-
380 F.2d 769·
6th Cir.·
1967-07-14
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions for possessing, forging, and uttering a stolen government check.
-
380 F.2d 10·
4th Cir.·
1967-06-21
The court held that the accomplice's testimony regarding the defendant's prior knowledge and intent to rob the bank was admissible, even if conclusory.
-
29 Fla. Supp. 35·
Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.·
1967-06-14
The defendant was convicted in metropolitan court of aiding and abetting reckless driving based solely on his presence as a passenger. The appellate court reversed, holding that mere presence without active participation does not constitute aiding and abetting, and that the trial
-
371 F.2d 516·
9th Cir.·
1966-12-27
The court held that causing mailings in connection with fraudulent transactions is sufficient for conviction, even if the defendant did not personally use the mails.
-
370 F.2d 566·
4th Cir.·
1966-12-09
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to modify or stay a sentence pending a codefendant's retrial.
-
190 So. 2d 824·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1966-10-07
The court held that the evidence was insufficient to support the charge of murder in the second degree, as the defendant's constructive presence was not established.
-
367 F.2d 574·
4th Cir.·
1966-10-07
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction for bank robbery, supporting the trial court's inferences.
-
366 F.2d 764·
4th Cir.·
1966-09-14
The court held that the jury charge was appropriate and the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions.
-
362 F.2d 965·
D.C. Cir.·
1966-05-26
The court held that the trial court erred in allowing a jury instruction that converted a statement previously represented as exculpatory into an admission, potentially affecting the fairness of the trial regarding the Mallory issue.
-
362 F.2d 964·
D.C. Cir.·
1966-05-16
-
352 F.2d 786·
4th Cir.·
1965-11-02
The court held that a petitioner's increased sentence after a successful appeal was not an impermissible penalty for exercising the right to appeal, nor was the absence of counsel during a discretionary sentence reduction reversible error.
-
350 F.2d 587·
7th Cir.·
1965-07-15
The court held that the defendants unlawfully and willfully misapplied funds of a savings and loan association and converted them to their own use, and unlawfully participated in receiving benefits from transactions with the association with intent to defraud.
-
344 F.2d 120·
2d Cir.·
1965-04-14
The court held that the admission of evidence of payments made after the agreement date did not constitute a prejudicial variance requiring reversal, and that post-agreement statements and overheard conversations were admissible.
-
342 F.2d 141·
2d Cir.·
1965-02-26
The court held that possessing plates to print counterfeit foreign currency without the recognized government's authority violates 18 U.S.C.A. § 481, and the citation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2 was not prejudicial.
-
345 F.2d 728·
D.C. Cir.·
1964-10-06
-
334 F.2d 787·
7th Cir.·
1964-07-27
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict and that the admission of certain evidence was not erroneous.
-
330 F.2d 1022·
5th Cir.·
1964-04-28
The court held that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict and that failure to object to a jury charge waives appellate review.
-
325 F.2d 145·
2d Cir.·
1963-12-10
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's guilty verdict on all counts of the indictment.
-
324 F.2d 249·
7th Cir.·
1963-10-10
The court held that a mere claim of guilt transference from a defective conspiracy count to a substantive count is insufficient to reverse a conviction.
-
311 F.2d 699·
5th Cir.·
1963-01-09
The court held that counts two and three of the indictment sufficiently charged crimes under the Narcotic Control Act without alleging intent to defraud, as intent to defraud is not an essential element for those specific offenses.
-
307 F.2d 235·
10th Cir.·
1962-08-02
The court held that the evidence supported the jury's verdict and the trial proceedings were free from error, thus affirming the conviction.
-
297 F.2d 408·
2d Cir.·
1962-01-04
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction for aiding and abetting a bank officer in misapplying funds and for conspiracy.
-
295 F.2d 63·
9th Cir.·
1961-09-13
The court held that the trial judge's participation in examining witnesses, even if extensive, did not warrant reversal absent other errors or a close case on guilt.
-
290 F.2d 159·
5th Cir.·
1961-05-18
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's findings that the defendant aided and abetted the possession and sale of untaxed distilled spirits and was a member of a conspiracy to deal in such spirits.
-
290 F.2d 585·
2d Cir.·
1961-05-11
The court held that the appellant's remark, indicating control over the sale price and payment method, was sufficient evidence to submit the case to the jury.
-
282 F.2d 748·
7th Cir.·
1960-10-13
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the jury's verdict of guilty on both counts of unlawful interstate transportation for prostitution.
-
264 F.2d 688·
5th Cir.·
1959-03-12
The court held that the appellant's claims of judicial bias, prosecutorial misconduct, improper jury instructions, and inconsistent verdicts were without merit.
-
250 F.2d 909·
1st Cir.·
1957-12-26
The court held that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant submission to the jury and support the convictions for conspiracy and substantive liquor offenses.
-
11 Fla. Supp. 152·
Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.·
1957-11-15
The court held that no error was committed which injuriously affected the substantial rights of the appellant, and therefore the judgment should be affirmed.
-
246 F.2d 228·
2d Cir.·
1957-06-25
The court held that the plain language of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, specifically 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 462(b)(2), does not limit the intent for possessing a draft card to evading military service, but encompasses any purpose of false identification or rep
-
229 F.2d 881·
10th Cir.·
1956-01-30
The court held that the defendant's conviction and sentence for conspiracy to commit a substantive offense, alongside the conviction for the substantive offense itself, did not constitute impermissible cumulative sentencing as the offenses were distinct.
-
224 F.2d 898·
3d Cir.·
1955-08-10
The court held that the trial court's jury instructions regarding the defendant's intent were confusing and prejudicial, necessitating a new trial on the mail fraud charge.
-
70 So. 2d 358·
Fla.·
1954-02-09
Henderson and other defendants appealed their murder convictions, challenging the admission of photographs as evidence and the sufficiency of evidence. The Florida Supreme Court upheld the convictions, finding the photographs relevant and the evidence sufficient under the felony
-
199 F.2d 860·
5th Cir.·
1952-11-22
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to connect the appellant with the making and use of a false document, supporting his conviction.
-
177 F.2d 781·
10th Cir.·
1949-11-01
The court held that restoring stricken allegations to an indictment before jeopardy attaches does not violate the Fifth Amendment, and denying a continuance was not an abuse of discretion.
-
175 F.2d 956·
3d Cir.·
1949-06-14
The court held that the jury's verdict may have been substantially swayed by an erroneous instruction regarding a legal duty to report, requiring a new trial.
-
151 F.2d 417·
5th Cir.·
1945-10-18
The court held that the defendant's actions, including attempting to flee and his statement regarding the whiskey, justified the conclusion that he was aware of the contraband and aiding in its transportation, making him a principal.
-
126 F.2d 214·
5th Cir.·
1942-02-24
The court held that the evidence supported the indictment and conviction, and that no reversible error occurred.
-
125 F.2d 138·
7th Cir.·
1942-01-16
The court held that there was substantial evidence to support the conviction and no abuse of discretion in denying the motion for severance or in admitting evidence.
-
122 F.2d 127·
5th Cir.·
1941-08-02
The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction for aiding and abetting the uttering of a forged check.
-
95 Fla. 765·
Fla.·
1928-04-20
This case involves the appeal of a murder conviction for J. A. Conner and Mrs. J. A. Conner. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's judgment, finding no error in the conviction of both defendants for first-degree murder.
-
S.D. Fla.·
1924-07-21
District court overruled demurrers filed by a bank and its cashier-vice president in a case alleging they aided and abetted a felonious larceny, holding that a corporation is responsible for tortious acts of its agents committed within the scope of employment.