798 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 306 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court held that the plaintiff (FAU) is substantially likely to succeed on its claim that the defendant (Parsont) violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) by intentionally accessing FAU's protected computer system without authorization or exceeding authorized access.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to carry her burden in seeking a preliminary injunction and did not use the proper forms for a civil rights action.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-05-04
The court held that a petition to dissolve an immediate suspension order must be treated as a motion for preliminary injunction and denied the petition for procedural impropriety.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-05-01
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report, granting Monster's motion for a preliminary injunction because VPX's purchase of the 'REIGN' trademark was likely an invalid assignment in gross, meaning Monster, as the first user, likely owns the mark.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-04-30
The court held that the conditions at the detention centers violated detainees' Fifth and Eighth Amendment rights, and that injunctive relief was appropriate, but the specific remedy of release required further evaluation.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-04-27
The court held that the plaintiff (RJFS) failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits in proving that the defendants were not 'customers' or that the broker was not an 'associated person' under FINRA Rule 12200, thus denying the motion for preliminary i
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-04-20
The court held that an alien admitted under the Visa Waiver Program who overstays their authorized period and applies for adjustment of status after expiration waives their right to contest removal, precluding a preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that it lacks jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) to review a claim seeking to enjoin the execution of removal orders, even when related to pending provisional waiver applications.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-03-17
The court held that the plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for breach of contract regarding the return of information and providing services to former clients, but not for trade secret violations.
-
The court held that a request for an injunction to stay a state foreclosure sale was denied because the plaintiff failed to meet procedural requirements and demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits, and because the Anti-Injunction Act barred such relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-02-28
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the dispute likely arose in connection with the business activities of the associated person and that the definition of 'customer' under FINRA rules is broad.
-
The court denied plaintiffs' motions for a deposition to perpetuate testimony and for an injunction pending appeal, and granted sanctions in part against plaintiffs' counsel.
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2020-01-31
The appellate court reversed a Department of Health order that approved a hospital's application to become a Level II trauma center. The court found that the Department erred by applying an outdated statute, as intervening amendments to the law required the application to be deni
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-11-23
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for his First and Fourteenth Amendment claims, thus denying his motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-11-13
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet its burden of persuasion for a preliminary injunction because it did not provide sufficient evidence that the restrictive covenants were reasonably necessary to protect its legitimate business interests.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-11-05
The court held that ActivEngage failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable injury, thus denying its motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-10-29
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) and lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the state-law claims, thus dismissing the amended complaint.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2019-10-18
Florida voters amended the state constitution in 2018 to automatically restore voting rights to most felons "upon completion of all terms of sentence including parole or probation," but the Florida Legislature enacted a statute implementing this amendment to require payment of fi
-
S.D. Fla.·
2019-10-16
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding they failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits regarding trade dress distinctiveness, non-functionality, and likelihood of confusion.
-
The court held that while 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c) mandates detention, prolonged detention without a bond hearing can violate the Due Process Clause.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-09-11
The court denied the motion for preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, as the contracts did not unambiguously assign the defendants' rights of publicity.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2019-08-21
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits regarding its Contracts Clause claim, as the statute, while impairing contracts, served a significant and legitimate public purpose.
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2018-07-26
A preliminary injunction must be reversed where the movant fails to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, as binding precedent establishes that a judicial vacancy occurring before the commencement of the election process must be filled by gubernatorial appo
-
Del. Ch.·
2017-06-16
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a reasonable probability of success on the merits or a threat of irreparable injury. The court interpreted the "Transfer Restriction" in the investment agreement to apply on
-
M.D. Fla.·
2015-08-19
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its trademark infringement claim and failed to demonstrate irreparable injury, thus denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2014-10-03
The court denied Marlow Marine Sales' motion for a preliminary injunction to stop arbitration proceedings in London, finding it unlikely to prevail on the merits and unlikely to suffer irreparable harm.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2014-03-06
The court held that the Alliance likely would not succeed on its Equal Access Act claim due to Florida's lack of a statutory definition for 'secondary school,' and that the school's rejection of the Alliance's club application was likely permissible under the Hazelwood standard f
-
142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2847·
M.D. Fla.·
2014-02-06
-
822 F. Supp. 2d 1125·
S.D. Fla.·
2013-08-19
A surety is entitled to a preliminary injunction compelling an indemnitor to deposit collateral when the surety establishes a reserve account for potential liability under a bond and the indemnitor refuses to deposit the collateral as required by their indemnity agreement.
