798 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 306 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
11th Cir.·
2025-12-04
The court held that the district court abused its discretion by denying a preliminary injunction, finding the plaintiffs likely to succeed on their First Amendment challenge to the ordinance.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-12-01
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction, finding the plaintiff did not establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits regarding the city's time, place, and manner restrictions on protest.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-26
A party seeking injunctive relief must establish four specific prerequisites, and failure to plead any one is fatal to the request.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-19
A preliminary injunction was denied because the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm. The court found that the contract language permitted termination at any time for any reason, and most claims appeared remediable th
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-19
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-19
The court held that the arbitration agreement is enforceable and the case should be stayed pending arbitration, as the plaintiff failed to demonstrate unconscionability or that equitable carve-out provisions precluded arbitration.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-11-14
The court held that the plaintiff's claim for declaratory relief was a disguised breach of contract claim, subject to arbitration, and that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate grounds for a preliminary injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-11-14
The court granted Plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction, enjoining Defendants from using the DESIGNICE trademark on infringing products and restraining their assets.
-
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order because the movant failed to satisfy the procedural requirements, specifically regarding notice to the opposing party.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-11-11
The court held that a party seeking only money damages cannot obtain a preliminary injunction or stay to preserve funds in the court registry solely to ensure satisfaction of a potential future judgment.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-11-10
The Anti-Injunction Act bars federal courts from enjoining state court proceedings unless specific exceptions apply, and neither the FHA nor the ADA provide such an exception for this case.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-07
The court granted in part Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, finding sufficient grounds for ex parte relief due to the risk of irreparable harm from the potential disclosure of trade secrets and confidential information.
-
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the underlying complaint was insufficient to state a claim.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-03
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable injury.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-29
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits because he did not show his Minnesota sex offender designation was removed by a court order stating such removal.
-
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or a substantial threat of irreparable injury, thus denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
A prisoner's motion for a preliminary injunction was denied because he failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or a substantial threat of irreparable injury.
-
In a trademark dispute, the court denied defendants' motion for expedited discovery to depose eight witnesses who submitted declarations in support of plaintiff's pending motion for preliminary injunction. The court found that defendants would have adequate opportunity to cross-e
-
The court denied the petitioner's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, finding he was unlikely to succeed on the merits and that injunctive relief was not in the public interest.
-
The court denied Defendants' motion for an extension of time to answer and denied their motion to stay Plaintiff's preliminary injunction motion, but granted a limited extension for Defendants to respond to the injunction motion.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-04
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and sought relief outside the scope of his amended complaint, thus denying his motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice because the plaintiff failed to meet the required legal standards.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's pro se prisoner civil rights complaint was dismissed without prejudice due to failure to pay the filing fee, use the required form, and adequately state claims or request injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-16
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm, thus denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-08
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to dismiss the Amended Complaint as a shotgun pleading and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and denied the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and his complaint are denied and dismissed, respectively, without prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-30
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and denied her motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-29
The court held that the student failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for his First Amendment claims regarding graduation attire.
-
The court recommended transferring the case to the District of Arizona because it is a more convenient forum, as a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred there and the Northern District of Florida lacks personal jurisdiction over the City of Phoenix.
-
The court denied the petitioner's motions for a stay of removal, temporary restraining order, and notification to USCIS.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-12
The court held that the termination of the plaintiff's SEVIS status was likely arbitrary and capricious, violating the APA and Due Process Clause, and granted a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-23
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiffs failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for any of their claims.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-04-18
The court recommended granting the motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiffs demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of their trademark infringement claims, irreparable injury, a favorable balance of harms, and that the injunction serves th
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish entitlement to preliminary injunctive relief, denying his motion for release from wing restriction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-08
The court held that a preliminary injunction is warranted because the plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its breach of contract claim, irreparable injury, and that the balance of harms and public interest favored the injunction.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-03-28
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for a preliminary injunction because he did not allege sufficient facts to show the private towing company acted under color of state law.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-03-25
The court recommends granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff has demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its trademark infringement claims and will suffer irreparable injury if relief is not granted.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-24
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and sought relief beyond preserving the status quo.
-
Plaintiff Raymond Alex Myer, an involuntarily committed resident of the Florida Civil Commitment Center, sought a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against six FCCC officers, alleging they assaulted him. The court denied the motion, finding that Myer failed t
-
A seller of a restaurant failed to disclose unpaid sales and use taxes to the buyer. The buyer obtained a preliminary injunction freezing the seller's assets to prevent her alleged flight to Venezuela. The appellate court reversed, holding that a monetary judgment for breach of c
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-02-14
The court granted the plaintiff's motion to convert a temporary restraining order into a preliminary injunction, finding that all four factors for injunctive relief weighed in the plaintiff's favor.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-01-31
The court recommended denying the plaintiffs' emergency motion for a preliminary injunction because they failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or a substantial threat of actual and imminent irreparable injury.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-01-30
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the requested relief was against a non-party and the plaintiff failed to meet the necessary legal standards.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-01-08
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the defendant agreed not to terminate the plaintiff's designation and the plaintiff is now compliant with fee obligations, rendering the request moot.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-12-30
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of her Administrative Procedure Act claim, thus denying her motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-12-27
The court denied the plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction because they failed to meet the required legal standard and procedural rules.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-12-16
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state an Eighth Amendment claim against the medical defendant and denied his request for injunctive relief.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction was denied because it failed to comply with local rules regarding factual support and legal argument.
-
The court granted the defendants' motion to deny the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction as moot and for failure to comply with local rules.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits of his Eighth Amendment claim.