Zone Of Interests Test

500 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Cole Vision Corp. & Visionworks, Inc. v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg.
  688 So. 2d 404· Fla. 1st DCA· 1997-02-14 ·cited 12×
  Cole Vision Corporation and Visionworks challenged a Florida administrative rule prohibiting corporations from employing or affiliating with optometrists to provide optometric services. While the court reversed the standing denial, it affirmed the rule's validity as a proper impl
• Televisual Commc'ns, Inc. v. State
  667 So. 2d 372· Fla. 1st DCA· 1995-11-29 ·cited 12×
  Televisual Communications, Inc. (TVC), a producer of medical educational videos, challenged proposed administrative rules requiring a certified instructor to be present during audiovisual training courses for physician certification under Florida's workers' compensation law. The
• Schiffels v. Kemper Fin. Servs.
  978 F.2d 344· 7th Cir.· 1992-10-27 ·cited 12×
  A plaintiff has standing to sue under RICO for conspiracy if injured by an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, even if that act is not a predicate act of racketeering.
• Hazardous Waste Treatment Council v. Thomas
  885 F.2d 918· D.C. Cir.· 1989-09-15 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the Hazardous Waste Treatment Council (HWTC) lacked standing to challenge the EPA's 'California List' rules because its members' interests were not arguably within the zone of interests protected by the relevant statute.
• Animal Prot. Inst. OF Am. v. Hodel
  860 F.2d 920· 9th Cir.· 1988-10-31 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the Secretary of the Interior may not transfer title of wild horses and burros to adopters when the Secretary knows the adopters intend to use the animals for commercial purposes, as this contravenes congressional intent to prevent exploitation.
• Public Citizen v. Nat'l Hwy. Traffic Safety Admin.
  848 F.2d 256· D.C. Cir.· 1988-06-07 ·cited 12×
  The court held that petitioners lacked standing to sue under the EPCA due to speculative injuries regarding fuel-efficient automobiles, fuel consumption, and environmental concerns.
• Fors v. Honorable John Lehman, Jr.
  741 F.2d 1130· 9th Cir.· 1984-08-28 ·cited 12×
  A non-dependent mother lacks standing to sue on behalf of her son, who was reclassified from missing in action to killed in action, as she is not a real party in interest and her alleged injury falls outside the zone of interests protected by the relevant statutes.
• Cal. Cartage Co., Inc. v. United States
  721 F.2d 1199· 9th Cir.· 1983-12-12 ·cited 12×
  The court held that off-dock container freight station operators have standing under the Shipping Act's 'detriment to commerce' standard to challenge a maritime labor agreement that allegedly harms their competitive position.
• JET Courier Servs., Inc. v. Fed. Reserve Bank OF Atlanta
  713 F.2d 1221· 6th Cir.· 1983-07-29 ·cited 12×
  The court held that private air couriers lack standing under the Monetary Control Act and that the Federal Reserve Banks are not subject to the Sherman Act.
• United States v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n
  694 F.2d 793· D.C. Cir.· 1982-11-16 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) must conduct a more thorough inquiry into the anticompetitive effects of intermodal rate agreements before approving them under Section 15 of the Shipping Act.
• Gonzales v. Gorsuch
  688 F.2d 1263· 9th Cir.· 1982-09-28 ·cited 12×
  The court held that while Congress can expand standing to the full extent permitted by Article III, it cannot abrogate the constitutional minimums of injury, causation, and redressability. The plaintiff failed to establish redressability.
• Fire Equip. Mfrs'. Ass'n, Inc. v. Marshall
  679 F.2d 679· 7th Cir.· 1982-05-27 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the petitioners, manufacturers and a trade association, lacked standing to challenge OSHA's fire protection standard because their alleged injuries (lost profits, impaired objectives, competitive disadvantage) fell outside the zone of interests protected by th
• Dialysis Ctrs., Ltd. v. Richard S. Schweiker Sec'y of the U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
  657 F.2d 135· 7th Cir.· 1981-08-18 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, affirming the dismissal of the action.
• Wilmington United Neighborhoods v. United States Dep't OF Health
  615 F.2d 112· 3d Cir.· 1980-02-06 ·cited 12×
  The court held that judicial review of a Designated Planning Agency's (DPA) approval of a capital expenditure is not statutorily barred by § 1122(f), as that section only precludes review of the Secretary's determination regarding exclusions from federal payments.
• Robinson v. Knebel
  550 F.2d 422· 8th Cir.· 1977-03-02 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the environmental impact statement, when read with its amplification, adequately complied with NEPA's requirements regarding the discussion of alternatives and cost-benefit analysis, and that the plaintiffs had standing to raise these claims.
• Spangler v. Pasadena City Bd. OF Educ.
  537 F.2d 1031· 9th Cir.· 1976-05-25 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the civil contempt finding is moot and the creation of a review board was an error. Attorney's fees for a self-represented lawyer were properly denied.
