5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court granted the plaintiff's unopposed motion to seal documents containing protected health information and granted the plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery. The court also denied the plaintiff's request for an evidentiary hearing without prejudice.
-
The court granted in part the plaintiffs' ex parte application for a temporary restraining order, restraining defendants from infringing on plaintiffs' trademarks, but denied the request for a seizure order.
-
The Court of Chancery found that the Civic Association of Surrey Park (CASP) lacked standing to enforce deed restrictions because the right to enforce was not properly distributed to the association's predecessors after the original developer's dissolution. Furthermore, the court
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-09-24
The court held that a pro se plaintiff's complaint was frivolous and dismissed it with prejudice, enjoining him from filing further actions without prior leave due to his vexatious litigation history.
-
An injunction for protection against domestic violence must be reversed when the respondent has not committed any acts of violence or threats within the three years preceding the filing of the petition, as the petitioner cannot establish an objectively reasonable fear of imminent
-
McGriff Insurance Services sought a preliminary injunction against several former employees and a competitor, Alliant Insurance Services, alleging breaches of non-solicitation and confidentiality provisions in employment agreements, as well as tortious interference and trade secr
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's trademarks, copyrights, and patent.
-
The court granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from manufacturing, selling, or distributing infringing products and from concealing assets.
-
The court granted Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis in the pleadings for copyright infringement, civil conspiracy, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violation of Florida's Sexual Cyberharassment Law, and also gr
-
The court held that the inmate's motion for injunctive relief was denied because he failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or actual and imminent irreparable harm, and the court generally defers to prison administration.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to present admissible evidence linking the defendant to the posting of fake negative reviews, and that the defendant's statements about the plaintiff were not defamatory as a matter of law.
-
The court held that it had authority under Section 19 of the FTC Act to issue a preliminary injunction and asset freeze, even after the Supreme Court limited Section 13(b)'s authority for monetary relief, because the case involved violations of a rule (the TSR).
-
Highland Consulting Group sued a former employee, Jesus Minjares Soule, claiming he violated the Defend Trade Secrets Act and breached a restrictive covenant agreement by using confidential information and soliciting clients after his September 2019 resignation, while Soule count
-
Attorney's fees awarded as damages under section 60.07 for wrongful injunction must be restricted to services rendered in dissolving the injunction and cannot include fees incurred in demonstrating entitlement to attorney's fees.
-
The court held that the defendant Milagros Espinal was in contempt of the court's permanent injunction for preparing tax returns in violation of the injunction, based on clear and convincing evidence.
-
The court granted in part the motion for an anti-suit injunction, enjoining the defendants from pursuing certain claims in Texas state court that fall within the scope of a Delaware forum selection provision. The court held that the forum selection provision in the stock purchase
-
The court recommended extending the TRO as limited, dissolving it regarding the BB&T Trust Account, and setting an evidentiary hearing.
-
The court denied the plaintiffs' ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order because they failed to meet the strict requirements for proceeding without notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b)(1).
-
The court held that Levison and Rothman had actual notice of the Acquinity settlement and likely violated it, while Zangrillo did not have sufficient notice for contempt. The court also found the FTC's request for a preliminary injunction was not an impermissible end-run around t
-
The court held that INPROTSA was in contempt for violating court injunctions and adopted the magistrate judge's recommendations regarding sanctions, awarding attorney's fees but denying disgorgement of revenues.
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2021-08-06
A trial court must conduct a properly noticed evidentiary hearing on a motion to dissolve an injunction for protection against repeat violence when the movant alleges a change in circumstances.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-08-05
A claimant who is not the owner of a vessel cannot obtain an injunction under the Limitation of Liability Act to stay state court proceedings against them.
-
The court held that a party cannot obtain a traditional injunction without asserting an independent cause of action, and that the petitioner failed to meet the requirements for an ex parte temporary restraining order.
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2021-07-29
In this family law appeal, the court affirmed the trial court's order ratifying a joint stipulation in which a father agreed to terminate his parental rights in exchange for elimination of child support obligations, pending stepparent adoption. The court held that while such agre
-
The court held that Castellano failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm, thus denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court denied the defendant's motion for injunctive relief and sanctions, finding it lacked merit and failed to comply with procedural rules.
-
The court held that the party seeking to dissolve an injunction bears the burden to establish changed circumstances, and the allegations and evidence presented were insufficient to support dissolution.
-
The Court of Chancery held that the parties' Employment Agreement clearly and unmistakably delegated the issue of substantive arbitrability to an arbitrator. The court found that the incorporation of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) rules, which empower arbitrators to d
-
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order because the relief sought was outside the scope of the underlying action and sought against non-parties.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation for default judgment against Defendant Fernandez, modifying the proposed injunction language.
-
Florida's ban on written or electronic advertisements encouraging consumers to contact contractors or public adjusters regarding insurance claims for roof damage violates the First Amendment as an impermissible restriction on commercial speech that fails intermediate scrutiny. Th
-
Del. Ch.·
2021-07-08
The Court of Chancery dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that the plaintiff had adequate remedies at law. The court determined that the requested injunctions were either unavailable because they sought to compel compliance with the law or were ade
-
The court awarded statutory damages for copyright infringement and CMI removal, attorneys' fees and costs, and a permanent injunction against the defendants, while denying prejudgment interest.
-
The court granted in part and denied in part the Plaintiff's Motion for Final Default Judgment. The court found that the Plaintiff had stated plausible claims for trademark infringement and false designation of origin under the Lanham Act, and for unfair competition under FDUTPA.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motions for partial summary judgment and a preliminary injunction, establishing the plaintiff's right to condemn easements and granting immediate possession for pipeline construction.
-
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its pipeline project and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession upon FGT's deposit of security.
-
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession.
-
The court granted partial summary judgment and a preliminary injunction, establishing the plaintiff's right to condemn easements for an interstate natural gas pipeline and granting immediate possession.
-
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project under the Natural Gas Act and is entitled to immediate possession via preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its pipeline project under the Natural Gas Act and is entitled to immediate possession via preliminary injunction.
-
The court granted summary judgment, establishing FGT's right to condemn easements, and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession, finding that FGT met the statutory requirements and the standard for injunctive relief.
-
The court held that the plaintiff, Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC, has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project under the Natural Gas Act and is entitled to a preliminary injunction granting immediate possession.
-
The court granted partial summary judgment, establishing the plaintiff's right to condemn easements, and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession to allow construction of a natural gas pipeline.
-
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project and is entitled to immediate possession through a preliminary injunction.
-
The court granted partial summary judgment, establishing the plaintiff's right to condemn easements, and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession, finding the project served the public interest and that irreparable harm would result from delays.
-
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project and is entitled to immediate possession via preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn the necessary easements for its pipeline project and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession.
-
Appellant Gerardo L. Marquez appeals two orders extending ex parte temporary injunctions for protection against dating violence and stalking issued in January 2020. The trial court extended the injunctions on December 29, 2020 without any showing of good cause by either party. Th
-
The court granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from using the plaintiff's trademarks on counterfeit goods and restraining their assets.
-
The Florida Supreme Court adopted amendments to six family law forms governing petitions and injunctions for protection against domestic violence to align with 2020 legislative changes to Chapter 741, Florida Statutes, and clarified one form regarding denial of petitions. The ame