651 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 78 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · browse and sort
-
N.D. Fla.·
2022-05-09
The court held that under Kentucky law, prejudgment interest is not available for unliquidated personal injury claims, including those for noneconomic damages.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-03-29
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, finding no basis to alter or amend the prior summary judgment order.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-03-29
The court denied plaintiff's motions for reconsideration and relief from judgment because she failed to present valid grounds under Rules 59(e) and 60(b).
-
The court denied the motion for reconsideration because the petitioner failed to identify or brief additional grounds for relief within the time allowed.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion to amend the final judgment to include prejudgment interest, finding entitlement from the date of conversion.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-02-25
The court held that plaintiffs waived arguments not raised in initial briefing and that the series-qualifier canon, not the last-antecedent doctrine, applied to the insurance policy's coverage clause, denying reconsideration.
-
852 F. Supp. 994·
M.D. Fla.·
2022-02-24
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a new trial or amended judgment, finding no merit in the arguments that the court failed to adhere to the Eleventh Circuit's mandate or that the jury's verdict was against the weight of the evidence.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-02-23
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration because they failed to demonstrate newly-discovered evidence or manifest errors of law or fact, and the arguments presented were either immaterial, already decided, or untimely.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-01-27
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration because he failed to present new evidence or demonstrate manifest error of law or fact, instead merely rearguing points previously rejected.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-01-06
The court granted in part motions for reconsideration, finding the parties should have proceeded under Local Rule 1.11(c) and that good cause was not sufficiently established for sealing most documents.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-12-13
The court held that filing objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendations may divest the magistrate judge of jurisdiction to consider a motion for reconsideration of that same report. Alternatively, the motion for reconsideration was denied on the merits.
-
The court held that a motion for reconsideration is not a vehicle to raise new arguments or evidence, and the plaintiff failed to show substantial justification or harmlessness for the untimely disclosure of an expert witness.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the judgment, finding no clear error or manifest injustice in the prior grant of summary judgment.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-11-23
The court held that supplemental attorney's fees are not awardable when the fees could have been sought prior to final judgment or were incurred in pursuing an unwarranted motion for reconsideration.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-11-17
The court denied the petitioner's motion for reconsideration, finding no newly discovered evidence or manifest error of law or fact that would warrant relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-26
The Court held that the Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the Magistrate Judge applied the incorrect standard of law when denying the motion for reconsideration.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-12
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for clarification, confirming its intent to grant summary judgment on all retaliation claims, and denied any other relief sought.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-06
The court denied the motion for reconsideration, finding no basis to alter or amend the prior order granting summary judgment.
-
The court granted reconsideration in part, finding Gulfside entitled to judgment on its breach of contract claim for replacement cost value, but denied reconsideration of the dismissal of its declaratory judgment claim for appraisal as premature.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-09-07
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the judgment and denied leave to amend the complaint, finding no clear error in the prior dismissal of the claims.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-08-17
The court denied the petitioner's motion for reconsideration and notice, and denied the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-08-06
The court denied the defendant's post-trial motion to amend the judgment, finding that the arguments presented were either not proper grounds for reconsideration or were disagreements with the court's factual findings. The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-05-07
A motion for reconsideration under Rule 59(e) is denied when the movant attempts to relitigate old arguments or raise new ones without presenting newly discovered evidence or demonstrating manifest errors of law or fact.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-04-19
The court granted in part Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, allowing review of discovery requests on the merits, but denied Plaintiff's second motion to compel as untimely.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-04-19
The court denied the defendant's motion for reconsideration because the defendant failed to present new evidence, intervening law, or clear error, and instead attempted to relitigate issues already decided.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-04-05
The court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that his Armed Career Criminal Act sentence relied solely on the unconstitutionally vague residual clause, and thus, his motion for reconsideration was denied.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-04-05
The court denied the defendant's motions for reconsideration of summary judgment and to preclude testimony, finding no grounds for reconsideration and insufficient basis for exclusion of evidence.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-03-12
The court held that the applicants' motion to amend a prior order was untimely and lacked a legal basis or exceptional circumstances, and therefore denied the motion.
-
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, denying the petitioner's motions.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-03-08
The court held that a motion to amend under Rule 15(a) is untimely after a final judgment has been entered and appealed, and that motions for reconsideration under Rule 59(e) and relief under Rule 60(b) were also untimely or lacked merit.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-01-31
The court held that the pro se petitioner's habeas corpus petition was time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A) because it was filed nearly fourteen years after the judgment became final. Neither statutory tolling nor equitable exceptions applied.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-01-31
The court held that the movant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel were deficient on their face, failing to establish prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-29
The court denied defendants' motions to amend judgment and for a stay pending appeal, and granted the Receiver's motion for possession of the homestead property due to defendants' continued non-compliance with prior orders.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-22
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration was denied because he failed to timely respond to motions and his claims were based on a misinterpretation of the mortgage agreement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-20
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, adhering to its prior order granting summary judgment for the defendant on several claims.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-12-10
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration because it was untimely filed under both Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60(b).
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-12-07
The court denied the petitioner's motion to alter or amend the judgment.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-11-09
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration because he failed to provide an objective method to allocate the jury's lump sum award between past and future pain and suffering, which is required to award prejudgment interest on past damages.
-
The court held that while the plaintiff's breach of contract claim was preempted by Section 301 and thus arose under federal law, it would not be reinstated as a Section 301 claim because the plaintiff failed to plead exhaustion of contractual remedies and the claim was not a hyb
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-09-25
The court held that new evidence created genuine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment on certain civil rights and negligence claims against Deputy Thompkins and Sheriff Bradshaw, while affirming summary judgment for Deputy Jones on all claims.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-09-16
The court denied the plaintiff's motions for reconsideration and disqualification, finding no basis for either. The court granted the plaintiff an extension to file an amended complaint.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-09-02
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration because she failed to present newly discovered evidence, an intervening change in controlling law, or a need to correct clear error or manifest injustice.
-
The court granted the USA's motion to alter judgment, finding a manifest error of fact regarding penalty calculations, and amended the judgment to reflect a lower penalty amount plus accrued interest and late fees.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-07-10
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration failed to meet the standard for granting such relief under Rule 59(e).
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-07-07
The court denied the petitioner's motion to reconsider the denial of his § 2255 motion, finding no newly discovered evidence or manifest error of law or fact.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-06-29
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration, finding no clear error or manifest injustice in its prior order excluding interview transcripts.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-06-15
The court denied the defendant's motion for reconsideration because it failed to present new evidence or law, instead rearguing previously decided issues.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-06-15
The court denied Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of sanctions, finding no clear error or manifest injustice, and proceeded to address the reasonableness of attorneys' fees awarded under Rule 11.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-06-15
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment because it failed to present any valid grounds for reconsideration or relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-06-09
A debt collector cannot rely on a procedure that is incapable of preventing FDCPA violations due to errors of omission to establish the bona fide error defense.