• Warner B. Jackson v. Dukakis
  526 F.2d 64· 1st Cir.· 1975-12-01 ·cited 12×
  A plaintiff must demonstrate a direct, concrete injury to establish standing, and failing to apply for a job with the defendant agencies prevents this.
• Nw. Pub. Serv. Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n
  520 F.2d 454· D.C. Cir.· 1975-10-02 ·cited 12×
  The court held that Northwestern was not aggrieved by the FPC's orders and therefore lacked standing to petition for review because the orders did not cause direct economic injury or restrict market growth.
• Consolidated-Tomoka Land Co. v. Butz
  498 F.2d 1208· 5th Cir.· 1974-08-15 ·cited 12×
  The court held that producers have standing to challenge the procedural validity of a marketing order referendum, and affirmed the district court's invalidation of the referendum.
• Warth v. Ira Seldin
  495 F.2d 1187· 2d Cir.· 1974-04-18 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the appellants lacked standing to challenge the Town of Penfield's zoning laws because they failed to allege a sufficient personal stake or concrete injury in fact.
• Nader v. Saxbe
  497 F.2d 676· D.C. Cir.· 1974-04-04 ·cited 12×
  The court held that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue because the repeal of the Federal Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) broke the logical nexus between their alleged injury (lack of campaign information) and the prospective relief sought (mandamus to compel prosecutions).
• Adolphus v. Boris Zebelman
  486 F.2d 1323· 8th Cir.· 1973-10-24 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the plaintiffs had standing to sue under the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act and that the district court did not err in refusing to appoint a receiver or award attorney fees.
• Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency
  481 F.2d 116· 10th Cir.· 1973-06-18 ·cited 12×
  The court held that petitioners lacked standing to seek judicial review of the EPA Administrator's actions because they failed to allege any injury in fact or demonstrate that their interests were within the zone of interests protected by the Clean Air Act Amendments.
• Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Burford
  871 F.2d 849· 9th Cir.· 1989-03-30 ·cited 11×
  The court held that the National Wildlife Federation had standing to sue and that the Secretary of the Interior acted within the law in accepting coal lease bids that did not fall below fair market value.
• Public Citizen v. Fed. Trade Comm'n
  869 F.2d 1541· D.C. Cir.· 1989-03-14 ·cited 11×
  The court held that public health organizations have standing to challenge the FTC's exemption of utilitarian items from smokeless tobacco warning requirements, and that the FTC's exemption was contrary to the Act's mandate.
• Florsheim Shoe Co. v. The United States
  744 F.2d 787· Fed. Cir.· 1984-07-12 ·cited 11×
  The court held that Florsheim had standing to challenge the denial of its protests and that the President acted within his broad discretionary authority under Section 504(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 to withdraw duty-free treatment from Indian leather products.
• Bank Stationers Ass'n, Inc. v. Bd. OF Governors OF the Fed. Reserve Sys.
  704 F.2d 1233· 11th Cir.· 1983-05-12 ·cited 11×
  The court held that the plaintiffs' complaint was not arguably within the zone of interests protected by Section 107 of the Monetary Control Act, and thus they lacked standing.
• Hetherton v. Sears
  652 F.2d 1152· 3d Cir.· 1981-06-25 ·cited 11×
  A Delaware statute requiring freeholder identification for deadly weapon purchases violates the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause because the classification lacks a rational basis.
• Nash v. Califano
  613 F.2d 10· 2d Cir.· 1980-01-07 ·cited 11×
  The court held that the alleged invasion of an Administrative Law Judge's statutory right to decisional independence presents a justiciable controversy, and the appellant has standing to bring suit.
• Off. of Ins. Reg. & Fin. Servs. Comm'n v. Secure Enters., LLC.
  124 So. 3d 332· Fla. 1st DCA· 2013-10-11 ·cited 10×
  The Florida First District Court of Appeal reversed an administrative law judge's final order that had invalidated insurance forms and rules regarding windstorm loss reduction credits. The court held that a garage door manufacturer lacked standing to challenge the rules because i
• NAACP, Inc. v. Fla. Bd. OF Regents & the State Bd. of Educ.
  822 So. 2d 1· Fla. 1st DCA· 2002-02-26 ·cited 10×
  The Florida District Court of Appeal reversed an administrative law judge's decision granting standing to the NAACP and individual plaintiffs to challenge university admissions rule amendments adopted in response to the Governor's directive to eliminate racial and gender preferen
• Dinesh Pandya v. Israel
  761 So. 2d 454· Fla. 4th DCA· 2000-06-07 ·cited 10×
  The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal upheld a trial court's decision invalidating an agreement between Palm Beach County and Dinesh Pandya for the sale of timeshare units held by the County through tax certificates. The court held that Florida Statute § 125.35(1)(a) requir
• Soler v. Scott
  942 F.2d 597· 9th Cir.· 1991-08-01 ·cited 10×
  The court held that an alien detained pending deportation proceedings has standing to seek mandamus and APA relief to compel the INS to schedule a hearing expeditiously after conviction, as required by statute.
• DKT Mem'l Fund Ltd. v. Agency FOR Int'l Dev.
