2,256 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,513 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2020-08-31
This case concerns an appeal by Florida state officials regarding a lower court's decision to vacate an automatic stay on an emergency order related to school reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic. The appellate court reinstated the stay, finding the lower court abused its discr
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff failed to meet the stringent requirements for ex parte relief and failed to address the security bond requirement.
-
The court held that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable injury, as an adequate remedy for compensation exists, thus denying their motion for a temporary restraining order.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-08-20
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order because it lacked required certifications, failed to demonstrate an emergency, and sought to alter the status quo rather than preserve it.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-08-05
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the moving party failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, which is a necessary prerequisite for such relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-08-04
The court granted default judgment for copyright infringement, awarding statutory damages and injunctive relief, but denied attorney's fees without prejudice.
-
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff failed to meet the procedural and substantive requirements for such an extreme remedy without notice.
-
Plaintiff Chloe Tsakiris Alston sued Stands4 LTD and others for stealing and unlawfully transferring her domain name www.calculator.com, alleging violations of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act and other federal laws. The court denied Stands4's motion to dissolve the
-
The court denied plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order in both cases.
-
Del. Ch.·
2020-07-31
The Court granted the Defendants' Motion to Vacate the status quo order (SQO) and denied the Plaintiffs' Motion to Maintain the SQO pending appeal. The Court found that the SQO, initially entered based on the plaintiff Lynch's allegations, should be vacated because post-trial fin
-
The court granted Plaintiff's expedited ex parte application for a temporary restraining order, requiring the immediate transfer of the domain name back to the Plaintiff.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, allowing him to maintain a fist-length beard.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2020-07-09
City Walk – Urban Mission Inc. sought a preliminary injunction challenging Wakulla County's two-adult occupancy limitation on its three-bedroom religious transition home, which the county imposed through amendments to its Land Use Development Code after neighbors objected to resi
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-07-09
The court held that the plaintiffs established a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for their trademark infringement claims, warranting a preliminary injunction.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-07-08
The appellate court dismissed a petition for a writ of certiorari, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate irreparable harm. The petitioner sought to quash protective orders and sanctions issued by the trial court against third parties in a divorce modification case.
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2020-07-08
The appellate court granted Samsung's petition for a writ of certiorari, quashing a trial court order that adopted a magistrate's recommendation to include a sharing provision in a protective order. The court found the trial court departed from essential legal requirements by imp
-
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff's delay in seeking relief created the emergency and they failed to meet the requirements for either form of injunction.
-
The court granted SS&C's motion for a preliminary injunction against Conchiglia, enjoining him from misappropriating trade secrets and soliciting SS&C's clients, but denied the motion as to Summit.
-
The appellate court denied a petition for a writ of prohibition, finding that the petitioners had an adequate remedy at law through a pending appeal. The writ was sought to prevent a lower court from proceeding with a declaratory judgment action concerning the constitutionality o
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2020-06-17
The appellate court quashed a lower court's order compelling one brother, a 50% shareholder in a corporation, to sign loan documents and a personal guaranty against his will. The court held this violated his constitutionally protected freedom of contract.
-
The court held that the plaintiff (FAU) is substantially likely to succeed on its claim that the defendant (Parsont) violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) by intentionally accessing FAU's protected computer system without authorization or exceeding authorized access.
-
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction and granted plaintiffs an opportunity to file a motion to remand.
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2020-05-29
This case concerns whether a claim alleging a hospital failed to transfer a patient for financial reasons, leading to the patient's death, sounds in medical malpractice. The appellate court held that because the claim relates to medical care and professional judgment, it does fal
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2020-05-29
This case concerns whether a claim alleging a hospital failed to transfer a patient due to financial incentives, leading to the patient's death, sounds in medical malpractice. The appellate court held that because the claim directly relates to medical care and the use of professi
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-05-29
The court denied the motion for a stay of its order compelling production of documents.
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2020-05-29
The appellate court reviewed whether a claim alleging a failure to transfer a patient for financial reasons sounded in medical malpractice. The court held that because the claim directly related to medical care and professional judgment, it did sound in medical malpractice, and t
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2020-05-28
In this medical malpractice case, the Fifth District Court of Appeal held that a patient's claim alleging a hospital failed to transfer her to another facility's ICU for financial reasons, resulting in her death, sounds in medical negligence despite being framed as fraud/RICO cla
-
Del. Ch.·
2020-05-20
The court granted Buckeye's request for a preliminary injunction, enjoining GT from preventing Buckeye and its customers from accessing the Tanks via Sico Road pending the outcome of the litigation. The court found that Buckeye had a reasonable probability of success on its claim
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2020-05-20
A complaint alleges medical malpractice when it arises from the failure to render medical care or services and requires proof that the defendant breached the prevailing professional standard of care as testified by a qualified medical expert. The trial court erred in denying the
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-05-15
The court held that AvMed failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, a necessary element for a preliminary injunction, because its claimed injuries were either too remote and speculative or compensable by monetary damages.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-05-15
The court denied the plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order because she failed to satisfy the prerequisites for such relief.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because he failed to comply with procedural requirements and did not establish a substantial threat of irreparable injury.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding compensatory and exemplary damages and issuing a permanent injunction.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's complaint was an impermissible shotgun pleading and failed to comply with procedural requirements for injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-05-01
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report, granting Monster's motion for a preliminary injunction because VPX's purchase of the 'REIGN' trademark was likely an invalid assignment in gross, meaning Monster, as the first user, likely owns the mark.
-
The court granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the defendant for trademark infringement and price gouging, deferring ruling on a preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that the plaintiff (RJFS) failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits in proving that the defendants were not 'customers' or that the broker was not an 'associated person' under FINRA Rule 12200, thus denying the motion for preliminary i
-
The court granted a preliminary injunction against defendants for trademark counterfeiting and infringement, finding a strong likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
The court granted the motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their trademark infringement claims.
-
The appellate court reviewed a discovery order compelling a former husband to disclose financial information for the purpose of determining his former wife's entitlement to attorney's fees. The court held that this disclosure was premature because the underlying motion to set asi
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2020-04-15
The appellate court converted an improper appeal into a petition for writ of certiorari, finding that the trial court erred by dismissing a motion for a Nelson hearing. The court granted the petition, quashing the dismissal order because the defendant's allegations of ineffective
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-04-15
The appellate court dismissed a petition for certiorari, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate irreparable harm. The case involved a trial court's order precluding a deposition in a public records case.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-04-14
The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and her request to proceed in forma pauperis.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-04-03
The court granted default judgment on liability for defamation but denied the request for a permanent injunction, ordering an evidentiary hearing for damages.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-03-31
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because it failed to comply with federal and local rules regarding notice, verification, security, and demonstrating imminent irreparable harm.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, finding insufficient evidence of abusive communications and procedural non-compliance.
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2020-03-24
-
The court held that it lacks jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) to review a claim seeking to enjoin the execution of removal orders, even when related to pending provisional waiver applications.
-
The court denied the motion for injunctive relief and dismissed the case without prejudice.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-03-19
The court granted a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of the breach of contract claim due to the violation of an enforceable non-compete agreement.