521 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,043 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
875 F.2d 1310·
7th Cir.·
1989-05-24
·cited 18×
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate harm from the union's inadequate notices regarding agency fees, and thus were not entitled to restitution or punitive damages. Class certification was also denied due to a conflict of interest.
-
876 F.2d 787·
10th Cir.·
1989-05-16
·cited 18×
The court held that the determination of whether an individual acted as a government agent for Section 1983 purposes, when credibility is not at issue, is a question of law for the court, not the jury.
-
The court held that the confusing jury verdict and inconsistent findings necessitated a new trial for all parties.
-
A district court may dismiss a pro se in forma pauperis complaint as frivolous only if it lacks any "arguable substance in law or fact," and cannot dismiss based on credibility determinations of the allegations.
-
828 F.2d 1096·
5th Cir.·
1987-10-05
·cited 18×
The court held that a public employee's truthful testimony in a civil lawsuit, even if neutral, constitutes protected speech under the First Amendment, and retaliation for such testimony warrants back pay and reinstatement.
-
The court held that the evidence supported the jury's finding of a municipal custom of deliberate indifference to police misconduct, and that this custom proximately caused the plaintiff's assault, establishing municipal liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
-
810 F.2d 514·
5th Cir.·
1987-02-23
·cited 18×
The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the claims against the individual officers in their individual capacities, but correctly dismissed the claim against the city due to insufficient allegations of policy or custom.
-
The court held that the alleged slapping, even if true, did not rise to the level of severe injury required for a § 1983 excessive force claim.
-
745 F.2d 149·
2d Cir.·
1984-09-18
·cited 18×
A government attorney performing duties analogous to a prosecutor, such as initiating proceedings to secure a witness's appearance, is entitled to absolute immunity from liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Local governmental bodies cannot be held liable under § 1983 based on respon
-
Summary judgment was inappropriate because substantial issues of material fact exist regarding the context and intent of the plaintiff's statement, which are crucial for determining First Amendment protection.
-
A nolo contendere plea in a state criminal case does not automatically bar a subsequent federal civil rights action under § 1983 for alleged constitutional violations, and the right to privacy can encompass avoiding disclosure of personal matters.
-
The court held that the district court correctly dismissed the section 1983 suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to the availability of adequate state remedies and properly awarded attorney's fees for a frivolous action.
-
The court held that the district court abused its discretion in denying attorney's fees to the prevailing defendant because the civil rights action brought was frivolous and without foundation.
-
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to review the dismissal of an alleged class action where the individual claim of the class representative had become moot and the class had not been properly certified by the district court.
-
The court held that the State of Illinois is immune from suit in federal court under the Eleventh Amendment, and that while defendant Weil's actions may have deprived plaintiff of a constitutional right, claims against municipalities under § 1983 require a policy or custom, not j
-
536 F.2d 277·
9th Cir.·
1976-02-09
·cited 18×
The court held that a prisoner's allegations of mail interference and termination of privileges for legal activities, if proven, state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and that negligent deprivation of rights can be actionable under § 1983. Claims based on respondeat superior were
-
The court held that the decision in Gates v. Collier should not be applied retroactively to require expungement of pre-Gates prison disciplinary records, and that the class action was properly brought under § 1983.
-
A prosecuting attorney is not absolutely immune from civil liability for acts outside his quasi-judicial capacity, such as deliberate suppression of exculpatory evidence.
-
The court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint, holding that while the appellant's insanity might toll the New Jersey statute of limitations for Section 1983 claims, the United States is not a 'person' under Section 1983, and other claims were barred by statutes of limitations
-
The court held that the allegations in the removal petition were insufficient to meet the conditions for removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1443, as the eminent domain proceedings did not present a situation where federal rights would inevitably be denied.
-
884 So. 2d 50·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2004-02-27
·cited 17×
A corrections officer sought immunity from a wrongful death lawsuit arising from an inmate's suicide in jail custody. The court held that disputed factual evidence about whether the officer disregarded the inmate's known suicide risk precluded summary judgment on both sovereign i
-
The court held that the district court failed to conduct the required de novo review of the magistrate's findings because it did not review the evidentiary hearing transcript or tape recording.
-
827 F.2d 195·
7th Cir.·
1987-08-20
·cited 17×
The court held that the admission of evidence that the suspect was unarmed after the shooting was prejudicial and irrelevant, and that the jury instructions regarding prior misconduct were improper.
-
790 F.2d 1063·
3d Cir.·
1986-05-22
·cited 17×
The court held that a municipality's adherence to a state judge's illegal bail schedule, even if blatantly illegal, does not constitute a municipal policy for Monell liability purposes.
-
Federal law does not preclude state and local police from enforcing criminal provisions of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, and Arizona law authorizes such arrests if supported by probable cause and constitutional procedures. However, detention at a police station constitu
-
612 F.2d 275·
6th Cir.·
1980-01-04
·cited 17×
A § 1983 action will not lie against police supervisory officers for failure to prevent misconduct absent a showing of direct responsibility.