  887 F.2d 275· D.C. Cir.· 1989-10-10 ·cited 10×
  The Agency for International Development (AID) unconstitutionally deployed its funds to restrain the privately-funded speech and association of domestic nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) engaged in family planning work overseas by conditioning aid on foreign NGOs not associati
• Chernin v. Lyng
  874 F.2d 501· 8th Cir.· 1989-05-03 ·cited 10×
  The Secretary of Agriculture may find a meat-packing business unfit if a person responsibly connected to it has a felony conviction, and this determination does not violate the convicted person's due process rights.
• Panhandle Producers & Royalty Owners Ass'n v. Economic Regulatory Administration
  847 F.2d 1168· 5th Cir.· 1988-06-28 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the Economic Regulatory Administration's reliance on 1984 policy guidelines for natural gas import authorizations was proper, rejecting challenges based on procedural flaws and the substance of the guidelines.
• Nat'l Coal Ass'n v. Hodel
  825 F.2d 523· D.C. Cir.· 1987-08-11 ·cited 10×
  The court held that plaintiffs' alleged injuries stemming from anticipated competition or potential anticompetitive discrimination by a railroad were not within the zone of interests protected by FLPMA § 206(a).
• Calumet Indus., Inc. v. Brock
  807 F.2d 225· D.C. Cir.· 1986-12-19 ·cited 10×
  The court held that petitioners lack prudential standing to challenge OSHA's Notice of Interpretation because their interests are not arguably within the zone of interests protected or regulated by the OSH Act.
• Hotel & Rest. Emps. Union v. Attorney General of the United States
  804 F.2d 1256· D.C. Cir.· 1986-10-31 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the union lacked standing to challenge asylum procedures and that an individual's claim was not ripe for review, while the Attorney General's decision on enforcement was unreviewable.
• Representative Stewart B. McKINNEY v. United States Dep't OF the Treas.
  799 F.2d 1544· Fed. Cir.· 1986-08-08 ·cited 10×
  The court held that appellants lacked standing to challenge the Treasury Department's decision not to bar imports of Soviet goods, as their alleged injuries were either not judicially cognizable, not traceable to the challenged action, or not within the zone of interests protecte
• The State OF Mo. v. Colonel William R. Andrews, Jr.
  787 F.2d 270· 8th Cir.· 1986-03-13 ·cited 10×
  The Secretary of the Interior's interpretation that federal reclamation law governs the administration of irrigation water stored in the Oahe Reservoir is a reasonable construction of section 9(c) of the Flood Control Act and is entitled to deference.
• Clayton v. White Hall Sch. Dist.
  778 F.2d 457· 8th Cir.· 1985-11-26 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the plaintiff lacked standing because her alleged economic injury was not within the zone of interests protected by the civil rights laws, and that the district court did not err in denying leave to amend.
• Okla. Hosp. Ass'n v. Okla. Publ'g Co.
  748 F.2d 1421· 10th Cir.· 1984-11-27 ·cited 10×
  The appellate court dismissed the appeal because the appellant, a non-party, lacked standing to challenge protective orders entered in the underlying litigation.
• Hartigan v. Fed. Home Loan Bank Bd. & Fed. Sav. & Loan Ins. Corp.
  746 F.2d 1300· 7th Cir.· 1984-10-22 ·cited 10×
  Emergency acquisitions approved by FSLIC under Section 123 of the Garn Act are subject to judicial review under Section 408(k) of the National Housing Act, and the "committed to agency discretion" exception does not preclude review when statutory guidelines exist. Only FSLIC, not
• Stratman v. Watt
  656 F.2d 1321· 9th Cir.· 1981-09-08 ·cited 10×
  The court held that recreational users have standing to challenge ANCSA land patents, but those without record interests must exhaust administrative remedies. Stratman and Burton, with record interests, were entitled to actual notice and their claims should be considered on reman
• Moore v. Tangipahoa Parish Sch. Bd.
  625 F.2d 33· 5th Cir.· 1980-08-27 ·cited 10×
  The court held that a teacher denied a principal position lacked standing to enforce a prior desegregation order under Rule 71.
• Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Califano
  622 F.2d 1382· 10th Cir.· 1980-04-17 ·cited 10×
• Hollingsworth v. Harris
  608 F.2d 1026· 5th Cir.· 1979-12-26 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the district court had jurisdiction to review whether the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare followed its own procedures and that the petitioner had standing to bring the claim.
• Marchezak v. Myron R. McKINLEY
  607 F.2d 37· 3d Cir.· 1979-10-03 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the Secretary of Agriculture had the authority under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 to issue regulations altering the time and method of payment to producers, as these provisions were incidental to and necessary for effectuating the Act's pur
• Jaimez-Revolla v. Griffin B. Bell
  598 F.2d 243· D.C. Cir.· 1979-03-27 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the Attorney General's denial of the appellant's application for permission to reapply for admission after deportation was not arbitrary or an abuse of discretion, as the appellant had flagrantly violated U.S. immigration laws.