2,256 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,513 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court granted in part and denied in part the motion, issuing a temporary restraining order against defendants for trademark infringement and unfair competition.
-
The court held that the plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for breach of contract regarding the return of information and providing services to former clients, but not for trade secret violations.
-
The Eleventh Circuit denied the motion for appointment of substitute counsel and a stay of execution, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate entitlement to either due to untimeliness, futility, and unjustified delay.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-03-04
A father sought certiorari review of a trial court order removing his son from the paternal aunt's custody and placing the child in foster care. The appellate court dismissed the petition because the father failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, a jurisdictional prerequisite for
-
The court denied the plaintiff's third application for a temporary restraining order because she failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.
-
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the dispute likely arose in connection with the business activities of the associated person and that the definition of 'customer' under FINRA rules is broad.
-
The appellate court affirmed a trial court's order for a mandatory injunction. The injunction required appellants to return $19.5 million to an escrow account and prohibited further transfers, pending a determination of the appellee's ownership interest in the funds.
-
The court granted in part the wineries' motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on San Antonio Winery's trade dress infringement claim but not on Merritt Estate Winery's trademark claim.
-
A party cannot obtain a traditional injunction without asserting an independent cause of action.
-
15th Cir. Ct. App. Div.·
2020-02-19
GEICO sought certiorari review of a nonfinal order extending the time for Andy's Auto Body & Paint to accept GEICO's settlement proposal under Florida Rule 1.442. The court granted the petition, holding that an indefinite extension of time to accept a settlement proposal violates
-
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction because the evidence was in equipoise and the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm without an adequate remedy at law.
-
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for entry of final default judgment against defendants for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-02-13
The court denied Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because Plaintiff failed to meet the stringent requirements for ex parte relief and lacked proper notice to the adverse party.
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2020-01-29
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-01-29
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-01-27
The court granted Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis in the pleadings and evidence to establish Defendants' liability for trademark counterfeiting, infringement, false designation of origin, cybersquatting, and copyright infringement.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief was denied and the case was dismissed without prejudice because he failed to comply with local rules and did not file a proper complaint.
-
The court denied the motion for an injunction pending appeal because the plaintiff failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on appeal or irreparable injury.
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2019-12-31
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2019-12-18
The appellate court reviewed two discovery orders in a foreclosure case. The court granted certiorari for one order, quashing it entirely, and granted it in part for the second order, quashing specific parts. The court found that the discovery requests were overly broad and sough
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2019-12-18
The appellate court reviewed two discovery orders in a foreclosure case. The court granted certiorari for one order, quashing it entirely, finding it compelled production of irrelevant and confidential information. For the second order, the court granted certiorari in part, quash
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2019-12-11
Florida Power and Light Company petitioned for certiorari review of a trial court order denying its motion to dismiss a complaint filed by a former nursing home resident injured during a power outage caused by Hurricane Irma. FPL claimed immunity under a tariff provision protecti
-
-
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary injunction because it failed to comply with procedural rules and lacked federal subject matter jurisdiction.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because it was procedurally insufficient and lacked a showing of irreparable harm. The court deferred ruling on the preliminary injunction.
-
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order due to procedural deficiencies and failure to meet the standard for ex parte relief, deferring ruling on the preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that a temporary restraining order is an extraordinary remedy not warranted by the speculative allegations and procedural failures presented by the plaintiff.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the prerequisites for injunctive relief and denied the motion.
-
The court held that ActivEngage failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable injury, thus denying its motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2019-10-30
The appellate court dismissed a petition for certiorari seeking to unseal a criminal arrest record in a defamation lawsuit. The court found that the petitioners failed to demonstrate irreparable harm that could not be remedied on appeal, a prerequisite for certiorari review.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2019-10-30
The appellate court dismissed a petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of an order denying a motion to dismiss and for summary judgment under Florida's Anti-SLAPP statute. The court found it lacked jurisdiction because the petitioners failed to demonstrate irreparable har
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2019-10-30
Petitioners failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, a jurisdictional prerequisite for certiorari review of a non-final order. The proper mechanism for addressing systematic interlocutory review needs in Anti-SLAPP cases is amendment of Appellate Rule 9.130, not expansion of certi
-
Del. Ch.·
2019-10-25
The Court of Chancery denied BML's motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, and denied Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment. The court found it had subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiffs sought equitable relie
-
The court held that a motion for injunctive relief must seek relief related to claims in the operative complaint and must comply with local rules regarding supporting evidence.
-
Florida voters amended the state constitution in 2018 to automatically restore voting rights to most felons "upon completion of all terms of sentence including parole or probation," but the Florida Legislature enacted a statute implementing this amendment to require payment of fi
-
Plaintiff's application for a temporary restraining order is denied because she failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over claims challenging a state court judgment under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.
-
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining Defendants from manufacturing, selling, or distributing counterfeit goods bearing Plaintiff's trademarks and from transferring assets.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-09-30
The court denied NCH's motion for a preliminary injunction because it sought relief beyond the scope of preliminary injunctions and failed to demonstrate actual and imminent irreparable harm.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's application for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, a favorable balance of harms, and that the injunction serves the public interest.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order was denied due to failure to meet procedural requirements.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2019-09-18
The state petitioned for a writ of certiorari to overturn a circuit court order excluding expert physician testimony regarding whether the defendant-doctor prescribed controlled substances in good faith and in the course of professional practice. The defendant was charged with ra
-
The court denied the motion for preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, as the contracts did not unambiguously assign the defendants' rights of publicity.
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2019-09-09
A petitioner seeking a writ of certiorari must demonstrate irreparable harm, and where an order does not preclude a party from responding to a motion or obtaining future review, irreparable harm is not established.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2019-09-06
The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for reconsideration because it amounted to a disagreement with the court's prior reasoning and rehashed arguments already considered.
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2019-08-30
When a discovery request on its face requires disclosure of attorney-client communications, the trial court must conduct an in-camera inspection to determine whether privilege applies before ordering production.
-
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining the defendants from distributing copyrighted works and using infringing trademarks.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2019-08-14
Nikolas Cruz petitioned for certiorari review challenging a trial court order denying his motion to prevent disclosure of expert visitor names from jail visitation logs. The court denied the petition, finding that while Cruz established irreparable harm, he failed to show that th
-
The court granted the motion only to the extent of preserving camera footage, denying the request for a temporary restraining order.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2019-07-24
The appellate court affirmed a lower court's decision, ruling that a toll authority (MDX) has the proper authority to charge tolls to trailers using its roadways. The court found that the trailer leasing company (Tropical) failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to relief, irre