Zone Of Interests Test

500 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Collier Med. Ctr., Inc. v. State
  462 So. 2d 83· Fla. 1st DCA· 1985-01-08 ·cited 18×
  Collier Medical Center sought a certificate of need (CON) to build a 100-bed for-profit hospital in Collier County, Florida. The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services denied the application based on a hearing officer's findings of no demonstrated need and failure to me
• Kozera v. Spirito
  723 F.2d 1003· 1st Cir.· 1983-12-16 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the Commissioner had standing and that sovereign immunity did not bar the third-party complaint, as it sought prospective relief and fell within established exceptions.
• Davis Forestry Corp. v. Smith
  707 F.2d 1325· 11th Cir.· 1983-06-24 ·cited 18×
  Competitors of farm labor contractors do not have standing to sue under the Farm Labor Contractor Registration Act (FLCRA) for alleged violations.
• R.I. Comm. ON Energy v. Gen. Servs. Admin.
  561 F.2d 397· 1st Cir.· 1977-08-16 ·cited 18×
  The court held that plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the sale under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (FPAS) because their interests were not within the zone protected by the Act, and affirmed the denial of attorney fees against the GSA.
• Shiffler v. Schlesinger
  548 F.2d 96· 3d Cir.· 1977-01-12 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying injunctive relief based on laches, considering the significant progress of the military base realignment and potential prejudice to national defense.
• Bradford Sch. BUS Transit, Inc. v. Chicago Transit Auth.
  537 F.2d 943· 7th Cir.· 1976-07-07 ·cited 18×
  Private school bus operators have standing to challenge UMTA's funding of CTA's competing school bus operations, and UMTA's actions are judicially reviewable, but plaintiffs must first exhaust administrative remedies.
• The Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n
  523 F.2d 1344· 9th Cir.· 1975-09-16 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the FCC's failure to impose common carrier obligations on cable television access channels and its limitations on cablecasting by cable owners are within the FCC's broad authority, reasonably ancillary to its responsibilities for regulating television broadcas
• Clinton Cmty. Hosp. Corp. v. S. Md. Med. Ctr.
  510 F.2d 1037· 4th Cir.· 1975-02-10 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the appellant lacked standing to sue and failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
• Friends OF THE Everglades, Inc. v. Bd. OF Trs. OF THE Internal Improvement Tr. Fund & Dep't of Natural Res.
  595 So. 2d 186· Fla. 1st DCA· 1992-02-25 ·cited 17×
  Friends of the Everglades, Inc. appeals the dismissal of its petition for an administrative hearing challenging the state's decision to lease a portion of environmentally protected land acquired under the Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) program to a juvenile detention fa
• Suntex Dairy v. Bergland
  591 F.2d 1063· 5th Cir.· 1979-03-22 ·cited 17×
  Milk producers have standing to seek judicial review of the substantive legality of federal milk marketing orders, but cannot invalidate an order based on a cooperative's violation of an antitrust injunction.
• Ramsey Clark v. Valeo
  D.D.C.· 1977-01-21 ·cited 17×
  The dissent argues that the court should decide the merits of the case due to voter standing, as the one-house veto provision of the Federal Election Campaign Act is constitutionally impermissible.
• Churchill Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n
  533 F.2d 411· 8th Cir.· 1976-04-13 ·cited 17×
  The court held that the Interstate Commerce Commission properly granted RPD a contract carrier permit, following statutory procedures and that petitioners lacked standing to raise an environmental challenge.
• City OF Miami v. Bank OF Am. Corp.
  800 F.3d 1262· 11th Cir.· 2015-09-01 ·cited 16×
  The City of Miami brought a Fair Housing Act claim against Bank of America, alleging that the bank engaged in a decade-long pattern of discriminatory lending targeting black and Latino borrowers for predatory loans, causing minority-owned properties to fall into foreclosure and d
• Defenders OF Wildlife v. Hodel
  851 F.2d 1035· 8th Cir.· 1988-07-08 ·cited 16×
  The court held that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue under Article III of the Constitution because their alleged injury was too speculative and not redressable by the requested relief.
