-
320 F. Supp. 2d 1347·
S.D. Fla.·
2004-06-09
·cited 49×
The court held that the defendants' extensive business operations and significant contacts within the United States, particularly Carnival Corporation's substantial ownership and control of Costa Crociere and its subsidiaries, justified the application of the Jones Act and preclu
-
958 F.3d 1050·
11th Cir.·
2020-05-01
·cited 15×
The court held that the district court correctly granted summary judgment for the insurer, finding no coverage under the FST policy because the defendants failed to establish a lease granting exclusive use rights, and properly denied a motion for reconsideration based on untimely
-
38 F.4th 141·
11th Cir.·
2022-06-14
·cited 13×
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, holding that the plaintiff's claim for reformation of a mortgage was barred by Alabama's ten-year statute of limitations for actions to recover land.
-
810 F.2d 113·
6th Cir.·
1987-01-29
·cited 12×
The court held that the district court abused its discretion in awarding attorney fees under the Lanham Act's "exceptional cases" provision because the defendants' continued litigation was justified by unresolved issues and jurisdictional uncertainty.
-
965 F.2d 1184·
1st Cir.·
1992-06-08
·cited 6×
The court affirmed the dismissal of the motion to vacate, holding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate entitlement to relief or an evidentiary hearing on his claims.
-
975 F.2d 964·
3d Cir.·
1992-09-16
·cited 4×
The court held that a notice of appeal must specifically designate the judgment or order being appealed, and absent such designation, appellate jurisdiction over prior, unspecified orders is barred, especially when the appellant explicitly stated they were not appealing the prior
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-13
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, finding no newly discovered evidence or manifest errors of law or fact.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-10
The court held that its prior order remanding the case to state court is not reviewable, and therefore denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-08-16
Former students Kareem Britt and Sharon Henry sought to challenge a federal court's order compelling them to arbitration rather than pursue their lawsuit against Florida Career College, but the court rejected both their motion for reconsideration and their motion to certify the o
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-08-15
The court denied the defendant's motion for reconsideration or to brief issues, finding no manifest error of law or fact and that the issues raised had already been addressed.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-03-10
The court denied the motion for reconsideration because the petitioner failed to identify or brief additional grounds for relief within the time allowed.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-11-24
The court held that a motion for reconsideration is not a vehicle to raise new arguments or evidence, and the plaintiff failed to show substantial justification or harmlessness for the untimely disclosure of an expert witness.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-09-22
The court granted reconsideration in part, finding Gulfside entitled to judgment on its breach of contract claim for replacement cost value, but denied reconsideration of the dismissal of its declaratory judgment claim for appraisal as premature.
-
16 Pa. D. 265·
S.D. Fla.·
2017-03-20
The court held that a motion to dismiss for failure to appear at a deposition should not be granted when the parties agreed to reschedule and there was no flagrant disregard of discovery duties.
-
138 B.R. 88·
M.D. Fla.·
1992-04-02
The court held that the attorney's charging lien should be calculated on a quantum meruit basis, and prejudgment interest should accrue from the date of the attorney's discharge, not the initial trial judgment.
-
857 F.2d 1366·
9th Cir.·
1988-09-26
A final judgment retains its res judicata consequences pending appeal, and a pending Rule 59(e) motion does not deprive a judgment of finality for res judicata purposes.