Aiding And Abetting

3,842 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count

• United States v. Frazier
  491 F.2d 243· 6th Cir.· 1974-01-23
  The court held that the search warrant's description of the property was sufficiently definite to identify the premises to be searched.
• Reynolds v. Tennessee
  414 U.S. 1163· U.S.· 1974-01-21
• United States v. Bennie Cal Stone
  487 F.2d 511· 6th Cir.· 1973-11-20
  The court held that the trial judge did not err in giving an instruction on aiding and abetting, and the evidence was sufficient to convict.
• United States v. Audsley
  486 F.2d 289· 5th Cir.· 1973-10-25
  The court held that evidence of prior transactions was admissible to prove knowledge and intent, and that other grounds for appeal lacked merit.
• United States v. Cyrus F. Johnson, Jr.
  485 F.2d 205· 4th Cir.· 1973-10-02
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to prove the vehicle was stolen and that the defendant aided and abetted its transportation in interstate commerce.
• United States v. Grady F. Blanden
  472 F.2d 154· 3d Cir.· 1973-01-11
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction for aiding and abetting the passage of counterfeit bills.
• United States v. Cervantes-Gonzalez
  472 F.2d 611· 9th Cir.· 1973-01-02
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions and that the jury instructions were adequate.
• United States v. Dorantes
  471 F.2d 298· 3d Cir.· 1972-11-08
  The court held that in-court identification testimony is admissible even without a pre-trial lineup, and that the codefendant's testimony and the co-defendant's disappearance did not warrant reversal.
• Prieto-Morejon v. United States
  468 F.2d 250· 5th Cir.· 1972-10-12
  The court affirmed the district court's denial of the motion to vacate judgment and sentence.
• United States v. Kerr
  464 F.2d 1367· 6th Cir.· 1972-08-07
  The court held that the prosecutor's cross-examination, while potentially prejudicial, was relevant and not so pronounced or persistent as to warrant a mistrial, especially given the strong evidence of guilt and the jury's focus on testimony.
• United States v. Baity
  464 F.2d 570· 5th Cir.· 1972-07-28
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to warrant conviction and any error in admitting testimony was harmless.
• United States v. Ramirez
  463 F.2d 1199· 9th Cir.· 1972-07-17
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction for aiding and abetting the sale of narcotics without the required Treasury order forms.
• United States v. Floyd
  462 F.2d 579· 9th Cir.· 1972-07-03
  The court held that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict of guilt for transporting a stolen motor vehicle in interstate commerce.
• United States v. Dufur
  461 F.2d 662· 10th Cir.· 1972-06-20
  A defendant can be convicted of aiding and abetting even if the principal is not charged, and the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction.
• United States v. Alvarez
  462 F.2d 176· 9th Cir.· 1972-06-05
  The court held that the evidence was insufficient to prove that Alvarez made any transfer of marihuana or aided and abetted anyone who did so.
• United States v. Moore
  460 F.2d 1265· 6th Cir.· 1972-06-01
  A defendant can be convicted as a principal for aiding and abetting, even if not indicted as such.
• United States v. Austin
  459 F.2d 315· 3d Cir.· 1972-04-20
  The court held that admitting prior inconsistent statements of a defense witness for impeachment purposes, after the defense called that witness, was not error, even if the statements incriminated the defendant. The court also held that the evidence was sufficient to support the
• United States v. Prater
  462 F.2d 292· D.C. Cir.· 1972-03-30
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict that the appellant aided and abetted the offenses and that the pistol used was a dangerous weapon.
• United States v. Salas
  456 F.2d 1288· 9th Cir.· 1972-03-14
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions and that the appellants' other arguments were without merit.
• United States v. Owen
  455 F.2d 500· 9th Cir.· 1972-02-03
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the trial court did not commit plain error by allowing a dismissed co-conspirator to remain in the courtroom.
• United States v. Brown
  451 F.2d 158· 6th Cir.· 1971-11-24
  The court held that there was ample proof to convict the defendant of aiding and abetting an assault on a mailman and possessing stolen mail.
• Kemp v. State
  254 So. 2d 228· Fla. 1st DCA· 1971-11-16
• United States v. Domenic Gullia
  450 F.2d 777· 3d Cir.· 1971-11-05
  The court held that it was error to give additional instructions to a single juror in the absence of the remaining jurors and the defendants.
• United States v. Isia Porcha
  450 F.2d 697· D.C. Cir.· 1971-09-15
  The court held that any error in the indictment's presentation of robbery charges was harmless, and the appellant's statement was not erroneously admitted.
• Darwin Highsmith v. State
  252 So. 2d 294· Fla. 2d DCA· 1971-09-08
  The court held that the appellant's contention of racial discrimination and lack of justice was groundless, and the record was free of error.