• Nat'l Cottonseed Prods. Ass'n v. Brock
  825 F.2d 482· D.C. Cir.· 1987-08-07 ·cited 16×
  The court held that OSHA acted within its statutory authority and on a rational basis in promulgating regulations for medical surveillance and respirator effectiveness ratings, denying the petitions for review.
• Inv. Co. Inst. & Sec. Indus. Ass'n v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.
  815 F.2d 1540· D.C. Cir.· 1987-04-07 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the FDIC's regulations allowing insured nonmember banks to have subsidiaries or affiliates engaged in securities work do not violate the Glass-Steagall Act or the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.
• Am. Mining Cong. v. Thomas
  772 F.2d 640· 10th Cir.· 1985-09-03 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the EPA promulgated the regulations within the statutory deadline by making them public on September 30, 1983, and that AMAX lacked standing to challenge the designation of molybdenum as a hazardous constituent.
• Denver Metro. Ass'n OF Plumbing v. Journeyman Plumbers & GAS Fitters Local NO. 3 & Pipefitters Local NO. 208 of the United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Indus. of the United States & Canada (AFL-CIO)
  586 F.2d 1367· 10th Cir.· 1978-11-13 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the associations have standing to challenge alleged violations of 29 U.S.C. § 186(c)(5)(B) and that contributions by non-member employers to trust funds do not violate the "written agreement" or "equal representation" requirements of the statute.
• Petrol Stops Northwest v. United States
  571 F.2d 1127· 9th Cir.· 1978-03-20 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the defendants in the civil litigation had standing to appeal the disclosure order of grand jury materials, and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the disclosure subject to a protective order.
• Smith v. S. Side Loan Co.
  567 F.2d 306· 5th Cir.· 1978-02-06 ·cited 16×
  An attorney lacks standing to pursue an appeal after their client has settled the underlying dispute and directed the appeal be dropped.
• Rental Hous. Ass'n OF Greater Lynn, Inc. v. Hills
  548 F.2d 388· 1st Cir.· 1977-01-26 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the plaintiff association's allegations of competitive injury were sufficient to establish standing to challenge HUD's award of financial assistance.
• Rodeway Inns OF Am., Inc. v. Frank
  541 F.2d 759· 8th Cir.· 1976-09-13 ·cited 16×
  The court held that competitor hotel owners lacked standing to challenge HUD's decision to allow a federally insured apartment building to convert to a hotel after the mortgage insurance had been paid out, as the relevant statutes and regulations only applied while the insurance
• Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Hodgson
  515 F.2d 373· D.C. Cir.· 1975-06-26 ·cited 16×
  The Service Contract Act does not provide a remedy for employees to recover damages from a contractor based on the Secretary of Labor's alleged wrongful omission of a wage determination from the contract.
• Schlafly v. Volpe
  495 F.2d 273· 7th Cir.· 1974-02-28 ·cited 16×
  The dissenting judge believes plaintiffs lack standing and the relief sought impinges on sovereign immunity, thus dissenting from reinstatement of the count against federal defendants.
• Nat'l Ass'n OF Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO v. Indep. Postal Sys. OF Am.
  470 F.2d 265· 10th Cir.· 1972-12-06 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the proposed delivery of addressed Christmas cards by a private entity constitutes the delivery of 'letters' under the private express statutes, and the plaintiff union has standing to seek injunctive relief due to threatened economic detriment to its members.
• Springfield Television, Inc. v. The City OF Springfield
  462 F.2d 21· 8th Cir.· 1972-06-12 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the CATV franchise ordinance was invalid because it failed to comply with the city charter's election requirement for public utility franchises, and that a new solicitation of bids was necessary due to updated FCC regulations on franchise fees.
