798 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 306 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court held that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to review the USCIS decision denying the plaintiffs' application for adjustment of status.
-
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, requiring the defendants to continue providing services under the Transition Services Agreement (TSA). This relief was conditioned upon the plaintiffs posting a $2.8 million monthly surety bond. The court foun
-
The court held that the plaintiff's amended complaint sufficiently alleged an Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against Dr. Papillon to survive a motion to dismiss, but denied the motion for a preliminary injunction due to limitations imposed by the PLRA.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2022-06-27
Plaintiffs have not met their burden to establish standing to pursue preliminary injunctive relief, except potentially for one plaintiff whose motion is reserved.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-22
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish the necessary elements for a preliminary injunction, including a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2022-06-10
Courthouse News Service challenged delays by Florida's Broward County court system in providing public access to newly filed civil complaints, arguing the delays violated the First Amendment's right to access judicial records. The court held that the First Amendment guarantees a
-
The court recommended denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-05-24
Military servicemembers challenged a Department of Defense COVID-19 vaccine mandate on the grounds that it violated their religious freedom rights and other constitutional protections, seeking preliminary injunctive relief to prevent enforcement while the case proceeded. The cour
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-05-09
The court granted Permobil's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding it met the four-part test for such relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-02-28
The court held that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm, thus denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-02-10
A temporary restraining order is appropriate where a trademark owner demonstrates a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of a Lanham Act infringement claim, irreparable injury absent relief, and that the balance of harms favors the injunction. The court may issue an ex
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-02-08
A temporary restraining order is appropriate where a trademark owner demonstrates a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of a Lanham Act claim based on evidence of counterfeit goods bearing its registered marks, irreparable injury from loss of sales and erosion of good
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-02-07
The court held that a plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must demonstrate irreparable harm, and Florida's statutory presumption of irreparable harm for restrictive covenant violations does not apply in federal court.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-01-13
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, primarily due to a lack of demonstrated federal jurisdiction.
-
The court held that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, thus denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-11-18
Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc., and Costa Del Mar, Inc. sued 138 defendants for counterfeiting and infringing their registered trademarks by advertising, promoting, and selling counterfeit eyewear and related products through online marketplaces and websites. The court gran
-
The court held that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the petition due to the probate exception and Eleventh Amendment, and that federal habeas relief is unavailable for guardianship challenges.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-25
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because it sought a mandatory injunction, which carries a heightened burden not met by the plaintiff, and because courts generally defer to prison administration.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-10-13
The court denied plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, finding they failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on their trademark infringement claim or a clear showing for their breach of contract claims, and also failed to show irreparable harm due to their delay.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-12
The court held that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, a necessary element for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-08
The court held that a motion for preliminary injunction must comply with local rules and that the plaintiff failed to establish irreparable harm due to significant delay.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2021-09-27
The court held that the prisoner's motion for injunctive relief must be denied and the case dismissed because he is a "three-striker" under the PLRA and failed to demonstrate imminent danger or pay the filing fee.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction because it failed to comply with procedural rules and substantive requirements for injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-28
The court held that Castellano failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm, thus denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order because the relief sought was outside the scope of the underlying action and sought against non-parties.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2021-06-30
The court held that certain provisions of Florida's social media law are likely preempted by federal law (47 U.S.C. § 230) or violate the First Amendment, warranting a preliminary injunction against their enforcement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-06-23
A white Florida farmer challenged Section 1005 of the American Rescue Plan Act, which provides debt relief to socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers (SDFRs) defined by race, claiming the race-based relief violates his equal protection rights under the Fifth Amendment. The di
-
The court held that a motion to dismiss Count Four for failure to state a claim for preliminary injunction was improper, as Count Four stated a claim for declaratory judgment.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-05-18
The court held that Florida failed to establish standing to seek a preliminary injunction against federal immigration enforcement policies, as its claimed injuries were speculative and not concrete.
-
The court held that the BOP correctly calculated the petitioner's sentences to run consecutively and that challenges to the validity of the sentence revocation must be brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, not § 2241.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-04-27
The court held that the petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and request for a preliminary injunction were without merit.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-04-14
A temporary restraining order is appropriate under the Lanham Act when a trademark owner demonstrates a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its infringement claim, irreparable injury absent immediate relief, that the threatened injury outweighs harm to the defendan
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-03-22
The court held that the town's ordinance banning portable signs is a content-neutral regulation that does not violate the First Amendment or the Equal Protection Clause, and thus denied the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-01-29
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting in part the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and overruling the defendant's objections.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-26
The court held that the Church has established a substantial likelihood of prevailing on its RLUIPA substantial burden claim, warranting preliminary injunctive relief.
-
A motion for a traditional injunction must be predicated upon a cause of action, and the plaintiff must demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-12-10
The district court held it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to review the petitioner's challenge to a final order of removal, as such review is exclusively vested in the court of appeals.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-11-06
The court held that the plaintiffs' significant delay in seeking a preliminary injunction undermined their claim of irreparable harm, leading to the denial of their motion.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2020-10-09
The court found that the Secretary of State's failure to maintain a functional voter registration website and her subsequent limited deadline extension, with insufficient notice, likely violated constitutional rights. The court also determined that the organizational plaintiffs h
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-10-02
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, finding they met the requirements for such relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-09-30
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a plausible claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and that his motion for preliminary injunction was also deficient.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-09-22
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish irreparable harm, both due to their significant delay in seeking injunctive relief and their lack of corroborating evidence for claimed injuries.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-09-08
Veterinary Orthopedic Implants, Inc. sued its former employee Matthew Haas for breaching a non-compete agreement after he accepted employment with direct competitor Arthrex, Inc., shortly following his termination from VOI. The court granted a preliminary injunction, finding VOI
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-08-21
The court held that the plaintiffs were unlikely to succeed on the merits of their claims for preliminary injunction, as the Governor's executive orders were a rational response to a public health emergency and did not violate equal protection or due process rights.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-08-19
The court held that Petitioners failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for their Administrative Procedure Act claim, and thus denied their motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that it lacks jurisdiction to order home confinement or make recommendations for it, and that the petitioner's procedural due process claim is moot due to his transfer.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-08-05
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the moving party failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, which is a necessary prerequisite for such relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-07-24
The court held that the plaintiff inmate is likely to succeed on his RLUIPA claim and granted a preliminary injunction allowing him to grow a fist-length beard.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2020-07-09
City Walk – Urban Mission Inc. sought a preliminary injunction challenging Wakulla County's two-adult occupancy limitation on its three-bedroom religious transition home, which the county imposed through amendments to its Land Use Development Code after neighbors objected to resi
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-07-09
The court held that it lacked authority to grant compassionate release and that the plaintiff failed to establish the necessary elements for injunctive relief.