• Rowe v. State
  250 So. 2d 920· Fla. 2d DCA· 1971-06-30
• United States v. Baker
  442 F.2d 1024· 2d Cir.· 1971-05-19
  The court held that the admission of fingerprint evidence, even if read from records by a non-maker, was permissible under the business records exception and that a mistrial was not warranted due to a prejudicial news article.
• United States v. Smith
  442 F.2d 448· 9th Cir.· 1971-05-06
  The court held that the jury instructions were adequate and that evidence obtained through consensual eavesdropping was admissible.
• United States v. Cordell Cassell
  440 F.2d 569· 7th Cir.· 1971-04-09
  The court held that a post-indictment confession made in the absence of counsel is admissible if the defendant was properly informed of his rights and voluntarily waived them. The court also held that the trial judge's questioning and admission of evidence regarding other offense
• Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Jacobs
  438 F.2d 329· 3d Cir.· 1971-02-19
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict of first-degree murder, and the conviction was properly affirmed.
• United States v. Loyd Allen Reid
  437 F.2d 94· 10th Cir.· 1971-01-04
  The court held that the jury instruction regarding accomplice testimony was proper and sufficient to sustain a conviction.
• Payton v. United States
  436 F.2d 575· 10th Cir.· 1970-12-22
  A voluntary guilty plea waives claims of factual insufficiency of the indictment, and such claims cannot be raised in a collateral attack under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255.
• United States v. Stout
  432 F.2d 1005· 9th Cir.· 1970-11-05
  The court held that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction for aiding and abetting embezzlement and that the trial judge acted properly.
• United States v. Judd
  432 F.2d 770· 9th Cir.· 1970-10-27
  The court held that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction on Count Three, given the prior acquittal on Counts One and Two due to lack of possession.
• Arnett Wiggins v. State
  238 So. 2d 500· Fla. 1st DCA· 1970-08-20
  Arnett Wiggins was convicted of robbery after being present during the crime and constructively participating in it. He appealed challenging the trial court's jury instruction on principal liability, arguing it was broader than the statute and prejudicially erroneous.
• United States v. Villa
  427 F.2d 542· 9th Cir.· 1970-06-03
• United States v. Steinbrecher
  427 F.2d 530· 7th Cir.· 1970-05-25
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and that the government did not improperly withhold discoverable evidence.
• United States v. Carter
  417 F.2d 229· 3d Cir.· 1969-10-21
  The court held that the trial court did not err in allowing cross-examination of a government witness after a plea of surprise, as no impeachment evidence was actually used, and the witness's testimony was sufficient to support the conviction.
• United States v. Lanny Gold Arbucci
  416 F.2d 1332· 5th Cir.· 1969-10-10
  The court held that the jury charge, considered as a whole, contained no prejudicial error. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
• United States v. Bryant Oscar Pearce
  412 F.2d 895· 4th Cir.· 1969-07-15
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction and that the defendant received effective assistance of counsel.
• Ray Caruso and Donald v. Ostergard
  414 F.2d 225· 5th Cir.· 1969-06-09
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to establish that the defendant falsely pretended to be a government officer and obtained money in that pretended character.
• Mims v. State
  222 So. 2d 221· Fla. 2d DCA· 1969-04-18
  The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a conviction for grand larceny, despite a dissenting opinion arguing that a jury instruction erroneously conflated larceny with accessory after the fact, thereby frustrating the truth-finding process and violating due process.
• United States v. Bell
  407 F.2d 862· 4th Cir.· 1969-03-03
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's convictions for forging and uttering United States Treasury checks.
• United States v. Headrick
  407 F.2d 384· 6th Cir.· 1969-02-17
  The court held that the evidence presented was sufficient for a jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of aiding and abetting in the passing of falsely made postal money orders.
• United States v. Wood
  406 F.2d 615· 4th Cir.· 1969-02-10
  The court held that the defendant's conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and that his claims of error regarding the exclusion of evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel were without merit.
• Ewing v. United States
  404 F.2d 625· 10th Cir.· 1969-01-03
  The court held that the appellants' arrest was lawful, they were not denied a speedy trial, the testimony of a coconspirator was admissible, and the addition of a conspiracy count to a superseding indictment was proper.
• Jones v. United States
  400 F.2d 892· 8th Cir.· 1968-10-02
  The court held that the appellant's arguments regarding the insufficiency of Count II and prejudice from the trial judge lacked merit, affirming the denial of his motion to correct sentence.
• Johnson v. United States
  394 F.2d 984· 5th Cir.· 1968-05-16
  The court held that the evidence was insufficient to support a disorderly conduct conviction for appellant Perkins, but sufficient for the other two appellants.
• Coronado v. United States
  390 F.2d 16· 9th Cir.· 1968-02-21
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the convictions and that the trial court did not err in its rulings or instructions.
• United States v. Hendrex
  387 F.2d 931· 6th Cir.· 1968-01-19
  The court held that the defendant's constitutional rights were not violated and the indictment was sufficient to charge the offense.