• CC Distribs., Inc. v. United States
  883 F.2d 146· D.C. Cir.· 1989-08-22 ·cited 15×
  The court held that the plaintiffs had standing to challenge the Air Force's decision to convert COCESS operations and that the decision was not committed to unreviewable agency discretion.
• Wehunt v. Ledbetter
  875 F.2d 1558· 11th Cir.· 1989-06-27 ·cited 15×
  The court held that Title IV-D of the Social Security Act does not create an enforceable right for AFDC recipients to sue the state under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and that the plaintiff lacked Article III standing to sue the Secretary for failure to enforce the Act.
• Friends OF THE Earth v. United States Navy
  841 F.2d 927· 9th Cir.· 1988-03-07 ·cited 15×
  The court held that the National Defense Authorization Act prohibits construction until all required permits, including the Washington Shoreline Management Act permit, are issued, and that the environmental groups have standing to seek an injunction.
• Exhibitors' Serv., Inc. v. Am. Multi-Cinema, Inc.
  788 F.2d 574· 9th Cir.· 1986-04-25 ·cited 15×
  A licensing agent, whose termination was part of an antitrust conspiracy between exhibitors to reduce competition, is not a proper party to bring an antitrust action because its injury is indirect and not of the type the antitrust laws were intended to forestall.
• R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Comm'n & Raymond J. Donovan
  708 F.2d 570· 11th Cir.· 1983-06-16 ·cited 15×
  The petitioner, R.T. Vanderbilt Company, lacks standing to appeal the Occupational Safety and Health Commission's decision because it is not within the zone of interests protected or regulated by the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
• P. A. M. News Corp. v. Hardin
  440 F.2d 255· D.C. Cir.· 1971-02-09 ·cited 15×
  The court held that the First Amendment claim was not ripe for decision because the agency failed to provide a statement of the basis for its action, and remanded for consideration of compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act.
• Kroma Makeup EU, LLC v. Boldface Licensing + Branding, Inc.
  920 F.3d 704· 11th Cir.· 2019-04-01 ·cited 14×
  A licensee's right to sue for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act is determined by the rights granted in the licensing agreement, and here, the agreement did not grant Kroma EU sufficient rights to bring such a claim.
• United States v. AVX Corp.
  962 F.2d 108· 1st Cir.· 1992-04-21 ·cited 14×
  An intervenor seeking to appeal after the original parties have settled must independently demonstrate Article III standing, and cannot rely on the original parties' standing.
• City OF LOS Angeles & City of N.Y. v. Nat'l Hwy. Traffic Safety Admin.
  912 F.2d 478· D.C. Cir.· 1990-08-24 ·cited 14×
  The court holds that NRDC has standing under NEPA for the MY 1989 CAFE rollback and that the agency's compliance with environmental review requirements is a merits issue, not a standing issue.
• Congressman Ronald v. Dellums
  863 F.2d 968· D.C. Cir.· 1988-12-16 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the agencies' interpretation of the Anti-Apartheid Act, which permitted the importation of South African uranium hexafluoride, was a reasonable and permissible construction of the statute, and thus the court should defer to their decision.
• In re Surface Water Mgmt. Permit NO. 50-01420-S v. The Fla. Land & Water Adjudicatory Comm'n
  515 So. 2d 1288· Fla. 4th DCA· 1987-09-09 ·cited 14×
  The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission's rescission of a surface water management permit for a 209-unit condominium development on Torry Island in Lake Okeechobee. The court upheld the Commission's determination that the permit vi
• Orange Park Fla. T.V., Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n
  811 F.2d 664· D.C. Cir.· 1987-02-13 ·cited 14×
  The court affirmed the FCC's denial of Orange Park's waiver request but vacated the decision allowing Clay to cure its ownership violation, remanding for findings on reasonable reliance.
• Riverview Invs., Inc. v. Ottawa Cmty. Improvement Corp.
