798 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 306 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-11-13
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a plausible claim for false arrest or denial of medical care, and also failed to meet the requirements for injunctive relief.
-
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and a substantial threat of irreparable injury.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2024-09-18
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissing claims against certain defendants for improper joinder, recommending remand.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-08-30
The court held that a plaintiff must establish a substantial threat of irreparable injury to obtain a preliminary injunction, and that economic harm and reputational damage from termination are not considered irreparable.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2024-08-30
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial threat of irreparable injury, which is a prerequisite for preliminary injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-08-26
The court granted in part the motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining two former employees from soliciting or serving the plaintiff's customers and from soliciting or hiring former employees, based on their breach of restrictive covenants.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-08-23
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for its trademark infringement claims, and therefore denied the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-08-15
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and stay, enjoining the FTC from enforcing its non-compete clause rule against the plaintiff.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-07-24
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-07-22
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish entitlement to a preliminary injunction because the alleged harm was speculative and the balance of hardships did not favor the plaintiff.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-07-12
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for sanctions without prejudice because it failed to comply with the procedural and substantive requirements for a preliminary injunction or sanctions.
-
The court held that the pro se plaintiff's complaint failed to state a claim and must be dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend to pursue claims arising from his time in the Pinellas County jail.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-07-09
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its First Amendment challenge to the county's closing time ordinance.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-07-01
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and showed undue delay in seeking relief.
-
The court held that a preliminary injunction should not be granted because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable injury, despite the application of Puerto Rico's Law 75.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-05-20
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction because they failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the defendants' motion to determine no irreparable harm before a preliminary injunction hearing.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-03-29
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction and granting Defendants' motion to dismiss Count IV (RFA claim) with leave to replead.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-03-08
A temporary restraining order is denied because the plaintiff failed to clearly establish irreparable harm and that the order would not disserve the public interest.
-
The court held that a prisoner's motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order was denied because it was not supported by a civil action, and the prisoner failed to file a complaint or pay the filing fee.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-02-21
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and order restraining transfer of assets.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2024-01-31
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of establishing standing for a preliminary injunction because the asserted injuries were speculative and not imminent.
-
The court held that the complaint must be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff failed to adequately invoke federal question or diversity jurisdiction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-12-14
The court recommended extending the temporary restraining order and approving an agreement between the temporary receiver and certain defendants.
-
87 F.4th 1292·
11th Cir.·
2023-12-06
Charles Baldwin, a former manager for Express Oil Change franchises who received nearly $2 million in a sale of business assets, challenged a restrictive covenant limiting his ability to compete as unreasonable under Georgia law. The Eleventh Circuit held that the covenant's geog
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-11-22
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction because the balance of harm weighed against granting the relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-11-18
The court affirmed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, adopting its findings and granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for injunction because it failed to meet the procedural requirements of the Federal Rules and Local Rules.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-11-14
The court held that Spimerica failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, a necessary element for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-10-04
The court held that the non-solicitation clause in the operating agreement unambiguously restricts the defendant from soliciting any of the plaintiff's current or prospective clients, and that the restrictive covenants are valid under Florida law.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-09-19
The court affirmed the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the motion for a preliminary injunction, finding the plaintiff failed to meet the required legal standards.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-09-15
The court denied plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction and writ of replevin, and granted in part and denied in part plaintiffs' motion to dismiss defendants' counterclaims, affirming the magistrate judge's report.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-09-12
The court held that the plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction was moot because he had been transferred to a different facility, and therefore denied the motion and the related motion to shorten discovery deadlines.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-09-07
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and order restraining assets.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-08-16
The court held that Odyssey demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on its breach of contract claim and granted a limited preliminary injunction requiring Olin to supply a specified amount of bleach through October 2023.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-07-27
The court held that the plaintiff's complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim, and his motions for injunctive relief were denied.
-
The court accepted and adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting in part and denying in part the Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order because it was procedurally deficient and sought relief unrelated to the operative complaint.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2023-07-03
A federal district court blocked Florida from enforcing two provisions of a law regulating third-party voter registration organizations: a requirement that only U.S. citizens can collect voter registration applications, and a ban on retaining voter information, finding both viola
-
N.D. Fla.·
2023-07-03
The citizenship requirement in section 97.0575(1)(f) violates the Equal Protection Clause because it facially discriminates against all noncitizens based on alienage and fails strict scrutiny; the state's asserted interests in timeliness and voter integrity lack evidentiary suppo
-
A party's motion to file documents under seal is denied when the party fails to make a particularized showing of good cause beyond generalized claims of competitive harm or reliance on a confidentiality agreement.
-
The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-04-07
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from selling infringing goods and requiring third parties to freeze associated funds.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-03-08
The court held that Oppenheimer failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable injury, and the balance of harms weighed against granting the injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-02-17
The court held that plaintiffs have established a substantial likelihood of success on their Title IX claim and will suffer irreparable harm, warranting a preliminary injunction.
-
11th Cir.·
2022-12-17
The Eleventh Circuit held that the students' claim was not moot and that the district court erred by misconstruing the scope of the program at issue and failing to consider the students' unjustified isolation theory.
-
52 F.4th 907·
11th Cir.·
2022-11-03
The Eleventh Circuit held that the case is moot because the underlying state proceedings have concluded, and the appellant prevailed at each stage, rendering the requested federal relief meaningless.
-
11th Cir.·
2022-10-05
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to show that Georgia's print date for paper backup voter lists imposed a severe burden on the right to vote, and thus the State's administrative concerns justified the current policy. The court dismissed the appeal regarding scanner setti
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-10-04
The court held that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, a necessary element for a preliminary injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-09-28
The court granted the ex parte application for a temporary restraining order, finding the petitioner demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, a favorable balance of hardships, and that the order would serve the public interest.