757 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 75 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-03-02
The court granted the plaintiff's motions for default judgment, permanent injunction, restitution, and civil monetary penalties against defendants The Alista Group, LLC and Luis M. Pineda Palacios.
-
The court held that statutory damages should be calculated per infringing mark per type of good, awarding $2,000,000.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-29
The court denied defendants' motions to amend judgment and for a stay pending appeal, and granted the Receiver's motion for possession of the homestead property due to defendants' continued non-compliance with prior orders.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-01-25
Volkswagen Group of America and Audi AG sued Varona and Verotec Wheels for selling counterfeit Audi wheels on eBay that infringed Audi's trademarks and design patent. The court granted summary judgment for Plaintiffs on all four counts of trademark infringement, false designation
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-06
A digital advertising business owner challenged a city ordinance prohibiting signs on waterways, arguing it violated the First Amendment by granting city officials unbridled discretion to grant exemptions without objective criteria. The court ruled that the ordinance was an uncon
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-06
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting default judgment and awarding damages and attorney's fees.
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2020-12-30
All seven amendments to the master declaration were reasonable and enforceable. The amendments to sections 1.1.26 and 10.13 regarding commercial use restrictions, section 5.1 regarding general rule applicability, section 7.2 regarding assessments, section 10.6 regarding animal re
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-12-07
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, granting the plaintiff's motions for final default judgment, permanent injunction, and damages.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-11-23
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for default final judgment and will enter a permanent injunction against the defendant.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-10-21
The court entered a Stipulated Final Permanent Injunction Order, resolving all disputes between Wyndham and the Defendants. The injunction permanently restrains and enjoins the Defendants from engaging in various advertising, marketing, and trade practices related to timeshare in
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-10-20
The court held that Casino was not entitled to attorney's fees under either federal or state law because it was not the prevailing party, as the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case after achieving the injunctive relief it sought.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-09-16
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, granting default judgment against certain defendants and ordering disgorgement and permanent injunctions related to tax return preparation.
-
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the moving party failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, which is a necessary prerequisite for such relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-07-28
The court held that the defendant's distribution of brochures for an amusement ride confusingly similar to the plaintiff's patented ride constituted a Lanham Act violation, entitling the plaintiff to summary judgment and a permanent injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-06-16
The court granted the SEC's motion for permanent injunctions and other relief against defendants Diane Harrison and Michael Daniels, based on their consent to the entry of judgment.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-06-04
The court denied the motion for default judgment because the plaintiffs failed to establish a sufficient basis for personal jurisdiction over the defendant.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-06-03
This case consolidates two appeals concerning the maintenance and development of condominium community property. The court affirmed the trial court's decisions regarding maintenance assessments and the interpretation of development agreements, finding no abuse of discretion or re
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-05-13
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding compensatory and exemplary damages and issuing a permanent injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-04-21
Wilbert R. Hurst, an inmate, sued several Florida Department of Corrections officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of his due process rights, First Amendment retaliation, equal protection, deliberate indifference to medical needs, and intentional infliction of emot
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-04-21
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, awarding statutory damages, costs, and a permanent injunction against defendants for copyright infringement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-04-13
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant the FTC's motion for default judgment and permanent injunction against the MOBE Corporate Defendants.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-04-03
The court granted default judgment on liability for defamation but denied the request for a permanent injunction, ordering an evidentiary hearing for damages.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-04-02
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, awarding statutory damages and a permanent injunction.
-
The district court dismissed the plaintiffs' complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because they failed to exhaust administrative remedies and did not seek review in the appropriate court of appeals.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-02-10
The court granted summary judgment for the United States, issuing a permanent injunction against Roland V. Askins III to compel compliance with employment tax obligations due to his history of non-compliance.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-01-29
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, granting in part and denying in part the plaintiff's motion for default judgment and permanent injunction.
-
Del. Ch.·
2019-12-30
The court granted Gulf's motion for judgment on the pleadings regarding Eni's negligent misrepresentation claim in the second arbitration, finding it to be an impermissible collateral attack on the prior arbitration award. However, the court denied Gulf's motion concerning Eni's
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-10-29
The court held that the plaintiff, as a disinterested stakeholder, had a reasonable fear of vexatious litigation due to conflicting claims on an escrow fund, thus satisfying the requirements for statutory interpleader.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-10-21
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, entering default judgment, a permanent injunction, and awarding statutory damages and attorney's fees.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-10-09
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant default judgment, award damages, and issue a permanent injunction for trademark infringement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-10-04
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant in part and deny in part the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, entering a permanent injunction and monetary judgment against Allied Markets, LLC.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-09-17
The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation to enter default judgment and a permanent injunction against MAR LLC, but modified the injunction to be more specific.