  769 F.2d 324· 6th Cir.· 1985-07-31 ·cited 14×
  The court held that plaintiff's procedural due process claim was properly dismissed, but remanded the antitrust claim for further consideration of the state action exemption.
• Animal Lovers Volunteer Ass'n, Inc. v. Caspar Weinberger
  765 F.2d 937· 9th Cir.· 1985-07-15 ·cited 14×
  The court held that ALVA lacked standing to sue the Navy because it failed to demonstrate a distinct and palpable injury to its members, distinguishing it from the general public's concern.
• DAN Caputo Co. & Wagner Constr. Co. v. Russian River Cnty. Sanitation Dist.
  749 F.2d 571· 9th Cir.· 1984-12-13 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the contractor's challenge to the bid solicitation was moot, and that the contractor lacked standing to challenge the fund reallocation and also lacked a private right of action against the district for that reallocation.
• Shared Servs., Inc. v. State of Fla. Dep't OF Health & Rehabilitative Servs.
  426 So. 2d 56· Fla. 1st DCA· 1983-01-07 ·cited 14×
  Shared Services, Inc. appealed HRS's denial of standing to request a formal hearing on Shands Teaching Hospital's application for air ambulance service licensure and ALS certification. The court affirmed that competitive economic injury alone does not confer standing under Florid
• Safir v. Kreps
  D.D.C.· 1977-02-11 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the appellant retained standing and that issues regarding the Secretary's discretion to mitigate subsidy recovery were not barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel and required further review.
• A. Alexander Jacoby, M.D. v. Fla. Bd. OF Med.
  917 So. 2d 358· Fla. 1st DCA· 2005-12-29 ·cited 13×
  A physician denied a temporary medical license in Florida due to disciplinary action in New York challenged the constitutionality of the licensing rules. The court reversed the administrative decision denying standing, finding the applicant was substantially affected by the chall
• NAACP, Inc. v. Fla. Bd. OF Regents
  863 So. 2d 294· Fla.· 2003-11-13 ·cited 13×
  The Florida Supreme Court held that the NAACP has associational standing to challenge state university admissions rules under the Administrative Procedure Act, reversing the First District's overly restrictive interpretation of standing requirements. The Court reaffirmed that ass
• Ward v. Bd. OF Trs. OF the Internal Improvement Tr. Fund
  651 So. 2d 1236· Fla. 4th DCA· 1995-03-08 ·cited 13×
  A professional engineer challenged proposed amendments to Florida Administrative Code rules governing dock construction in aquatic preserves, claiming he would be substantially affected. The court reversed the dismissal for lack of standing, finding the engineer satisfied both pr
• Dep't OF Prof'l Reg. v. Fla. Dental Hygienist Ass'n, Inc.
  612 So. 2d 646· Fla. 1st DCA· 1993-01-14 ·cited 13×
  The Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Dentistry appealed a hearing officer's invalidation of two proposed rules that would have allowed the Board to approve dental hygiene schools beyond those accredited by the Commission on Dental Accreditation of the Ameri
• City OF Evanston v. Reg'l Transp. Auth.
  825 F.2d 1121· 7th Cir.· 1987-07-10 ·cited 13×
  The court held that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue under the UMT Act and NEPA, and also lacked taxpayer standing to challenge the executive branch's funding decision.
• Colonial Penn Ins. Co. v. Heckler
  721 F.2d 431· 3d Cir.· 1983-11-16 ·cited 13×
  The court held that federal courts have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 to review the constitutional challenge, and that the plaintiff has standing, but ultimately affirmed the dismissal because the plaintiff is not entitled to relief on the merits.
• Julia T. Apter, M.D. v. Elliot L. Richardson
  510 F.2d 351· 7th Cir.· 1975-01-31 ·cited 13×
  The court held that the plaintiff had standing to sue, as she alleged sufficient injury in fact and that her interests fell within the zone of interests protected by the relevant statutes and constitutional guarantees.