Permanent Injunctive Relief

50 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Lindquist v. Idaho State Bd. OF Corr.
  776 F.2d 851· 9th Cir.· 1985-11-15 ·cited 42×
  The court held that a constitutionally adequate law library, or adequate assistance from trained legal personnel, satisfies the inmates' right of meaningful access to the courts, and that the prison's current library and support system meet these minimum standards.
• State v. City OF Clearwater
  863 So. 2d 149· Fla.· 2003-09-11 ·cited 25×
  The Florida Supreme Court held that personal or private emails transmitted or received by public employees on government-owned computer systems are not public records under Florida law merely by virtue of their placement on a government computer. The court rejected arguments that
• Special Purpose Accounts Receivable Coop. Corp. v. Prime One Cap. Co.
  125 F. Supp. 2d 1093· S.D. Fla.· 2000-12-19 ·cited 25×
  The court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, finding genuine issues of material fact regarding conversion claims.
• Centel Cable Television Co. OF Fla. v. Thos. J. White Dev. Corp.
  902 F.2d 905· 11th Cir.· 1990-06-05 ·cited 25×
  Cable companies have an implied right of action under section 621(a) of the Cable Act against private developers who block construction of cable systems through easements dedicated to compatible uses, and this enforcement does not violate the fifth amendment takings clause.
• Tiramisu Intertional LLC v. Clever Imports LLC
  741 F. Supp. 2d 1279· S.D. Fla.· 2010-08-11 ·cited 19×
  The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting in part and denying in part the plaintiff's motion for permanent injunctive relief, damages, and attorney fees, based on a default judgment for trademark infringement.
• Sharpe v. Harris
  621 F.2d 530· 2d Cir.· 1980-05-15 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the district court did not err in imposing time limits for hearings, decisions, and payments for SSI applicants, nor in ordering interim payments for delays.
• Bd. OF Trs. OF THE Internal Improvement Tr. Fund v. Walker Ranch Gen. P'ship
  496 So. 2d 153· Fla. 5th DCA· 1986-08-21 ·cited 10×
  The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal resolved a jurisdictional boundary dispute between Polk and Osceola Counties regarding Lake Hatchineha. The court held that the ordinary high water line at 52.5 feet mean sea level, not the midpoint between high and low water marks as th
• Minty v. Meister Fin. Grp., Inc.
  132 So. 3d 373· Fla. 4th DCA· 2014-02-12 ·cited 6×
  On remand from a prior appeal, the Fourth District reversed the circuit court's order disbursing funds held in the court registry to the lender, finding that the modification of the temporary injunction effectively granted permanent relief without a trial on the borrower's inextr
• Avalon Legal Info. Servs., Inc. v. Keating
  110 So. 3d 75· Fla. 5th DCA· 2013-03-08 ·cited 6×
  Avalon Legal Information Services and Judy Schneider appealed a temporary injunction enjoining them from violating a non-compete/non-solicitation covenant in favor of Gerard Keating. The court affirmed the injunction and bond amount but remanded for modification of the injunction
• McLENDON v. Cont'l CAN Co.
  908 F.2d 1171· 3d Cir.· 1990-07-26 ·cited 6×
  The court affirmed the district court's grant of nationwide injunctive relief, holding that Continental's Liability Avoidance Plan (LAP) violated ERISA section 510 and that the 'same-loss' defense was not sufficiently proven at the 73 St. Louis plant.
• Nat'l Kidney Patients Ass'n v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D.
  902 F.2d 51· D.C. Cir.· 1990-04-24 ·cited 6×
  The appeal of a preliminary injunction is moot because subsequent legislation enacted by Congress achieved the same outcome as the injunction, rendering the appellate issue non-justiciable.
• Ashraf v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc.
  200 So. 3d 173· Fla. 5th DCA· 2016-07-01 ·cited 5×
  Dr. Ashraf appealed the dismissal of his defamation claim against a hospital for reporting adverse findings to the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB). The court affirmed dismissal, holding that the two-year statute of limitations under the single publication rule bars claims
• LaROSE v. A.K.
  32 So. 3d 77· Fla. 2d DCA· 2009-07-24 ·cited 5×
  The University of Tampa and a faculty member appealed an order enforcing a temporary injunction against the university. The appellate court reversed, holding that the enforcement order improperly granted permanent injunctive relief by requiring the university to drop a course fro
• LaROSE v. A.K.
  37 So. 3d 265· Fla. 2d DCA· 2009-07-24 ·cited 5×
  A.K. sought a temporary injunction to remove an academic integrity violation and failing grade from her student file, alleging unfair plagiarism accusations by Professor LaRose and the University of Tampa. The trial court granted the temporary injunction, and this appeal affirms
• Special Purpose Accounts Receivable Coop. Corp. v. Prime One Cap. Co.
