-
580 F.2d 521·
D.C. Cir.·
1978-03-30
·cited 76×
The court held that the District Court's order was clearly erroneous because it was based on speculation and conjecture regarding the new jail's conditions and capacity, rather than substantial evidence.
-
621 F.2d 269·
8th Cir.·
1980-03-13
·cited 37×
The court held that the Army Corps of Engineers' issuance of a permit to cross the Missouri River was not a "major federal action" requiring an Environmental Impact Statement under NEPA, and the Tribe failed to raise substantial environmental issues.
-
293 F.2d 585·
7th Cir.·
1961-08-21
·cited 36×
A municipal ordinance prohibiting solicitation of funds for charitable purposes without prior consent of the City Council, which lacks standards for granting or withholding permits and exempts a specific organization, is an unconstitutional prior restraint on free speech and viol
-
821 So. 2d 311·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2002-05-03
·cited 24×
Knox appealed the denial of her request for a temporary injunction against the Brevard County School Board, claiming that closed interviews for a middle school principal position violated Florida's Sunshine Law. The court affirmed the denial, holding that the interview team serve
-
240 F.2d 109·
9th Cir.·
1956-12-20
·cited 18×
The court held that the district court erred in denying a hearing where a genuine issue of fact existed regarding the legality of evidence seizure, and that the appeal was not moot.
-
842 F.2d 37·
2d Cir.·
1988-03-17
·cited 14×
The court held that abstention is appropriate under the Younger doctrine because there is an ongoing state administrative proceeding involving important state interests, and the plaintiff has an adequate opportunity for judicial review of its constitutional claims.
-
607 F.2d 274·
9th Cir.·
1979-10-24
·cited 9×
The court held that 12 U.S.C. § 36(c), which incorporates state law restrictions, applies to the relocation of national bank branches, not just the establishment of new ones.
-
893 F.2d 1012·
9th Cir.·
1990-01-11
·cited 8×
The court held that the appeal is moot because the logging activities sought to be enjoined have already occurred, and the claims for injunctive and declaratory relief cannot be effectively granted. The court also found that the 'capable of repetition, yet evading review' excepti
-
625 F. Supp. 1543·
M.D. Fla.·
1986-01-17
·cited 2×
The court denied the plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining order, finding the Volusia County ordinance prohibiting topless dancing in establishments serving alcohol to be constitutional under the Twenty-first Amendment.
-
638 F.2d 27·
5th Cir.·
1981-02-23
·cited 2×
A state statute requiring sheriffs to possess a high school diploma or its equivalent does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-12-31
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and permanent injunction, finding he failed to establish the necessary elements for such relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-03-11
The district court dismissed the plaintiffs' complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because they failed to exhaust administrative remedies and did not seek review in the appropriate court of appeals.
-
977 F.2d 287·
7th Cir.·
1992-10-05
The court held that the county ordinance is a zoning ordinance and is therefore invalid under Indiana law because the county has not adopted a comprehensive zoning plan.
-
735 F. Supp. 1040·
S.D. Fla.·
1990-04-13
Res judicata does not bar plaintiffs from challenging the county's race-conscious affirmative action plan due to significant changes in constitutional law, and a supplemental hearing is required to assess the plan's validity under current standards.