DARWIN HIGHSMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the appellant's contention of racial discrimination and lack of justice was groundless, and the record was free of error.
The appellant, a sixteen-year-old, was indicted for two counts of first-degree murder based on armed robberies where victims were killed. He was furni…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Felony Murder cases and more on FLexlaw
Highsmith filed in the trial court an “Appeal for Justice” which the trial judge properly considered as a notice of appeal. In it he asserts that he did not and could not get justice in the court at Tampa because he is black. We have examined the record with care and find this contention groundless.
Highsmith was indicted on two counts of murder in the first degree. He was sixteen, and the charge was based on two instances in which a group of which he was a part committed armed robbery in the course of which the victims were killed. Even an unintentional killing in the course of robbery is murder in the first degree. Fla.Stat. § 782.04(3) (1969), F.S.A. And one who aids and abets the robber who kills is guilty in the same degree. Fla.Stat. § 776.011 (1969), F.S.A. So the fact that another man fired the fatal shots is immaterial.
Highsmith, perhaps because of his age, was allowed to plead guilty to murder in the third degree. His plea was accepted only after patient judges had determined its voluntariness. Highsmith was furnished counsel at public expense. They pursued the case with vigor, discovering the extent of the state’s evidence against Highsmith. The record shows a knowing and intelligent plea to these charges. The state’s willingness to accept conviction of a lesser offense was to Highsmith’s benefit, *295so that he need not face either the electric chair or life imprisonment. This record is free of error, and the convictions are
Affirmed.
PIERCE, C. J., and LILES, J., concur.