-
The court held that municipalities can be sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for constitutional violations implementing official policy, and vacated a back pay award for reconsideration in light of Monell.
-
502 F. Supp. 2d 1224·
S.D. Fla.·
2007-07-18
·cited 16×
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a claim against the county under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and that the defendant officers were entitled to qualified immunity due to insufficient factual allegations.
-
839 So. 2d 709·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2003-01-02
·cited 16×
The Third District Court of Appeal reversed a damages judgment against the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles and Trooper Jacqueline Gipson for false arrest and civil rights violations arising from an allegedly improper DUI arrest. The court held that the Dep
-
The court held that the complaint sufficiently pleaded a violation of a clearly established constitutional right to survive a motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity.
-
A plaintiff must sufficiently allege that disciplinary action was taken because of constitutionally protected speech and, for municipal liability, must plead a custom or policy, not just a single incident.
-
957 F.2d 953·
1st Cir.·
1992-03-05
·cited 16×
The court held that the municipality and police chief were not liable under § 1983 for the detainee's suicide, as their actions did not rise to the level of deliberate indifference, and a minor child cannot assert a claim for loss of familial association when the state action was
-
The court held that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment for the Personnel Board and the County, and that its findings regarding the Sheriff's promotion decisions were not clearly erroneous.
-
934 F.2d 929·
8th Cir.·
1991-05-29
·cited 16×
A local governmental entity cannot be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for a custom of failing to investigate or train unless there is a widespread pattern of misconduct and the entity had notice, which was not shown here.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to preserve most issues for appeal due to lack of contemporaneous objections at trial, and that the admitted evidence and jury instructions did not constitute plain error.
-
A county can be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for the actions of its sheriff if the sheriff is the final policymaker for law enforcement and abuses that authority, even without proof of an official county policy or custom.
-
The court held that a prisoner's claims of excessive force and denial of medical treatment lacked an arguable legal basis, even though the magistrate improperly made credibility determinations.
-
Dismissal of a complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) is inappropriate after service of process has been made on the defendants. Alternatively, the complaint had arguable merit, precluding such dismissal.
-
891 F.2d 1241·
6th Cir.·
1989-12-20
·cited 16×
A municipality can be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deliberate indifference to a prisoner's serious medical needs, even if medical care is subcontracted, if the failure to supervise or the ratification of unconstitutional acts amounts to an official policy or custom.
-
The court affirmed the denial of the motion for a new trial and the dismissal of defendant Adams, but remanded for clarification regarding the award of attorneys' fees.
-
879 F.2d 1037·
2d Cir.·
1989-06-30
·cited 16×
The court held that a new trial should be granted on the First Amendment claim, and that the denial of judgment n.o.v. on the Eighth Amendment claim should be reversed.
-
The court held that a foreclosing mortgagee acting under Louisiana's foreclosure procedures, which allow for the extinguishment of subordinate interests without actual notice to the holder of that interest, can be considered a state actor for Due Process Clause purposes, and that
-
Judges and prosecutors are absolutely immune from liability for damages for acts intimately connected with the judicial and parole-granting processes, and the plaintiff failed to state a claim for injunctive relief.
-
The dissenting judge holds that RRI demonstrated a property interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment because the Architectural Review Board failed to act on its permit application within the time prescribed by village code, thereby entitling RRI to the permit.
-
864 F.2d 947·
1st Cir.·
1989-01-04
·cited 16×
The court held that the Secretary of Education was not liable for the janitor's termination because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a causal link between the Secretary's actions and the alleged harm. The court affirmed the jury's verdict for the clerical employees.
-
A jury could find that the use of a nightstick on a handcuffed, non-resisting arrestee constituted an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment, even without proof of serious injury.
-
863 F.2d 1398·
8th Cir.·
1988-12-21
·cited 16×
The acts of a municipal judge in discharging a court clerk are attributable to the City for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 liability, as the judge possesses final policymaking authority in employment matters concerning court clerks under state law.
-
858 F.2d 1075·
5th Cir.·
1988-10-31
·cited 16×
The City of Dallas cannot be held liable under the Sherman Act or section 1983 for issuing notices of zoning violations because these notices lacked legal finality and did not constitute a final determination causing concrete injury.
-
859 F.2d 797·
9th Cir.·
1988-10-19
·cited 16×
The court held that the County's ratification of its subordinates' actions in acquiring improper deeds and incorporating roads without valid rights-of-way constituted reckless disregard for plaintiffs' constitutional rights, making the County liable under § 1983. The court also h
-
The court held that negligence in losing legal mail does not state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and alleged physical abuse by prison guards did not rise to the level of a constitutional claim.