639 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 169 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · browse and sort
-
268 F.3d 1014·
11th Cir.·
2001-09-26
·cited 287×
The Eleventh Circuit reversed the district court's grant of qualified immunity to the Sheriff regarding the abandonment of Owens, finding that the allegations, when reasonably inferred, suggested the deputy acted pursuant to the Sheriff's custom or policy. However, the court affi
-
769 F.2d 700·
11th Cir.·
1985-08-26
·cited 257×
The court held that the complaint sufficiently alleged a claim of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against the medical defendants and that dismissal of claims against the non-medical defendants based solely on respondeat superior was improper, reversing the distri
-
The court held that the District of Columbia and its employees can be sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3), and that certain claims against FBI defendants were barred by the statute of limitations, while others against MPD defendants and the District lacked sufficient evidence.
-
774 F.2d 1567·
11th Cir.·
1985-11-04
·cited 192×
The court affirmed the district court's judgment, holding that the conditions of confinement, including overcrowding and food service, did not violate constitutional standards, and that the plaintiff failed to prove deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.
-
The court affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiff's civil rights claims, finding that most allegations were either barred by immunity doctrines, failed to state a claim due to vagueness and conclusory nature, or were unsupported by specific facts.
-
774 F.2d 1495·
11th Cir.·
1985-10-15
·cited 178×
The existence of a state statute providing redress does not automatically insulate a wrongdoer from a federal § 1983 claim if the state remedy is not adequate in fact.
-
846 F.2d 1328·
11th Cir.·
1988-06-13
·cited 166×
Summary judgment was inappropriate because genuine issues of material fact exist regarding whether the officer used excessive force and whether the city maintained a policy or custom that led to the constitutional violation.
-
923 F.3d 947·
11th Cir.·
2019-05-09
·cited 164×
The court held that the second tasing of an incapacitated detainee constituted excessive force violating clearly established law, but supervisory liability claims failed due to lack of evidence of a policy or custom based on multiple incidents.
-
Medically vulnerable pretrial detainees at a Miami-Dade jail challenged COVID-19 conditions of confinement as violating the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, and the district court granted a preliminary injunction requiring measures including social distancing. The Eleventh Circu
-
746 F.2d 1205·
7th Cir.·
1984-09-04
·cited 145×
The court held that the district court properly admitted evidence of a conspiracy to conceal the truth and that certain civil rights claims were not time-barred.
-
704 F.2d 943·
7th Cir.·
1983-04-05
·cited 142×
A liquor license can be considered property for Fourteenth Amendment due process purposes, and the Twenty-First Amendment does not grant absolute immunity to states to restrict First Amendment expression in bars without justification. Local officials acting in judicial or legisla
-
906 F.2d 667·
11th Cir.·
1990-07-24
·cited 139×
The district court erred in failing to construe the pro se complaint liberally to include a claim against Crawford in his official capacity.
-
The court held that the plaintiff should be allowed limited discovery and an opportunity to amend his complaint to state a claim for "deliberate indifference" against the county under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and that his breach of contract claim as a third-party beneficiary should be r
-
901 F.2d 989·
11th Cir.·
1990-05-21
·cited 133×
The court held that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to the City of Fort Lauderdale on immunity grounds, vacating the judgment and remanding for consideration of constitutional issues and pendent state claims.
-
888 F.2d 783·
11th Cir.·
1989-11-17
·cited 130×
The court held that the district court correctly denied the County's motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the issue of deliberate indifference, and affirmed the judgment.
-
643 F.2d 1188·
5th Cir.·
1981-05-01
·cited 126×
Local legislators are entitled to absolute immunity under § 1983 for conduct in furtherance of their legislative duties, but municipalities are not entitled to legislative immunity from damages for uncompensated takings of private property through zoning regulations.
-
The court held that a municipality can be held liable under section 1983 for the unconstitutional actions of an appointed official if that official's acts represent official policy, even if the municipality's written policies are facially constitutional.
-
The court held that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict against the Village of Melrose Park for failure to train or supervise its officers, and reversed the conspiracy to obstruct justice conviction due to lack of an overt act. However, it affirmed the j
-
The court held that summary judgment should not be granted if the plaintiff alleges an agreement between a private party and law enforcement to violate constitutional rights, and the defendants fail to foreclose the possibility of such an agreement.
-
The court held that the Eleventh Amendment bars suits against states in federal court and that the statute of limitations had run on the civil rights claims, affirming all dismissals.
-
The court held that the district court erred in granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial, as the plaintiff presented sufficient evidence for a jury to find that his demotion was in retaliation for protected First Amendment activities.
-
The court held that it had appellate jurisdiction and that the district court properly dismissed all claims, including those barred by the statute of limitations and res judicata.
-
923 F.2d 1474·
11th Cir.·
1991-02-19
·cited 103×
The court held that the plaintiff's allegations were sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss for claims against the individual defendants based on qualified immunity and against the City for municipal liability under § 1983, and that § 1983 provides the exclusive remedy for §
-
The court held that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the jury's findings of liability and damages against the police detective, police chief, and city for constitutional violations under section 1983, and that no errors occurred requiring a new trial.
-
The court held that Section 1983 does not preclude the incorporation of state law remedies, including vicarious liability, for the deprivation of civil rights.