  202 F. Supp. 2d 1339· S.D. Fla.· 2002-04-16 ·cited 4×
  The court held that plaintiffs lacked standing to assert RICO claims based on mail and wire fraud predicated on misrepresentations made to third parties, as required by Eleventh Circuit precedent. However, the court found that the RICO claims related to the Prime One enterprise a
• Nazia, Inc. v. Amscot Corp.
  275 So. 3d 702· Fla. 5th DCA· 2019-05-31 ·cited 3×
  A temporary injunction was improperly granted where the licensee possessed only a revocable license to use parking spaces, was unlikely to succeed on the merits, and the injunction would alter rather than preserve the status quo by requiring restoration to a pre-construction cond
• Barnett Banks of Marion Cnty., NA v. Gallagher
  839 F. Supp. 835· M.D. Fla.· 1993-12-03 ·cited 3×
  The McCarran-Ferguson Act saves Florida Statute § 626.988 from preemption by the National Bank Act's § 92, because § 626.988 regulates the business of insurance and § 92 does not specifically relate to insurance.
• Gonzalez-Barrera v. Majorca Towers Condo
  272 So. 3d 424· Fla. 3d DCA· 2019-02-06 ·cited 2×
  Gonzalez-Barrera and Garcia appeal a permanent injunction issued against Garcia by Majorca Towers Condominium Association. The court affirmed the injunction prohibiting Garcia from residing in a separate unit from Gonzalez-Barrera without Association approval, but reversed the in
• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. RCA Credit Servs., LLC
  727 F. Supp. 2d 1320· M.D. Fla.· 2010-07-21 ·cited 2×
  The court granted summary judgment for the FTC on claims that Defendants made deceptive representations about removing negative credit information and violated CROA disclosure and fee requirements, but denied summary judgment on the claim that Defendants falsely promised to raise
• Albertson's, Inc. v. The Fla. Dep't OF Prof'l Reg.
  658 So. 2d 134· Fla. 1st DCA· 1995-07-11 ·cited 2×
  Albertson's and other chain pharmacy companies challenged section 408.706(10) of Florida's Health Care and Insurance Reform Act as violating the Commerce Clause and Equal Protection Clause. The trial court struck down the provision barring pharmacies licensed in other states but
• Craig v. Colburn
  570 F.2d 916· 10th Cir.· 1978-02-23 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the Director of the United States Marshals Service had the authority to involuntarily reassign a Chief Deputy United States Marshal under applicable statutes and regulations.
• US Commodity Futures Trading Com'n v. States
  674 F. Supp. 2d 1311· S.D. Fla.· 2009-11-02 ·cited 1×
  The court granted the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's motion for default judgment, permanently enjoining Bernadette Bowden from further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and ordering her to pay restitution and a civil monetary penalty.
• Modern, Inc. v. Florida
  381 F. Supp. 2d 1331· M.D. Fla.· 2004-04-14 ·cited 1×
  The court held that inverse condemnation claims are not barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel because the administrative proceedings did not fully litigate those issues. The court also found that federal equal protection claims were not barred due to an untimely England-J
• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. FleetCor Techs., Inc.
  11th Cir.· 2026-01-06
  The Federal Trade Commission sued FleetCor Technologies, Inc. (later rebranded as Corpay) and its CEO Ronald Clarke for violating federal consumer protection laws through deceptive advertising of fuel card discounts and unauthorized fee charges. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed summ
• City of Lauderdale Lakes v. Tinisha Allen
  Fla. 4th DCA· 2025-11-12
  A trial court exceeds its jurisdiction when it sua sponte raises constitutional challenges and recalculates lien amounts that were not pleaded or argued by the parties, and a defendant waives the right to contest code enforcement fines by failing to appeal the special magistrate'
• Tolife Techs. Pty Ltd v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-10-03
  The court granted default judgment for trademark and design patent infringement, awarding permanent injunctive relief and statutory damages.
• Young Viper Gear, LLC v. DOE
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-10-18
  The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for final default judgment, awarding statutory damages and permanent injunctive relief for copyright infringement.
• MacuHealth, LP v. Vision Elements, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-08-09
  The court held that Plaintiff is entitled to permanent injunctive relief under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) and the Lanham Act, despite the jury finding no actual monetary damages.
• Foreo Inc. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-05-14
  The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendations, granting in part the plaintiff's motion for default judgment and awarding monetary damages and permanent injunctive relief.
• Bishins v. United States Sec'y of Health & Human Servs.
  M.D. Fla.· 2023-09-08
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies for his claims regarding Medicare payments and FOIA requests, thus dismissing his complaint.
• VantagePoint AI, LLC v. Doe
  M.D. Fla.· 2023-05-04
  The court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, finding the defendant liable for trademark infringement and unfair competition, awarding damages and injunctive relief.
