge the Bureau's enforcement actions and that the 'tied house' and 'commercial bribery' provisions of the FAA Act require a showing of supplier control or the potential for it, not merely an effect on sales.
• Manasota Osteopathic Gen. Hosp., Inc. v. State
  523 So. 2d 710· Fla. 1st DCA· 1988-04-06 ·cited 4×
  Manasota Osteopathic General Hospital challenged the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services' denial of its certification of need (CON) application for an osteopathic teaching hospital in Sarasota County. The court affirmed the denial, holding that competing allopathic h
• Sacilor v. United States
  815 F.2d 1488· Fed. Cir.· 1987-03-31 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the plaintiffs lacked standing and their claims were moot, thus the trial court lacked jurisdiction.
• RJG CAB, Inc. v. Hodel
  797 F.2d 111· 3d Cir.· 1986-07-23 ·cited 4×
  This court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over appeals concerning standing and ripeness when those issues involve the interpretation or application of the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act (EPAA) and its regulations; such appeals belong exclusively to the Temporary Emergency
• Locals 666 & 780 OF the Int'l Alliance OF Theatrical Stage Emps. & Moving Picture Mach. Operators OF the United States & Canada, AFL-CIO v. United States Dep't OF Labor
  760 F.2d 141· 7th Cir.· 1985-04-15 ·cited 4×
  Former service employees and their union lack standing to sue under the Administrative Procedure Act for a violation of the Service Contract Act when their work was consolidated into a successor contract without a wage determination.
• R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Comm'n
  728 F.2d 815· 6th Cir.· 1984-03-09 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the intervenor, a third-party manufacturer, lacked standing to appeal the Commission's finding that its product contained asbestos, as it was not within the zone of interests protected by the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
• DOE v. Blum
  729 F.2d 186· 2d Cir.· 1984-02-24 ·cited 4×
  The court held that plaintiffs lacked standing to claim denial of services, and that New York's practice of sending family planning information to the head of the household complied with federal law.
• Nely L. Johnson v. Sedley N. Stuart
  702 F.2d 193· 9th Cir.· 1983-03-25 ·cited 4×
  The court held that public school teachers lacked standing to challenge the constitutionality of Oregon's textbook selection statute, but students and parents did have standing and their claims were ripe for review.
• The Benton Franklin Riverfront Trailway & Bridge Comm. v. Drew Lewis
  701 F.2d 784· 9th Cir.· 1983-03-15 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the Secretary of Transportation acted arbitrarily in his Section 4(f) determination by failing to consider all feasible and prudent alternatives, specifically the potential for federal funding for the bridge's preservation or rehabilitation.
• United States v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n
  655 F.2d 247· D.C. Cir.· 1980-12-29 ·cited 4×
  The Department of Justice (DOJ) lacks standing to appeal Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) orders approving international conference agreements under § 15 of the Shipping Act, as Congress did not intend for DOJ to have such a supervisory role and the dispute is an interagency pol
• Ludlow Corp. v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n
  604 F.2d 704· D.C. Cir.· 1979-08-09 ·cited 4×
  The court held that an SEC order approving an application for unlisted trading privileges is a final order subject to judicial review, and that substantial evidence supported the SEC's finding that such privileges were consistent with fair and orderly markets and investor protect
• Ellis v. United States Dep't OF Hous. & Urban Dev.
  551 F.2d 13· 3d Cir.· 1977-02-24 ·cited 4×
  Tenants of non-subsidized § 220 housing are not entitled to a hearing prior to HUD approval of a rental increase requested by their landlord.
• Econ. Opportunity Comm'n OF Nassau Cnty., Inc. v. Casper Weinberger
  524 F.2d 393· 2d Cir.· 1975-08-06 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the administrative proceedings were not a nullity despite HEW's failure to formally prescribe procedures, as NCEOC was not prejudiced and received adequate notice and opportunity to be heard. The court also affirmed HEW's authority to directly fund GCD.
• Corey v. City OF Dallas
  492 F.2d 496· 5th Cir.· 1974-04-10 ·cited 4×