-
The Court of Chancery lacks jurisdiction to enjoin future defamatory speech, as such claims are traditionally reserved for courts of law. While a "trade libel" exception exists where defamation is incidental to a separate business tort, the plaintiff's claim here focuses primaril
-
Del. Ch.·
2019-08-08
The Court held that the deed language granted an express easement appurtenant for driveway purposes. The scope of this easement was found to be ambiguous and, considering extrinsic evidence, was interpreted to include parking cars, setting out trash for pickup, and recreational u
-
274 So. 3d 1238·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2019-06-28
A trial court's issuance of a three-year injunction against domestic violence is affirmed when supported by competent, substantial evidence including testimony regarding current incidents and historical domestic violence.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2019-06-26
The appellate court affirmed a conviction for violating an injunction for protection against stalking. The court held that the temporary injunction remained in effect until the permanent injunction was served, even though the permanent injunction was entered after a hearing Garci
-
125 La. 371·
M.D. Fla.·
2019-05-10
Plaintiffs failed to meet their burden of proving that their disgorgement figure reasonably approximates the defendants' unjust gains, and therefore are not entitled to monetary relief.
-
250 So. 3d 94·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2018-06-13
Premier Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. successfully obtained a permanent injunction against employee Eric Larson for violating a non-compete agreement and subsequently moved for attorney's fees under the employment contract's Paragraph 12. The trial court denied the fees, reasoning t
-
236 So. 3d 498·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2018-01-26
A trial court does not abuse its discretion by denying a stay of civil injunction proceedings based on Fifth Amendment concerns when a related criminal case is pending, as no constitutional requirement mandates such a stay absent special circumstances.
-
Del. Ch.·
2017-07-12
The Court granted summary judgment for the plaintiffs, finding that two members of the Sussex County Council cast votes on a rezoning application that were either inadequately supported by the record or arbitrary and capricious. Consequently, the rezoning application must be re-s
-
Del. Ch.·
2016-07-11
The Court of Chancery should grant injunctive relief to Ambient Heating and Cooling, LLC (Ambient LLC) against Ambient, finding that Ambient's use of the name "Ambient" infringes on Ambient LLC's common law trademark rights and violates Delaware's Deceptive Trade Practices Act. T
-
Del. Ch.·
2015-10-30
The Delaware Court of Chancery held that Tidel breached an enforceable non-competition provision in the Securities Purchase Agreement by developing and marketing the R50 cash management system with specifications and pricing above the agreed-upon threshold during the restricted p
-
Del. Ch.·
2015-07-14
The Court of Chancery has subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiffs' claims seeking to enjoin the requirement that they wear GPS monitor ankle bracelets and declare the governing statute unconstitutional. The court found that the plaintiffs' primary relief sought was equita
-
2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174135·
M.D. Fla.·
2014-12-17
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting default judgment for injunctive relief against defendants for violating the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.
-
Del. Ch.·
2014-11-17
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's request for a permanent injunction to remove the defendant's barn, finding that the relevant restrictive covenant was too vague and imprecise to be enforceable. The court also denied the plaintiff's request for specific performance of
-
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery's denial of North River's request for a permanent injunction. The Court held that North River failed to demonstrate that the equities weighed in its favor, as the requested injunction would not fully remedy the risk of inc
-
Del. Ch.·
2014-07-28
The court held that the defendants breached the Right of First Offer (ROFO) Agreement by failing to provide a compliant "Property Offer Notice" before proceeding with negotiations and agreements with a third party, Rockrose. The notice failed to accurately state the sale price, o
-
The court held that a plaintiff need not prove a prescribing physician would have acted differently, only that a different warning might have altered patient behavior, and that collateral source payments must be deducted from medical expense awards.
-
822 F. Supp. 2d 1125·
S.D. Fla.·
2013-08-19
A surety is entitled to a preliminary injunction compelling an indemnitor to deposit collateral when the surety establishes a reserve account for potential liability under a bond and the indemnitor refuses to deposit the collateral as required by their indemnity agreement.
-
810 F. Supp. 2d 771·
S.D. Fla.·
2013-06-28
The court held that the plaintiff, a "three-striker" under the PLRA, failed to demonstrate he was in imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time of filing his complaint, thus he could not proceed in forma pauperis.