-
577 F. Supp. 2d 724·
S.D. Fla.·
2013-06-04
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits for their vagueness claim and did not demonstrate irreparable injury, thus denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
1991 WL 87216·
S.D. Fla.·
2013-05-28
-
Del. Ch.·
2013-05-21
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that while a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits of the Revlon claim existed due to a flawed sales process, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the balance of equities favored injunctive
-
1990 WL 108330·
S.D. Fla.·
2013-03-18
The court granted a preliminary injunction against the defendant's former product label due to a high likelihood of consumer confusion, but denied injunctions related to the new label, the use of specific words, evidence destruction, and document production.
-
521 F. Supp. 2d 895·
S.D. Fla.·
2013-02-25
The court held that equitable tolling does not apply because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate any fault or inequitable conduct by the defendant that prevented a timely federal filing.
-
The court held that the program to remove non-citizens from voter rolls is not subject to the 90-day provision of the NVRA, as that provision applies only to removals based on a change of residence.
-
262 F. Supp. 2d 1025·
M.D. Fla.·
2012-09-24
The court held that the plaintiffs have not shown a substantial likelihood of success on their claim that Florida's 2011 early voting law amendments violate the Voting Rights Act or the Constitution, and thus denied their motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
Del. Ch.·
2012-02-29
The Court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits of their claims regarding an unfair price, a flawed sales process, and misleading disclosures. The Court conclu
-
The Court of Chancery has original and exclusive jurisdiction over the in rem proceedings of an insurance rehabilitation, but not over all claims brought against the insurer during rehabilitation. Therefore, the court may, in its discretion, require a receiver to submit to arbitr
-
783 F. Supp. 2d 1197·
M.D. Fla.·
2011-05-06
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of their constitutional challenges to the ordinance banning simulated gambling devices, and thus their motions for preliminary injunction must be denied.
-
Del. Ch.·
2011-04-11
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, finding they failed to demonstrate a reasonable probability of success on the merits of their price, process, or disclosure claims. Consequently, the court also found no irreparable harm and that the balance of
-
The court held that plaintiffs are likely to prevail on their claim that Florida law unconstitutionally prohibits spending contributions received and fully disclosed within five days before an election, but are unlikely to prevail on claims challenging disclosure of contributors,
-
Del. Ch.·
2010-10-05
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that they were unlikely to succeed on the merits of their claims. The court determined that the target's board of directors acted reasonably in conducting the sales process, negotiating the merger agree
-
768 F. Supp. 2d 1180·
M.D. Fla.·
2010-06-11
The seller of a pre-construction condominium unit appeals a trial court's summary judgment for the buyer, arguing the sales contract was authorized under the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (ILSFDA) and not subject to revocation.
-
The court held that a preliminary injunction should be granted to prevent Procon from blocking NAL's access to its tracking website for GPS units already purchased by NAL or its dealers, without requiring NAL to accept new terms that limit its claims.
-
645 F. Supp. 2d 1158·
S.D. Fla.·
2009-07-28
The court held that the transfer of a business includes the transfer of associated trademarks unless expressly stated otherwise, and granted a preliminary injunction against defendants for infringing on the plaintiff's trademarks.
-
632 F. Supp. 2d 1085·
M.D. Fla.·
2009-04-15
The court held that the school's practice and scheduled performance of a song with religious lyrics violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, warranting a preliminary injunction.
-
602 F. Supp. 2d 1233·
M.D. Fla.·
2009-03-11
The court held that the school board violated the Equal Access Act by denying recognition to the Gay-Straight Alliance based on its name, and granted a preliminary injunction.
-
Del. Ch.·
2008-12-18
The Court of Chancery denied the trustee's petition for instructions and injunctive relief, finding that the trustee had not demonstrated an imminent threat of irreparable harm and that granting the relief would conflict with orders from a Pennsylvania court, undermining principl
-
Del. Ch.·
2008-06-27
The Court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction on most claims, finding no reasonable probability of success on the merits regarding the sale process and the alleged favoritism of Apax. However, the Court granted the injunction regarding disclosure claims rel
-
Del. Ch.·
2007-07-06
The Court denied plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, finding they failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits of their claims for wrongful coercion, inadequate disclosure, and improper extraction of value by a controlling shareholder. The C