• Sharp Shirter Inc. v. THE Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2023-04-10
  The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defaulting defendants for copyright infringement.
• Divine Designs Salon, Inc. v. Arden Thompson
  Fla. 2d DCA· 2023-02-10
  This case involved a dispute over a restrictive covenant and trade secrets. The appellate court affirmed most of the lower court's decision but reversed and remanded for a recalculation of damages due to a factual error regarding the timing of an injunction.
• McElroy v. Fla. Power & Light Co.
  Fla. 4th DCA· 2022-11-23
  The Court affirmed the conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon but reversed and remanded for the board of review to clarify the evidentiary standard it applied in evaluating the evidence, as the opinion created ambiguity about whether the board used the proper standard of
• Whirlpool Props., Inc. v. Closeout Solutions, LLC
  S.D. Fla.· 2022-06-27
  The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant default judgment and permanent injunctive relief against defendants for trademark infringement.
• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. SPM Thermo-Shield, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2022-03-21
  The court granted summary judgment for the FTC, finding that defendants made false or unsubstantiated performance claims about their architectural coatings, and that injunctive relief was appropriate due to the likelihood of future violations.
• Rosenbaum v. Cytodyn Inc.
  Del. Ch.· 2021-10-13
  The Delaware Court of Chancery held that the plaintiffs failed to comply with the company's advance notice bylaw by omitting material information regarding supporters of their nomination slate and potential conflicts of interest related to a past acquisition proposal. The court f
• Luxottica Grp. S.p.A. v. President Optical, Inc.
  S.D. Fla.· 2021-02-26
  The court held that statutory damages should be calculated per infringing mark per type of good, awarding $2,000,000.
• Preston Hollow Cap. LLC v. C.A. No. 2019-0169-SG Nuveen LLC
  Del. Ch.· 2019-08-13
  The Court of Chancery lacks jurisdiction to enjoin future defamatory speech, as such claims are traditionally reserved for courts of law. While a "trade libel" exception exists where defamation is incidental to a separate business tort, the plaintiff's claim here focuses primaril
• The N. River Ins. § Co.
  Del.· 2014-11-06
  The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery's denial of North River's request for a permanent injunction. The Court held that North River failed to demonstrate that the equities weighed in its favor, as the requested injunction would not fully remedy the risk of inc
• Guenther v. Novartis Pharm. Corp.
  849 F. Supp. 2d 1085· M.D. Fla.· 2014-02-20
  The court held that a plaintiff need not prove a prescribing physician would have acted differently, only that a different warning might have altered patient behavior, and that collateral source payments must be deducted from medical expense awards.
• Hess Corp. v. Grillasca
  27 So. 3d 684· Fla. 2d DCA· 2009-12-23
  Hess Corporation appealed the certification of a class action lawsuit filed by customers who alleged that Hess placed unauthorized holds on their bank accounts when they purchased fuel at self-service pumps using debit cards without entering a PIN. The Florida appellate court rev
• Comcast OF Fla., L.P. v. L'Ambiance Beach Condo. Ass'n, Inc.
  17 So. 3d 839· Fla. 4th DCA· 2009-08-26
  Comcast appeals a trial court judgment upholding a condominium association's termination of a cable television service agreement pursuant to Florida Statute section 718.302. The court affirms, holding that cable television service agreements providing services to unit owners as a
• Modern, Inc. v. Florida
  444 F. Supp. 2d 1234· M.D. Fla.· 2006-08-15
  The court held that the defendant is entitled to summary judgment on the common law flowage easement claim because its actions were aimed at restoring natural water flow, not interfering with it. The court also found that certain deed descriptions were too ambiguous to establish
• Mariano R. Gonzalez and Rene Gonzalez v. Flamingo Ests. Maint. Ass'n, Inc.
  874 So. 2d 1198· Fla. 4th DCA· 2004-05-12
  The Gonzalezes appealed a summary judgment granting an injunction requiring them to modify their home's exterior to comply with architectural guidelines. The court reversed the summary judgment as to the Gonzalezes' affirmative defense that the homeowners association acted arbitr
• Nelson v. Carlson
  904 F.2d 560· 10th Cir.· 1990-06-01
  A federal prisoner's motion for permanent injunctive relief based on an alleged violation of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA) must be brought in the state court where the charges are pending, not in federal court.
• Am. Health Prods. Co. v. Hayes
  744 F.2d 912· 2d Cir.· 1984-09-11
  The court affirmed the district court's holding that starchblockers are a drug under 21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(C) and affirmed the grant of injunctive relief.
• United States v. Generix Drug Corp.
  707 F.2d 835· 5th Cir.· 1983-06-16
  The court affirmed the district court's preliminary injunction, vacating its prior judgment, consistent with the Supreme Court's ruling that generic drugs require FDA approval.