-
48 F.4th 1222·
11th Cir.·
2022-09-08
·cited 97×
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, holding that the plaintiff failed to sufficiently allege municipal liability under Monell because the superintendent lacked final policymaking authority and that the plaintiff failed to establish an official policy or
-
862 F.2d 1471·
11th Cir.·
1989-01-11
·cited 94×
The court held that the district court erred in applying collateral estoppel to prevent litigation of the rape's occurrence and that the sheriff and county are immune from state tort liability. However, the county may be liable under § 1983 for the sheriff's hiring policy.
-
A dismissal of criminal charges after an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal constitutes a favorable termination for purposes of a federal civil rights claim, and all claims arising from a single transaction should not be barred by state statutes of limitation.
-
The court held that the plaintiff stated claims for substantive due process violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against individual officers and the municipality, and that the district court erred in dismissing these claims.
-
838 F.2d 663·
3d Cir.·
1988-01-26
·cited 88×
The dissenting judge argues that allegations of gross negligence or deliberate indifference are insufficient to sustain a due process § 1983 claim, which requires pleading intentional action, abuse of power, or actions tantamount to intent.
-
The court held that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdicts against the individual defendants for constitutional and state law violations, but that the district court erred in exercising pendent jurisdiction over the State of Rhode Island.
-
The court held that dating is a constitutionally protected association under the First Amendment and that the award of $100,000 for procedural due process violations was grossly excessive.
-
The court held that summary judgment was improperly granted for the hospital, doctor, county, commissioners, and sheriff, as genuine issues of material fact remained regarding their liability under federal and state law. The exclusion of expert testimony was also deemed erroneous
-
649 F.2d 1193·
5th Cir.·
1981-07-10
·cited 83×
The court's opinion, which this judge concurs with, holds that a local government entity is liable under § 1983 when its official policy or custom inflicts injury, not solely for the acts of its employees or agents.
-
The dissenting judges argue that the panel decision incorrectly applies standards for municipal liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Fourteenth Amendment, particularly regarding 'failure to train' and the 'policy or custom' requirement.
-
The court held that the district court erred in dismissing governmental entity defendants and individual defendants, and in granting a directed verdict for the remaining defendants.
-
814 F.2d 277·
6th Cir.·
1987-03-18
·cited 74×
The court held that the plaintiffs' allegations of gross negligence by sheriffs in entrusting a patrol car to a convicted felon, who then murdered the plaintiff's daughter, stated a claim for deprivation of life without due process under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
-
The court held that a justice of the peace is not immune from liability for non-judicial acts, and that police officers are protected by qualified immunity based on an objective good-faith standard. The court also found that the Parratt v. Taylor doctrine does not bar claims for
-
767 F.2d 161·
5th Cir.·
1985-08-05
·cited 73×
Police officers are liable under both Texas law and the Fourteenth Amendment for recklessly using deadly force that kills an innocent third party, even when the force might have been justified against the actual suspect. A municipality is liable under § 1983 for a policy of consc
-
628 F.2d 297·
5th Cir.·
1980-09-24
·cited 73×
The court held that while appellate delay can violate due process, the county was not liable because the judge, not the commissioners' actions, was the proximate cause of the delay. Individual defendants were immune.
-
844 F.2d 714·
10th Cir.·
1988-04-07
·cited 71×
Private parties acting under a government contract are entitled to qualified immunity, and the denial of such immunity is immediately appealable, even if claims for injunctive relief remain pending.
-
660 F.2d 1007·
4th Cir.·
1981-10-07
·cited 70×
The court held that the strip search policy was unconstitutional and reversed directed verdicts for damages claims related to it, remanding for further proceedings. Other claims were affirmed.
-
53 F.4th 1274·
11th Cir.·
2022-11-14
·cited 69×
Thomas Ireland's father appealed the district court's grant of summary judgment dismissing his claims arising from his son's death following a violent altercation with corrections officers at the Charlotte County Jail on August 24, 2015. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the dismissa
-
The court held that coercing a minor to abort violates her constitutional right to privacy and that coercing minors to refrain from consulting parents violates parental rights to direct upbringing. It also held that compelling action against religious beliefs can violate free exe
-
723 F.2d 675·
9th Cir.·
1984-01-10
·cited 68×
A prosecutor is absolutely immune from damages liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for authorizing the release of evidence, as this is considered a quasi-judicial act within the scope of their authority. A supervisor cannot be held liable for a subordinate's constitutional deprivati
-
708 F.2d 647·
11th Cir.·
1983-07-01
·cited 68×
The court affirmed the dismissals of the plaintiff's claims, finding no error in the district court's rulings on procedural grounds, the scope of EEOC charges, or the application of legal standards for retaliation and discrimination.
-
Police officers are not liable for damages incurred after a district attorney files charges, unless the presumption of the prosecutor's independent judgment is rebutted. The judgment of liability is affirmed, but the damages award is vacated and remanded for a new trial.
-
750 F.2d 1039·
D.C. Cir.·
1984-12-07
·cited 65×
A private employer acting as an ad hoc federal agent, instigated by federal officials to violate constitutional rights, can be subject to Bivens liability and equitable relief like reinstatement, even if damages are available.
-
The court held that intervening Supreme Court precedent (Owen v. City of Independence) allows for compensatory damages and backpay against local government officials in their official capacities, even if they acted in good faith, for procedural due process violations. Reinstateme
-
The court held that an independent school district is amenable to suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and that a teacher's classroom expression, even if controversial, is protected speech unless it overbalances her usefulness as an instructor.